Catchpoint vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Catchpoint and Quest Software are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 24 Catchpoint reviews

5,639 Views
3,045 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Read 22 Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Catchpoint and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (13th), Network Monitoring Software (12th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (4th)

Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

reviewer2867268

Observability Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Proactive synthetic monitoring has reduced major incidents and provides global user experience insights

One thing that is not available is the multi-factor authentication feature concerning monitoring any applications. If an application depends upon MFA for its login flow, Catchpoint doesn't have the ability to bypass or monitor that flow for multi-factor authentication. This is one area where I would like to see improvement in the tool because many applications nowadays use multi-factor authentication, and Catchpoint does lag a bit in providing the end-to-end synthetic observability for applications dependent on MFA. This is one of the major areas needing improvement. Otherwise, Catchpoint has been one of the greatest tools in the synthetic monitoring or digital experience monitoring space, and I don't see anything else right now, but MFA is something that certainly needs some improvement.

Read full review

Anton Kasimov

Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Drill-down monitoring shows us the entire transaction chain, from the front end to back end. It needs HTML5 interface.

I want to see a new interface that contains HTML5 features. The current version of Foglight (on-premise edition) is so fusty in comparison with leaders of Gartner APM Quadrant - i.e. Appdynamics, NewRelic, Dynatrace. If you try to compare SaaS and on-premise Foglight versions you can see differences in UI-design. It's my subjective experiences, but SaaS version looks more modern. Hope this helps

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good, as it allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."

"They only lose two points for the cost; otherwise, the insights they provide are really good."

"The capacity to identify those issues regionally, nationally, and globally was an unbelievable return on our investment."

"Catchpoint has had a positive impact on my company because we have a good overview of the worldwide availability of our sites, at least in the countries where we need to make them available."

"Catchpoint has positively impacted my organization because we have supported multiple customers and handled many escalations before they became critical issues."

"Catchpoint has impacted my organization positively by speeding up the process in detecting issues much earlier, even before the business reaches out."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

More Catchpoint pros

"It was easy and saved costs."

"The most valuable feature is drill-down monitoring, which shows us from one interface the transaction chain from the front end to back end."

"The ability to track performance of an application or application suite over time is extremely valuable to our business partners and for our application development team with near real time results."

"Foglight is the best overall solution we use, but it doesn't do everything we need or doesn't provide the best solution to everything we want to monitor."

"Foglight Enterprise was the most scalable and easy to deploy tool."

"We are able to capture the real time user experience of our solutions and we have an understanding of overall performance."

"With the APM you can replay the end user session and see issues quickly by viewing the session."

"Excellent monitoring capability and business service views"

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] pros

Cons

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

"For some larger workflows, I think the product could improve in a few areas."

"We would like the script creation feature of this solution to be improved, as it currently requires a complicated manual process to update the scripts."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"I would love to have RAM monitoring available in Catchpoint, which would be a nice feature for both synthetic and real user monitoring, and it would be an amazing tool that I would love to have, complementing each other."

"Currently, Catchpoint is migrating to a new user interface. My colleagues and I feel that the old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"A large selection of nodes are available but it is a challenge to test reliably in China and the Middle East."

More Catchpoint cons

"They need to improve the stability of FxM and FxV."

"Stability was always an issue in large environments."

"In an older version of Foglight, we were not able to get any of our custom agents to work properly so that feature was not as much use as we had initially hoped and haven't tried using since."

"Complicated setup and maintenance."

"We had issues with deployment in the beginning until we had an expert guide us through the process."

"It needs a more intuitive way to create and implement custom "Cartridges" to be deployed through out a Federated environment."

"The “cartridge” concept for every little thing is a bit of a bother to implement."

"We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"The price is expensive for us."

"Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."

"I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."

"Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

20%

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been great. There is always a need to negotiate a bit more to get the best cost for the licenses we plan to buy. We expect better costs fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Catchpoint?

My main use cases for Catchpoint are synthetic monitoring and transactions monitoring for different applications. We have a lot of critical tier zero applications where there is a need to have synt...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Pingdom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Dynatrace vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

September 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Foglight, Dell Foglight

Overview

Catchpoint is a robust monitoring solution offering synthetic and real user monitoring, network performance analysis, and root cause identification. It enhances response times, reduces downtime, and improves user experience through advanced features and support.

Catchpoint provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities that ensure application availability and improve user experience. By delivering synthetic and real user monitoring, API tracking, and cloud network performance insights, it enables companies to diagnose issues, maintain service reliability, and anticipate problems. Organizations can effectively simulate user actions, monitor endpoints, and obtain actionable insights for diverse applications and websites, supporting seamless digital transactions.

What are the key features of Catchpoint?

Synthetic and Real User Monitoring: Offers comprehensive insights into performance and user interactions.
Root Cause Analysis: Identifies issues quickly to minimize downtime and improve service reliability.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides tailored views for performance metrics and test results.
Alert Notifications: Keeps teams informed of potential issues with timely alerts.
Network Performance Monitoring: Tracks cloud and local network performance for optimal operation.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Savings: Optimizes performance to reduce operational costs and enhance ROI.
Improved SLA Management: Helps maintain service level agreements with reduced false alerts.
Enhanced User Experience: Delivers consistent and responsive applications to users.
Operational Efficiency: Automates processes for minimizing manual intervention.

Catchpoint is implemented across industries for proactive performance monitoring, ensuring digital platform reliability and superior user experience. Its tools enable companies to track application availability and network performance, utilizing global coverage to deliver crucial insights for decision-making processes.

Catchpoint

Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.