CA Unified Communications Monitor vs LiveAction LiveNX comparison

Broadcom and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #101, while BlueCat is ranked #29 with an average rating of 7.8. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

379 Views
250 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 10 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,755 Views
1,281 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

LiveAction LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and LiveAction LiveNX compete in the network monitoring and management category. LiveAction LiveNX appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features despite CA Unified Communications Monitor's favorable pricing and support.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities for voice and video traffic, making it valuable for communication tracking. It includes efficient alert systems, customizable dashboards, and seamless integration with existing communication platforms. LiveAction LiveNX offers deep visibility into network performance with advanced analytics, visualization tools, and automated network configuration. It enables real-time monitoring, extensive protocol support, and integration capabilities across various platforms.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could benefit from a more intuitive user interface, quicker deployment setup, and enhanced analytics tools for greater insights. It also needs improved interoperability with third-party applications. LiveAction LiveNX would improve with a simplified licensing model, expanded scalability for larger networks, and more affordable maintenance options. Enhanced reporting features could also add value to its current offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAction LiveNX is recognized for its straightforward deployment and efficient customer service. Its simplified processes make setup easy and fast. CA Unified Communications Monitor, while requiring more time for setup with complex configurations, provides better post-deployment support, offering extensive assistance once deployed.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor presents a lower initial cost, attracting budget-conscious organizations. It offers reliable ROI with its affordable pricing and effective support. LiveAction LiveNX involves a higher initial investment, delivering enhanced ROI through superior features and performance. Its advanced capabilities justify the premium pricing by optimizing network efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

101st

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

68th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th)

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

31st

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"LiveAction LiveNX provides valuable real-time and historical network traffic visualization capabilities that help monitor and analyze network performance."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

More LiveAction LiveNX pros

Cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

More LiveAction LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"It's very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 44% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 29% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 27% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 18% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 15% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 10% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

August 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

August 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

LiveNX

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

August 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. LiveAction LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.