Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Catchpoint vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Catchpoint and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Catchpoint is ranked #40 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #64. Catchpoint holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Catchpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Catchpoint
Read 14 Catchpoint reviews
  • 989 Views
  • 508 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Diagnostics
Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews
  • 442 Views
  • 258 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Diagnostics and Catchpoint are two prominent tools in network and application performance monitoring. OpenText Diagnostics offers superior pricing and support, making it a cost-effective solution, but Catchpoint's feature richness justifies its higher price.

What features are offered by OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Catchpoint?

OpenText Diagnostics offers comprehensive diagnostic capabilities, ease of integration with existing systems, and a cost-effective pricing model. Catchpoint stands out with advanced synthetic monitoring, real-time analytics, and a sophisticated toolkit of features, making it a more robust solution for performance monitoring.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Catchpoint?

OpenText Diagnostics could enhance its reporting, improve customization options, and expand its feature set. Catchpoint's areas for improvement include better documentation, more user-friendly setup processes, and enhanced customer support responsiveness.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Catchpoint?

OpenText Diagnostics is favored for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer service. Catchpoint is noted for quick deployment but has mixed reviews regarding customer support responsiveness.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Catchpoint?

OpenText Diagnostics offers competitive pricing with an appealing ROI due to efficient problem-solving capabilities. Catchpoint has higher setup costs justified by superior features, and users recognize a higher ROI due to its advanced monitoring capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Catchpoint vs. OpenText Diagnostics Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Catchpoint vs. OpenText Diagnostics
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Catchpoint
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
40th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (58th), Cloud Monitoring Software (31st), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (10th)
OpenText Diagnostics
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
64th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Catchpoint is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

AnmolRai - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable monitoring features enhance ecommerce experience while improvement needed in region-specific insights
As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive similar data for the China market as we do for North America and Asia Pacific, this would be helpful.
Read full review
RS
Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training
HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The drill-down feature of this product was very good. It allowed us to identify the exact page or area of the site that was causing our customers an issue."
"The most valuable features of Catchpoint are basically the transaction monitors on the API and UI."
"The solution offers three different ways of slicing data to look for abnormalities."
"One of the features, the scatter plot, is very useful. It shows red dots wherever there are issues."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to identify and troubleshoot network issues."
"Catchpoint's customer service and support are valuable."
"Catchpoint helped us establish that something is in a provider network, so we could tell our customers to check their internet provider because the traffic is not getting to us. You need to be gentle when you tell them that, but the fact that we could do it was crucial."
"We really need the API monitoring, as well as client side session monitoring, the global synthetic monitoring, to track the availability of the systems from the customer side."
More Catchpoint pros
"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."
"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."
 

Cons

"if we need to do performance analysis, we have to click too many times. For example, if there is an issue that is caught by Catchpoint, we need to understand what the error is and at which step it failed, or which transaction that is impacted. To drill down, we have to click too many things to get the answer."
"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."
"Catchpoint can be improved by focusing solely on network monitoring."
"As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues."
"Trending needs improvement. Currently, out-of-the-box, they provide only seven days availability. So, we have to do queries and we have to go into a separate analysis module, we have to run lot of queries to long-term trends."
"There are essentially a lot of quotas. Nobody wants to sit and manually create monitors for someone who uses synthetic monitoring."
"It would be great if Catchpoint could incorporate its alerting system instead of relying on separate tools like ServiceNow."
"The product could include global monitoring and predictive analytics to identify widespread issues and cyber threats."
More Catchpoint cons
"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."
"The interface could be more user friendly."
"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models."
"The pricing is based on consumption and works on a point scale. For example, let's say I want to look at www.google.com, and I'm going to test it to see if it's there. It will bring back all this data that tells me how long it took to connect and how long it took to get the first byte. It will list all the resources on the page, showing that they all work and there are no broken links. It brings that data back. That test has an assigned point value depending on what you decide to extract from that test. If all I do is check to see whether it's available, it might be one point. I don't know the exact point values off-hand. This is just an example."
"In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher."
"The solution's pricing is comparable to the last tool we were using."
"The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Retailer
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Catchpoint?
Catchpoint is very flexible and also provides logs for troubleshooting purposes. It helps us fix issues within the SLAs signed with the end users. The tool is easy to learn.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Catchpoint?
The solution's pricing varies based on services and licensing models. Clients typically see significant operational and cost efficiencies, with time savings estimated between 30% and 40%.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Catchpoint?
As part of the improvement, there are certain categories, like for the China market, where we face issues. We are currently using an external tool, Splunk, for reporting. If we could receive simila...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Catchpoint Logo
Dynatrace vs Catchpoint
Compared 23% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint Logo
ThousandEyes vs Catchpoint
Compared 15% of the time
Datadog vs Catchpoint Logo
Datadog vs Catchpoint
Compared 13% of the time
New Relic vs Catchpoint Logo
New Relic vs Catchpoint
Compared 11% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Catchpoint
Compared 6% of the time
More Catchpoint Competitors
Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics
Compared 43% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Diagnostics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Diagnostics
Compared 32% of the time
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Diagnostics
Compared 25% of the time
More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Catchpoint
June 2025
Catchpoint reportDownload Catchpoint product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
June 2025
OpenText Diagnostics reportDownload OpenText Diagnostics product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
 

Overview

Catchpoint is the Internet Resilience Company™. The top online retailers, Global2000, CDNs, cloud service providers, and xSPs in the world rely on Catchpoint to increase their resilience by catching any issues in the Internet Stack before they impact their business. Catchpoint’s Internet Performance Monitoring (IPM) suite offers synthetics, RUM, performance optimization, high fidelity data and flexible visualizations with advanced analytics. It leverages thousands of global vantage points (including inside wireless networks, BGP, backbone, last mile, endpoint, enterprise, ISPs, and more) to provide unparalleled observability into anything that impacts your customers, workforce, networks, website performance, applications, and APIs.

Learn more at: https://www.catchpoint.com/

Catchpoint
Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Buyer's Guide
Catchpoint vs. OpenText Diagnostics
June 2025
Free Report: Catchpoint vs. OpenText Diagnostics
Find out what your peers are saying about Catchpoint vs. OpenText Diagnostics and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Catchpoint vs. OpenText Diagnostics report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.