CA Unified Communications Monitor vs HPE OneView comparison

Broadcom and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Broadcom is ranked #61, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in IM, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

2,146 Views
1,288 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

HPE OneView

Read 84 HPE OneView reviews

5,066 Views
4,661 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

HPE OneView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and HPE OneView compete in the IT management category. HPE OneView has an advantage in delivering a more integrated and scalable IT management experience due to its robust hardware management features.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor provides detailed insights into communication performance, user activity tracking, and proactive issue resolution. HPE OneView focuses on automation, infrastructure monitoring, and a streamlined management dashboard.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance integration with other IT management tools, expand reporting capabilities for deeper analytics, and improve scalability for larger enterprises. HPE OneView may benefit from a more intuitive user interface, more extensive support for third-party hardware, and an enhanced alert system for better incident management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers a pragmatic deployment model tailored for communication systems, supported by specialized customer service. HPE OneView provides a holistic deployment approach aligned with hardware infrastructure, with customer service focusing on comprehensive IT management support.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is known for a moderate setup cost, promising ROI through enhanced communication efficiency. HPE OneView may have a higher upfront cost but delivers significant ROI by improving the management of physical and virtual IT infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. HPE OneView Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. HPE OneView

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd), Network Monitoring Software (88th)

HPE OneView

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE OneView is 1.1%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE OneView	1.1%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.6%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

Kapil Pandey

Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG

Gaining seamless monitoring and customization capabilities

One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click. The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios. The features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers. There is more feasibility when using HP Service Manager because, unlike other tools with predefined standards for script writing, we have the option for customization as per our choice, and dashboard reports can be customized.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"I would definitely advise them to work with HPE."

"In the latest version, I like the way that everything's been consolidated and brought together, one single pane of glass for management."

"It improves our productivity, because we can use OneView for more than just servers."

"We could literally swap out a piece of hardware, slide one back into the chassis, and immediately - about three reboots later - it was identical. We didn't have to worry about configuring it, we didn't have to spend any time getting anything into place. It came back and it healed the environment almost immediately."

"The remote support automatically logs service calls and support cases with HPE, which is really good."

"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "

"The solution is scalable and I used simulation mode for many enclosures and 400-500 nodes with no inefficiencies."

"First, that it’s simple; it saves me time and is easy to use, releases stress for me, and since I’m working with federal law, I really need to make sure that all of my customers and their data are protected properly."

More HPE OneView pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"To be honest, we've been having some issues with the stability of the product."

"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."

"There is room for improvement, especially with the speed of things."

"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."

"We've had some profile issues and some weird bugs."

"Use it, but do not think it is going into the clouds, because it is not. There is room for improvement."

"I'd like to know where the product is going, whether it's converging with another, whether they're going to shut it down, etc."

"I know we tend to have issues with our server profiles. When we're changing server profiles and applying them we run into some red flags occasionally."

More HPE OneView cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"HPE could lower the price."

"This license cost for OneView was $3,000 USD."

"I would rate the cost as six out of ten."

"When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost. Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

"Synergy does not require iLO licenses but servers and enclosures must be purchased."

"I think that the price of OneView is $500 USD per server, which is a little high."

"The solution is free to use, but if you want the management aspect you require a virtual machine such as C7000 or Synergy which require licenses."

"Use it. It is free."

More HPE OneView pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	51

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with HPE OneView?

From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE OneView?

The typical use case for HPE OneView addresses a shift from manual monitoring, where clients needed to log in to the server every hour. After integrating everything on HP Service Manager and HP Ope...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE OneView?

Regarding the integration capabilities of HPE OneView with platforms such as VMware, SAP, or other platforms, I work for Telecom VAS servers, for SMSC, CMC, and CRB. We already have an HP team in p...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

NetApp Data Infrastructure Insights vs HPE OneView

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco UCS Manager vs HPE OneView

Compared 6% of the time

Dell CloudIQ vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs HPE OneView

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE OneView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

June 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE OneView

June 2026

Download HPE OneView product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

HP OneView

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

HPE OneView offers a centralized platform for managing IT infrastructure with ease, emphasizing automation and reducing errors. Its integrated approach provides users unified control over storage, compute, and network management.

HPE OneView delivers comprehensive infrastructure visibility and effective monitoring through a user-friendly interface. Automation, real-time alerts, and quick server deployment enhance operational efficiency. Seamless integration and profile templates further streamline workflows. Despite its strengths, some users seek improved navigation, faster response times, and extended platform support. Enhanced reporting and support for older hardware models are desirable.

What key features make HPE OneView valuable?

Single Pane of Glass: Centralized management across IT infrastructure.
Automation: Streamlines processes and reduces deployment times.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications for proactive management.
User-Friendly Interface: Enhances ease of use and reduces training time.
Profile Templates: Simplifies configuration for consistent deployments.
Unified Console: Supports storage, compute, and network management seamlessly.

What ROI should users consider when evaluating HPE OneView?

Efficiency Gains: Automation reduces manual effort and errors.
Improved Monitoring: Centralized alerts ensure quick issue resolution.
Deployment Speed: Faster setup times for IT resources.
Integration Benefits: Seamless connections with virtualization platforms enhance workflows.
Cost Reduction: Streamlined operations lower operational expenses.

Companies leverage HPE OneView across sectors such as finance, telecom, and government, utilizing its capabilities for unified monitoring, management, and configuration. It's implemented on-premises and as a hybrid cloud management interface, supporting environments like Synergy and VMware. By integrating with virtualization platforms, it advances hardware, firmware, and network management efficiency, significantly reducing manual processes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. HPE OneView

June 2026

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. HPE OneView

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. HPE OneView and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. HPE OneView report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.