Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs Checkmarx One comparison

The compared CAST and Checkmarx solutions aren't in the same category. CAST is ranked #3 in SDA , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 8.1% mindshare in the category. Checkmarx is ranked #3 in AS , with an average rating of 8.2, and holds a 10.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of CAST users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Checkmarx users who would recommend it.
CAST Application Intelligen...
Read 4 CAST Application Intelligence Platform reviews
  • 1,014 Views
  • 659 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Checkmarx One
Read 79 Checkmarx One reviews
  • 17,511 Views
  • 13,659 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CAST Application Intelligence Platform and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Snyk, CAST and others in Software Development Analytics.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. Snyk Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. Snyk
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CAST Application Intelligen...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Software Development Analytics (3rd)
Checkmarx One
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (3rd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (16th), Container Security (15th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (3rd), AI Security (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. CAST Application Intelligence Platform is designed for Software Development Analytics and holds a mindshare of 8.1%, down 8.9% compared to last year.
Checkmarx One, on the other hand, focuses on Application Security Tools, holds 10.2% mindshare, down 12.1% since last year.
Software Development Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CAST Application Intelligence Platform8.1%
SonarQube42.8%
Snyk32.8%
Other16.30000000000001%
Software Development Analytics
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Checkmarx One10.2%
SonarQube19.2%
Veracode6.1%
Other64.5%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

VG
Vishal-Goyal
Chief Architect at Peristent Systems
Has a security dashboard that's helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry
The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code.
Read full review
Shahzad Shahzad - PeerSpot reviewer
Shahzad Shahzad
Senior Solution Architect | L3+ Systems & Cloud Engineer | SRE Specialist at Canada Cloud Solution
Enable secure development workflows while identifying opportunities for faster scans and improved AI guidance
Checkmarx One is a very strong platform, but there are several areas where it can improve to support modern DevSecOps workflows even better. For example, better real-time developer guidance is needed. The IDE plugin should offer richer AI-powered auto-fixes similar to SNYK Code or GitHub Copilot Security, as current guidance is good but not deeply contextual for large-scale enterprise codebases. This matters because it reduces developer friction and accelerates shift-left adoption. More transparency control over the correlation engines is another need. The correlation engine is powerful but not fully transparent. Users want to understand why vulnerabilities were correlated or de-prioritized, which helps AppSec teams trust the prioritization logic. Faster SAST scan and more language coverage is needed since SAST scan can still be slow for very large mono-repos and there is limited deep support for new language frameworks like Rust and Go, along with advanced coverage for serverless-specific frameworks. This matters because large organizations want sub-minute scans in CI/CD as cloud-native ecosystems evolve fast. A strong API security module is another area for enhancement. API security scanning could be improved with active testing, API discovery, full Swagger, OpenAPI, drift detection, and schema-based fuzzing. This is important as API attacks are one of the biggest AppSec risks in 2025. Checkmarx One is strong, but I see a few areas for improvement including faster SAST scanning for large mono-repos, deeper language framework support, more transparent correlation logic, and stronger API security that includes discovery and runtime context. The IDE plugin could offer more AI-assisted fixes, and the SBOM lifecycle tracking can evolve further. Enhancing integration with SIEM and SOAR would also make enterprise adoption smoother, and these improvements would help developers and AppSec teams move faster with more accuracy.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Used for controlling the technical debt and code quality."
"The most valuable feature of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is its security dashboard which is a dedicated dashboard that's pretty helpful because it gives compliance checks based on some of the leading frameworks in the industry, such as ISO 5055, OWASP, CWE Top 25, and NIST security guidelines. I find the security dashboard of the solution and the information it provides pretty useful. The security dashboard of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is a feature that stands out."
"It supports most programming languages."
"Our clients use CAST Highlight for cloud migration. This allows them to remove or remediate the blockers which are highlighted. This part of the solution shows improvement in quality and captures feedback for our clients."
"CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platform."
"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."
"The solution improved the efficiency of our code security reviews. It helps tremendously because it finds hundreds of potential problems sometimes."
"Checkmarx One has positively impacted our organization as we tend to find vulnerabilities very early in the development cycle."
"Checkmarx One has definitely helped us to save time and reduce the need for additional security resources, meaning employees."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."
More Checkmarx One pros
 

Cons

"The overall coverage of rules could be improved in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform because it does not cater to or cover all. For example, 2022 CWE coverage is still not available in the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. The solution also covers some NIST rules, but it does not cater to all rules. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next update of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is for it to provide source code developer and contributor details, especially information on which areas of code were touched. This would be a good insight as the CAST Application Intelligence Platform looks into the source code."
"Implementation could be made more simpler as it is complex."
"Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering issues."
"The integration of this solution could be improved."
"It has very few plugins to access different code repositories, so source code has to be fed."
"Its pricing model can be improved. Sometimes, it is a little complex to understand its pricing model."
"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."
"Checkmarx One is often down when the cloud provider experiences issues. A more fail-tolerant solution needs to be created."
"It takes around 30 to 40 minutes for checking a build. If you can make it within five minutes or 10 minutes, that would be great."
"Checkmarx One can be improved by reducing noise and improving false positive filtering."
"The product can be improved by continuing to expand the application languages and frameworks that can be scanned for vulnerabilities. This includes expanded coverage for mobile applications as well as open-source development tools."
"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."
"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."
More Checkmarx One cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do know how the CAST Application Intelligence Platform is licensed, but I'm not able to give the cost because the price is not listed. My company works with individual vendors, so pricing is on a case-to-case basis, but the vendors give specialized pricing because of the enterprise deployment, though my team is aware of product pricing based on lines of code, based on the number of applications, etc., I'm unable to give the exact licensing costs of the CAST Application Intelligence Platform. My company doesn't have to pay extra for some features or services because all are included as part of the enterprise license. On a scale of one to five, with five being very cheap and one being very expensive, I would rate the CAST Application Intelligence Platform as three out of five."
"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."
"The solution is costly."
"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."
"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."
"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."
"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."
"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."
"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."
More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Development Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
8%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise45
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
CAST's risk and security flow detection capabilities are highly effective, particularly in identifying security vulnerabilities. It is one of the most important and valuable features of the platfor...
See all answers
What needs improvement with CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
Areas for improvement in CAST AIP include enhancing support for implementation in complex environments and improving technical support to address organizational challenges alongside engineering iss...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for CAST Application Intelligence Platform?
CAST AIP is a valuable solution for quality metrics and application security. It is beneficial for software architecture detection.
See all answers
What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?
I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.
See all answers
What do you like most about Checkmarx?
Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?
Checkmarx One is a premium solution, so budget accordingly. Make sure you understand how licensing scales with additional applications and users. I advise negotiating multi-year contracts or bundle...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
SonarQube vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 53% of the time
Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Fortify Application Defender vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 10% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 9% of the time
Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
Veracode vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 7% of the time
BlueOptima vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform Logo
BlueOptima vs CAST Application Intelligence Platform
Compared 6% of the time
More CAST Application Intelligence Platform Competitors
SonarQube vs Checkmarx One Logo
SonarQube vs Checkmarx One
Compared 49% of the time
Veracode vs Checkmarx One Logo
Veracode vs Checkmarx One
Compared 6% of the time
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One Logo
Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One
Compared 5% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 4% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs Checkmarx One
Compared 3% of the time
More Checkmarx One Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube
December 2025
CAST Application Intelligence Platform reportDownload CAST Application Intelligence Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Checkmarx One
December 2025
Checkmarx One reportDownload Checkmarx One product report
 

Also Known As

CAST AIP
No data available
 

Overview

CAST Application Intelligence Platform (AIP), a result of over $130M in R&D investment over two decades, is an enterprise-grade software measurement and quality analysis solution designed to analyze multi-tiered, multi-technology applications for technical vulnerabilities and adherence to architectural and coding standards and then provide business relevant information to the IT organization through various dashboards and products built with end users in mind.

  • Application Analytics Dashboard (CAST AAD): Provides IT executives with accurate business relevant analytics to drive their organization
  • Application Engineering Dashboard (CAST AED): Provides engineering and QA teams with powerful code and system level structural flaw insight and remediation guidance
  • Enlighten: Delivers to developers a powerful deep understanding of their application’s structure
  • Architecture Checker: Gives architects a reliable, automated solution to enforce architectures that deliver stability and performance of their critical applications

CAST’s underlying system-level analysis technology assesses both the health of an application, as measured through numerous health factors, as well as specific structural and system-level defects that drive performance and stability issues providing true system level analysis.

CAST

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

  • Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
  • API security
  • Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
  • Container security
  • IaC security
  • Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
  • Codebashing secure code training
  • AI security
  • Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
  • Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx
 

Sample Customers

Steria, T-Systems MMS, Atos Origin, Accenture, Capgemini
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Buyer's Guide
CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube
December 2025
Free Report: CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube
Find out what your peers are saying about CAST Application Intelligence Platform vs. SonarQube and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Software Development Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.