No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise vs Grok comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ChatGPT Team - Enterprise
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (2nd), AI Code Assistants (5th), AI Proofreading Tools (2nd)
Grok
Ranking in Large Language Models (LLMs)
9th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AI-Powered Chatbots (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Large Language Models (LLMs) category, the mindshare of ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is 8.7%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grok is 4.6%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Large Language Models (LLMs) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise8.7%
Grok4.6%
Other86.7%
Large Language Models (LLMs)
 

Featured Reviews

Neha Chhangani - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Collaborative workspace has transformed our content creation and daily team productivity
There is scope for improvement in ChatGPT Team - Enterprise regarding more customization of team behavior. Teams often want even finer control over how the assistant responds, including industry-specific tones, branding voice, or response constraints that apply only to certain teams within the organization. While the shared workspace is powerful, deeper integration with internal enterprise systems could enhance accuracy and relevance. Current team history features are useful, but some teams want more granular control over what is shared or archived, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. More flexible memory settings at the project or chat level and better usage analytics would be beneficial. Admins often want richer insights into how the team is using the platform, not just overall usage but impact metrics tied to business outcomes. Real-time collaboration is great, but there is room to grow in how teams co-author and annotate AI outputs together. Additional improvements would include domain-specific models. Some teams operate in highly specialized domains and want models tuned to their field. The option to load domain-specific language packs or fine-tuned models within the enterprise environment would be valuable. Teams sometimes want clearer insight into why the assistant responded a certain way, especially on complex queries, so adding an explain-why feature with brief reasoning steps or confidence indicators for responses would improve understanding. For ultra-sensitive deployments, some organizations prefer tools that can run without cloud dependency, so having a secure on-premise or private cloud deployment option with the same collaboration compatibilities would be beneficial. Further improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise include the AI better understanding inter-team context. This would involve recognizing when a query relates to a previous project or department-specific knowledge to reduce repeated explanations or clarifications. While it handles many languages, more robust enterprise-grade multilingual capabilities, including idiomatic expressions and regional business terminologies, would help global teams collaborate more effectively. Allowing the AI to tailor responses based on the user's role makes output more precise and immediately actionable. For highly sensitive projects, having a secure offline mode or on-premises deployment would increase adoption in regulated industries.
Malte Landwehr - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President, Seo at idealo Internet GmbH
Staying updated with pop culture is easier, but voice feature needs refinement
On Twitter, or X itself, the option that on any post, I can just access Grok functionality with one click is valuable. In general, I appreciate the ability to discuss very current trends and developments. Because I cannot follow all Internet subculture all day every day, Grok makes it easy to get accurate information on these up-to-date pop cultural phenomena.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise has helped us work smarter, not harder, and deliver better outcomes more quickly, with specific positive impacts including faster content and deliverables, better team alignment, smoother onboarding, higher quality outputs, and time saved on repetitive work."
"It is pretty valuable that we can set up prompts to define the context for conversations with ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, which enables it to stay the course during responses."
"ChatGPT has positively impacted our organization by speeding up a lot of our processing time."
"The best features of ChatGPT include having a lot of information integrated, and it is quick to learn how to prompt the questions and to integrate text in documents to get a faster review or create a report."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise makes my life very easy because every time I have to look up something on Google, I have to search through multiple results, but ChatGPT Team - Enterprise provides information in a simpler view with the easiest format and in quite literally the simplest sentences."
"From a cost-effective standpoint, the most immediate return on investment comes from saving time across high-value tasks, resulting in approximately a 40 to 60 percent reduction in manual effort and turnaround time, when translated into costs."
"I would rate ChatGPT a nine on a scale of one to ten."
"ChatGPT Team - Enterprise has positively impacted my organization by simplifying work, allowing tasks that could have required five or six people to be completed with fewer individuals while helping us create well-constructed content with great grammar and easily accessible stored information."
"I previously tried to do the same with ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, but none of them have the ability for this up-to-date, real-time, niche, pop culture knowledge that Grok possesses."
"I previously tried to do the same with ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity, but none of them have the ability for this up-to-date, real-time, niche, pop culture knowledge that Grok possesses."
 

Cons

"Filtering the database based on indexes is difficult in Rockset and should be simplified."
"The pricing is on the heavier side for the Nigerian market."
"Rockset is now bought by OpenAI. It’s uncertain if Rockset will continue to exist as it is."
"One area where ChatGPT Team - Enterprise can be improved is hallucinations."
"Citation accuracy and source attribution is also an area that could be enhanced in literature review and academic writing."
"They have room for improvements in search as sometimes it gives out wrong information."
"More real-time DevOps integration features should be added, and better long-session memory handling should also be improved."
"I would not recommend ChatGPT as a standalone product. I think it could be beneficial when used alongside other tools, but as a standalone solution, its accuracy cannot be entirely trusted."
"Grok is already pretty good, but I don't like the voice mode. It doesn't work very well, giving very long answers and explanations and repeating certain greetings."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Large Language Models (LLMs) solutions are best for your needs.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
14%
University
11%
Construction Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ChatGPT?
In terms of improvements needed for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise, accuracy still requires enhancement in complex or high-domain specific scenarios, particularly architecture and security topics. Respo...
What is your primary use case for ChatGPT?
My primary use case for ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is supporting day-to-day work across engineering, products, QA, and customer support teams, mainly using it for code assistance, technical document...
What advice do you have for others considering ChatGPT?
ChatGPT Team - Enterprise is deployed in my organization through a secure public cloud-based SaaS model, accessed via authenticated enterprise accounts, integrating into my existing workflows and t...
What needs improvement with Grok?
Grok is already pretty good, but I don't like the voice mode. It doesn't work very well, giving very long answers and explanations and repeating certain greetings. It is not enjoyable.
What is your primary use case for Grok?
My main use cases are twofold. One is when I read something on Twitter, Grok can explain it to me, even if it's just an image or if it requires a lot of background information. Grok can always give...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Rockset
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Cisco 3. Comcast 4. DoorDash 5. Expedia 6. Facebook 7. GitHub 8. IBM 9. Lyft 10. Microsoft 11. Netflix 12. Oracle 13. Pinterest 14. Reddit 15. Salesforce 16. Slack 17. Spotify 18. Square 19. Target 20. Twitter 21. Uber 22. Verizon 23. Visa 24. Walmart 25. Yelp 26. Zoom 27. Airbnb 28. Dropbox 29. eBay 30. Google 31. LinkedIn 32. Amazon
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Blackbox and others in Large Language Models (LLMs). Updated: March 2026.
885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.