Catchpoint vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Catchpoint and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Catchpoint is ranked #57 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #60 with an average rating of 8.0. Catchpoint holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Catchpoint

Read 18 Catchpoint reviews

2,373 Views
1,044 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

806 Views
637 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Catchpoint

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Catchpoint and OpenText Network Operations Management compete in the network performance monitoring category. Catchpoint has the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and strong customer support, while OpenText offers more comprehensive features despite a higher cost.

Features: Catchpoint offers real-time monitoring, synthetic testing, and detailed network visibility. OpenText Network Operations Management provides extensive network automation, advanced analytics capabilities, and in-depth network control.

Room for Improvement: Catchpoint can enhance its analytics depth, improve automation capabilities, and expand its customization options. OpenText Network Operations Management might focus on simplifying its integration processes, reducing initial setup complexity, and offering more flexible pricing plans.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catchpoint is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and efficient customer service, beneficial for quick setup needs. OpenText Network Operations Management, while complex in deployment, offers extensive customization, appealing to organizations needing versatile monitoring solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Catchpoint presents an attractive setup cost focusing on high ROI quickly, ideal for budget-conscious buyers. OpenText Network Operations Management, with a higher initial cost, offers long-term value through its advanced capabilities, promising substantial returns over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (40th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (11th)

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Catchpoint	0.5%
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.3%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Henry Mike

Senior Network Engineer at AT&T

Monitoring has delivered proactive issue detection and improves user experience across our apps

The best features Catchpoint offers are Catchpoint Synthetics, Catchpoint API test, Catchpoint Dashboard, and Catchpoint UI. I would like to add that Catchpoint UI is very user-friendly and with a basic introduction, anyone can just get started. When we talk about Catchpoint Dashboard, this is our one-stop shop for all our monitors. It has multiple widgets that display various application performance metrics. We use this feature immensely and it is of great value to our business. When it comes to Catchpoint Synthetics, it enables us to create our synthetic monitoring using Catchpoint. Creating the Synthetics monitors is easy and requires basic knowledge of Selenium and JavaScript. It also allows us to run the test from external, which is the backbone, and internal enterprise nodes. Additionally, Catchpoint provides detailed insights of each request that is involved in the application flow, which helps us in addressing the issue at the request level. With the help of Catchpoint, we are able to address issues before our customers. Our triage time has reduced. We are able to reduce outages and unwanted user incidents. We are able to get to the root cause of the issue efficiently post-implementing Catchpoint monitoring.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Catchpoint has everything you could want in a synthetic tool, and many things that you didn't know you wanted but you are ecstatic to have."

"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."

"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."

"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."

"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."

"Catchpoint has a very professional service team, they can help you with the scripting and other functionalities, and they have a dedicated network team, so if you face any issues with the geolocations on the nodes or anything related to the network, there is dedicated support available 24 hours a day, seven days a week."

"Catchpoint has impacted my organization positively by providing a positive return on investment on proactive monitoring capabilities, adaptability, and being seen as a long-term solution regardless of changes made to the monitored environment."

"During business hours, it has worked absolutely fine without any issues."

More Catchpoint pros

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

Cons

"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."

"Currently, Catchpoint is migrating to a new user interface. My colleagues and I feel that the old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature."

"The old user version was better, it was more user-friendly."

"Catchpoint is a very reliable tool, but for the less tech-savvy, this tool might not be very user-friendly to them, so it has a bit of a learning curve."

"A room for improvement in Catchpoint is that it lacks an automated page updating feature. My company receives all the alerts and notifications it needs, but the page doesn't update automatically. You need to manually refresh the page, so every five minutes you need to refresh it to see the most updated information. If there's an automated page refresh feature, that would help my company. It's a feature that Grafana has. The page auto-refreshes in Grafana, so you don't have to manually refresh the page. If that feature is implemented in Catchpoint, it'll be useful for the users. Another area for improvement in the tool is you have to do a manual task, for example, when you have a notification for a market, you get a zip code that the user could have entered, but if the zip code is incorrect, you have to manually go into Catchpoint and update that parameter, so that manual step is another area in the tool that needs improvement."

"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."

More Catchpoint cons

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"It may need a more customizable UI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."

"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."

"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."

"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?

Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost was very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Catchpoint?

Catchpoint can be improved as it has a complex setup and configuration, and dashboard customization and UX should be improved.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint

Compared 10% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Catchpoint

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Catchpoint

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Catchpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Catchpoint Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 30% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 25% of the time

ThousandEyes vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 20% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 14% of the time

Flowmon vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint

March 2026

Download Catchpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

March 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText

Buyer's Guide

Catchpoint vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

March 2026

Free Report: Catchpoint vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Catchpoint vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.