CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Idira Privileged Access Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Broadcom and Idira by Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

CA Privileged Access Manage...

Read 9 CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews

25,894 Views
10,617 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CA Privileged Access Manage...

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] compete in the field of privileged access management. While Idira is recognized for its flexible pricing and responsive support, CA PAM Server Control [EOL] distinguishes itself with a more extensive feature set, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager provides comprehensive identity management, effective session monitoring, and detailed audit trails. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] supports granular access control, seamless platform integration, and advanced security policies to address complex security needs.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its security features, provide better integration with third-party applications, and expand its audit capabilities. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] can improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and lower its cost to increase accessibility for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] offers detailed documentation and robust support for smooth deployment. In contrast, Idira Privileged Access Manager features agile deployment and quick customer support, making it suitable for faster ROI with immediate implementation benefits.

Pricing and ROI: Idira Privileged Access Manager presents a lower initial setup cost and flexible pricing options, resulting in a fast ROI. Although CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] has a higher setup cost, it provides substantial long-term value thanks to its superior features, positioning it as a noteworthy investment for organizations seeking comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,517 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Privileged Access Manage...

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Idira Privileged Access Man...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

230

Ranking in other categories

User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (2nd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)

Featured Reviews

it_user558603

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.

I would like to see some improvements, specifically in terms of some set-up items. We have spoken to CA quite a bit about the ability to have 'always-on', or 'active/active' status options, so if the infrastructure goes down, we don't lose transactions. This is very important for the environment and for the users so we cannot really afford any downtime with the solution. We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment.

Read full review

Singaravelu C

CyberArk Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Provides full visibility into user activity and ensures secure end-to-end access across critical systems

In CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, I see room for improvement as I am working in the on-premises networks, and now we are also having the cloud-based PAM. So there, everything is maintained by the CyberArk Privileged Access Manager team, and we are only maintaining the PSM servers. So it is already upgraded from the on-premises network to the cloud network. If you ask me what we can implement beyond that, I just need a few minutes to think about what new things, because it is already an end-to-end security on-premises itself. Now, when it comes to PCloud, Privileged Cloud, it is more secure than the on-premises networks because most of the things are handled using the cloud itself. So it is an already upgraded version; we do not need to implement something new. But if you think in that way, we can have a chance to implement our things. If anything could be improved in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, I think we could build a small agent AI in my team, we could give access to these logs—the Vault logs, PSM logs, and CPM logs. Whenever the system is going down, the AI will automatically check. If we actually implement agent AI in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, it will check the logs, and if any errors are coming, it automatically triggers alerts and gives the solution. That is the best improvement I can think of because these days, most things are done by agent AI. So if we also implement this agent AI in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, we can add more features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Access Control enhances the security of business systems through a secured authentication and validation of users credentials before accessing organizations resources."

"No, the product been stable and robust, and boasts with new additional features."

"It efficiently controls the access to the resources from the privileged user thus implementing the security aspects and this provides fine granular access."

"It depends on the client's requirements, but for me the most valuable one is the security access management with distributed architecture and centralized management."

"This product has improved the security of the corporate network and made compliance with the safety regulations of our country."

"It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose."

"We're happy to see it working so well with our IBM solution, saving us time and costs."

"We have been able to exceed our audit requirements for security."

More CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] pros

"Since then, CyberArk's Privileged Access Management is still our central solution for the entire estate, including all our servers (Windows/Unix), databases, devices, and so on, with around 5,000 to 8,000 users globally."

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is excellent for meeting compliance and regulatory requirements."

"Creating policies and the password rotation feature have been valuable. We don't have to memorize our password for the ADM account."

"CyberArk PAM can be easily automated."

"The most valuable feature I find in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is that we can record the sessions. It provides flexible workflows. I can change the workflow to specify if it needs one approval or two approvals, and I can approve my peer."

"It is a scalable product."

"It's been a big win for us as we're now able to start managing service accounts with AIM."

"It gives us the capability to rotate passwords, which is the biggest thing because we do not want them being stagnant so every service account that we have needs to be rotated at least once a year."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros

Cons

"User Interface needs to be improved."

"We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment."

"Yes, I encountered lots of issues."

"The manuals for this product used to be good. We could find in one place answers to pretty much every question or situation we had. However, it's now in piece-meal fashion."

"Automated deployment did not work as expected, had to go to a manual deployment."

"I found the installation process of Access Control challenging due to the much networking work involved in order to grant access to authorized users."

"I have faced a few challenges due to the system complexity, as it involves two integrated authentication systems that have to be purchased."

"Sometimes we encounter issues whilst generating the reports."

"Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use."

"Maintaining the product is challenging. Upgrades require a lot of resources, as it impacts the entire organization. For example, upgrading components like the Privileged Session Manager (PSM) and the vault is time-consuming and difficult. In the long term, I would like to see these processes simplified, especially for on-premise installations."

"The installation process should be easier and more user-friendly so that you don't need to hire a third party to deploy it."

"CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well."

"Enhanced PSM support for Java based applications."

"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault can improve the distributive vault feature. Distributing the vault in multiple areas and multiple data centers should improve."

"PAM could be more user-friendly and CyberArk could update the documentation to include more real-world examples. You have to learn it yourself through trial and error. In particular, the online documentation should have more information about troubleshooting."

"The product is very vaulting-focused. I'd love to see it expanding its capabilities a bit further into areas like just-in-time elevation, and access with non-vaulted credentials."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"From a client perspective, CyberArk's pricing is fair but there is a significant increase each year. They should limit the price increase because this could potentially drive customers to other partners. Price changes should be at defined intervals. There should not be sudden jumps."

"Since CyberArk is at the top of the Gartner list, the cost is indeed on the higher side, but customers must discern which entities are essential to purchase. They should weigh the cost against the quality received."

"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is on the expensive side. It is very expensive."

"The solution is cost-effective for the features."

"I have heard from my leaders that CyberArk is costlier in terms of licensing. The support and maintenance are also costly. We use their premium support, but for the price we pay, we do not get the value."

"There are additional features added to our CyberArk Privileged Access Manager license. For example, features that allow us to integrate into various kinds of platforms."

"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is a very expensive product."

"I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product."

More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	42
Large Enterprise	175

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Privileged Access Manager vs CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL]

Compared 38% of the time

More CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Competitors

Safeguard by One Identity vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 3% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 2% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager

Compared 2% of the time

More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

August 2026

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] report

Download CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Idira Privileged Access Manager

August 2026

Download Idira Privileged Access Manager product report

Also Known As

CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager

CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault

Overview

CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.

Broadcom

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.

Rockwell Automation

Buyer's Guide

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira by Palo Alto Networks, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.