We performed a comparison between Camunda and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."
"Business monitoring (BAM) needs improvement because the analytics and prediction module very often has performance problems."
"It is quite expensive."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and IBM BPM. See our Camunda vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
