Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Centreon vs EV Observe comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Centreon
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
20th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (16th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th)
EV Observe
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
60th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AIOps (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Centreon is 2.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of EV Observe is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Centreon2.4%
EV Observe0.4%
Other97.2%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK - PeerSpot reviewer
Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support
I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.
Use EV Observe?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise14
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?
Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.
What needs improvement with Centreon?
I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...
What is your primary use case for Centreon?
We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.
1. BMW 2. BYD 3. Daimler 4. Ford 5. General Motors 6. Honda 7. Hyundai 8. Kia 9. Mercedes-Benz 10. Nissan 11. PSA Peugeot 12. Citroën 13. Renault 14. Toyota 15. Volkswagen 16. Volvo 17. Aptiv 18. Bosch 19. Continental 20. Delphi 21. ZF Friedrichshafen 22. ABB 23. Eaton 24. Infineon Technologies 25. Lear 26. Panasonic 27. Qualcomm 28. Valeo
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: October 2025.
872,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.