CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Idira Privileged Access Manager comparison

Broadcom and Idira by Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

CA Privileged Access Manage...

Read 9 CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

22,329 Views
9,378 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CA Privileged Access Manage...

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] compete in the field of privileged access management. While Idira is recognized for its flexible pricing and responsive support, CA PAM Server Control [EOL] distinguishes itself with a more extensive feature set, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager provides comprehensive identity management, effective session monitoring, and detailed audit trails. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] supports granular access control, seamless platform integration, and advanced security policies to address complex security needs.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its security features, provide better integration with third-party applications, and expand its audit capabilities. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] can improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and lower its cost to increase accessibility for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] offers detailed documentation and robust support for smooth deployment. In contrast, Idira Privileged Access Manager features agile deployment and quick customer support, making it suitable for faster ROI with immediate implementation benefits.

Pricing and ROI: Idira Privileged Access Manager presents a lower initial setup cost and flexible pricing options, resulting in a fast ROI. Although CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] has a higher setup cost, it provides substantial long-term value thanks to its superior features, positioning it as a noteworthy investment for organizations seeking comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 905,526 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Privileged Access Manage...

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

230

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (2nd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)

Featured Reviews

it_user558603

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.

I would like to see some improvements, specifically in terms of some set-up items. We have spoken to CA quite a bit about the ability to have 'always-on', or 'active/active' status options, so if the infrastructure goes down, we don't lose transactions. This is very important for the environment and for the users so we cannot really afford any downtime with the solution. We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment.

Read full review

Atul-Gujar

CyberArk manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Secures critical infrastructures with essential user session audit records

A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk. For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Access Control has greatly prevented the misuse of administrator rights which is very rampant."

"No, the product been stable and robust, and boasts with new additional features."

"It efficiently controls the access to the resources from the privileged user thus implementing the security aspects and this provides fine granular access."

"It depends on the client's requirements, but for me the most valuable one is the security access management with distributed architecture and centralized management."

"It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose."

"This product has improved the security of the corporate network and made compliance with the safety regulations of our country."

"We have been able to exceed our audit requirements for security."

"Access Control enhances the security of business systems through a secured authentication and validation of users credentials before accessing organizations resources."

More CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] pros

"CyberArk is a very important tool for my organization."

"This product helped our customer manage their privileged accounts; it is easier for them to manage and control the privileged accounts."

"Implementing CyberArk is not only rolling out a tool, it also will force the company to have a good look at the access management strategy, improve security processes and clean data."

"All the high privileged accounts are managed by CyberArk at a regular frequency."

"Session recordings and timestamps are valuable features. They allow me to specifically select the time a particular command was executed, so I do not have to review the entire recording. I can click on events to determine where and when they happened."

"Security is the solution's most valuable feature. As far as I know, this solution is the most secure system of this class on the market today, even considering another management system like Fudo Security, which we also use. The integration capabilities are very good; it helps strengthen our overall security."

"You can see the benefits of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager immediately."

"The biggest feature is the security of the overall solution. It's very secure. The vaulting technology and the number of security layers involved in the vault, where privileged accounts are actually stored, is the heart of the solution."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

Cons

"Automated deployment did not work as expected, had to go to a manual deployment."

"The manuals for this product used to be good. We could find in one place answers to pretty much every question or situation we had. However, it's now in piece-meal fashion."

"I found the installation process of Access Control challenging due to the much networking work involved in order to grant access to authorized users."

"We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment."

"Yes, I encountered lots of issues."

"User Interface needs to be improved."

"I have faced a few challenges due to the system complexity, as it involves two integrated authentication systems that have to be purchased."

"Sometimes we encounter issues whilst generating the reports."

"Some aspects of the administration need improvement, though they have recently made improvements to the API. However, the management with the interface and configuration are not so user-friendly. It has not changed much during all the years that CyberArk has been on the market. The management part, like platform management as well as PSM connectors definition and management, could be improved, even if it has already been done with the API."

"When I was a component owner for PAM's Privileged Threat Analytics (PTA) component, what I wanted was a clear mapping to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, a framework which has a comprehensive list of use cases. We reached out to the vendor and asked them how much coverage they have of the uses cases found on MITRE, which would have given us a better view of things while I was the product owner. Unfortunately they did not have the capability of mapping onto MITRE's framework at that time."

"As we have not yet moved to the core licensing model, we don't have the benefit of PSM and a few other things that were not previously included."

"The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time."

"Password Vault is much pricier than other solutions. A vendor team might struggle to explain why that price is justified. There are good alternatives that cost less."

"The solution that they proposed was not straightforward because of the backend processes of CyberArk."

"I would prefer that this is a fully-managed service, rather than have to manage the software ourselves and keep it up to date."

"With regards to potential improvements for the CyberArk product, I find the product quite expensive and I would like to see the cost reduced."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is more expensive than its competitors, such as BeyondTrust, Delinea, and ManageEngine PAM360."

"The price of CyberArk support could be a little bit less. Otherwise, pricing is fine."

"The pricing is slightly higher compared to other solutions, but it is reasonable because there are better security features."

"Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low."

"Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect."

"CyberArk is very expensive and there are additional fees for add-ons."

"If you want a Ferrari, it will cost you. The solution is really nice, so it costs the client, but in the long run, it is very good. If you buy a solution that costs a lot to maintain because it is not stable, and you are frequently asking for consultant support, it costs more."

"The solution is available at a high price"

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

905,526 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	175

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Privileged Access Manager vs CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL]

Compared 38% of the time

More CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Competitors

Safeguard by One Identity vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2026

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] report

Download CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

July 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Also Known As

CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

Overview

CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

Broadcom

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.

Rockwell Automation

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira by Palo Alto Networks, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

905,526 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.