No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] vs Idira Privileged Access Manager comparison

Broadcom and Idira by Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.
Idira Privileged Access Man...
Read 230 Idira Privileged Access Manager reviews
  • 20,873 Views
  • 8,767 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Idira Privileged Access Manager and CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] compete in the field of privileged access management. While Idira is recognized for its flexible pricing and responsive support, CA PAM Server Control [EOL] distinguishes itself with a more extensive feature set, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Idira Privileged Access Manager provides comprehensive identity management, effective session monitoring, and detailed audit trails. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] supports granular access control, seamless platform integration, and advanced security policies to address complex security needs.

Room for Improvement: Idira could enhance its security features, provide better integration with third-party applications, and expand its audit capabilities. CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] can improve its user interface, reduce deployment complexity, and lower its cost to increase accessibility for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] offers detailed documentation and robust support for smooth deployment. In contrast, Idira Privileged Access Manager features agile deployment and quick customer support, making it suitable for faster ROI with immediate implementation benefits.

Pricing and ROI: Idira Privileged Access Manager presents a lower initial setup cost and flexible pricing options, resulting in a fast ROI. Although CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] has a higher setup cost, it provides substantial long-term value thanks to its superior features, positioning it as a noteworthy investment for organizations seeking comprehensive security solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: May 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
May 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 896,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Privileged Access Manage...
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Idira Privileged Access Man...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
230
Ranking in other categories
User Activity Monitoring (1st), Enterprise Password Managers (3rd), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (1st), Mainframe Security (1st), Operational Technology (OT) Security (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user558603 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user558603
Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
I like that the access control on the agent. Installation is difficult.
I would like to see some improvements, specifically in terms of some set-up items. We have spoken to CA quite a bit about the ability to have 'always-on', or 'active/active' status options, so if the infrastructure goes down, we don't lose transactions. This is very important for the environment and for the users so we cannot really afford any downtime with the solution. We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment.
Read full review
Atul-Gujar - PeerSpot reviewer
Atul-Gujar
CyberArk manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Secures critical infrastructures with essential user session audit records
A potential area for improvement is enhancing support for cluster environments and distributed Vaults. Clients in multiple countries that need central access have different challenges that require better solutions from CyberArk. For financial services, CyberArk can improve incident response by ensuring fast support for critical priority tickets to meet compliance requirements. Providing more documentation on CyberArk is recommended for new team members to enhance their troubleshooting capabilities. I understand it's up to the client, but 99% fail to change the demo key, so it's crucial for CyberArk to emphasize changing the key and documenting it as part of the installation process.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It gives us the ability to track who is using what ID and for what purpose."
"This product has improved the security of the corporate network and made compliance with the safety regulations of our country."
"It depends on the client's requirements, but for me the most valuable one is the security access management with distributed architecture and centralized management."
"We're happy to see it working so well with our IBM solution, saving us time and costs."
"Access Control enhances the security of business systems through a secured authentication and validation of users credentials before accessing organizations resources."
"Access Control has greatly prevented the misuse of administrator rights which is very rampant."
"We have been able to exceed our audit requirements for security."
"It efficiently controls the access to the resources from the privileged user thus implementing the security aspects and this provides fine granular access."
More CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] pros
"It has become one of the primary components that we have."
"Overall, as a partner in our digital transformation, CyberArk has been great."
"Rather than multiple tools for maintaining regulatory compliance around passwords and privileged accounts, we have centralized as much as possible with CyberArk. This is now a one stop shop for end users to access their elevated credentials."
"The most valuable feature is the special management. It records the activity and the actions that we use for auditing."
"We are able to rotate privileged user passwords to eliminate fraudulent use."
"With this product and the protection it offers, you can witness ROI immediately."
"I find the threat analytics is an important feature, as CyberArk can look at the log details and analyze who is using the applications, which are their locations, and which are the IP locations from which they are accessing, enabling the solution to find the exact location the threat is emanating from, which we really value."
"AIM has been a great help in automating password retrieval which removes the need for hard-coded credentials."
More Idira Privileged Access Manager pros
 

Cons

"The manuals for this product used to be good. We could find in one place answers to pretty much every question or situation we had. However, it's now in piece-meal fashion."
"I have faced a few challenges due to the system complexity, as it involves two integrated authentication systems that have to be purchased."
"We have had problems with deployment, and we are concerned with the possibility for outages and how they can have a negative impact on the environment."
"Yes, I encountered lots of issues."
"Automated deployment did not work as expected, had to go to a manual deployment."
"I found the installation process of Access Control challenging due to the much networking work involved in order to grant access to authorized users."
"User Interface needs to be improved."
"Sometimes we encounter issues whilst generating the reports."
"The continuous scanning of the assets is limited to Windows and Unix. We like to have the solution scan any databases, network devices, and security devices for privileged accounts. That would be very helpful."
"It is easily customized, and that customization makes it very easy to start trying to shoehorn the solution into roles it was never intended to fill."
"As we have not yet moved to the core licensing model, we don't have the benefit of PSM and a few other things that were not previously included."
"The initial setup is pretty difficult and it takes a while to put into place."
"One area for improvement is the user interface. It needs significant enhancements."
"The usual workload on the system is sometimes delayed by CyberArk, so any major work is getting delayed and may take twice the amount of time that it usually does."
"Upgrading the product is very difficult, so this could be an area for improvement."
"We would like to expand the usage of the auto discovery accounts feed, then on our end, tie in the REST API for automation."
More Idira Privileged Access Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It's per-company, license-based."
"If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it."
"The solution is costly but we get what we pay for."
"If you want a Ferrari, it will cost you. The solution is really nice, so it costs the client, but in the long run, it is very good. If you buy a solution that costs a lot to maintain because it is not stable, and you are frequently asking for consultant support, it costs more."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"The price of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager could be less expensive."
"The price of this solution is quite reasonable."
"The product's licensing is yearly. I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
More Idira Privileged Access Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
896,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business59
Midsize Enterprise42
Large Enterprise174
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?
We evaluated Sailpoint IdentityIQ before ultimately choosing CyberArk. Sailpoint Identity Platform is a solution to manage risks in cloud enterprise environments. It automates and streamlines the m...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
My thoughts on the pricing of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager depend entirely on the vendors' requirements. If they want their things to be secure, they have to spend accordingly. We have four t...
See all answers
What needs improvement with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?
I believe account discovery and rolling support need to be improved. Account discovery is important when integrating with other systems, as other PAM solutions can perform account discovery and onb...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Symantec Privileged Access Manager vs CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Logo
Symantec Privileged Access Manager vs CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL]
Compared 40% of the time
More CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] Competitors
One Identity Safeguard vs Idira Privileged Access Manager Logo
One Identity Safeguard vs Idira Privileged Access Manager
Compared 4% of the time
Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager Logo
Teleport vs Idira Privileged Access Manager
Compared 3% of the time
Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager Logo
Delinea Secret Server vs Idira Privileged Access Manager
Compared 3% of the time
Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager Logo
Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Idira Privileged Access Manager
Compared 3% of the time
Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager Logo
Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Idira Privileged Access Manager
Compared 3% of the time
More Idira Privileged Access Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
May 2026
CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] reportDownload CA Privileged Access Manager Server Control [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Idira Privileged Access Manager
May 2026
Idira Privileged Access Manager reportDownload Idira Privileged Access Manager product report
 

Also Known As

CA Access Control, CA Privileged Identity Manager
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
 

Overview

CA Access Control provides tools to protect your system in both ways against unauthorized use of computer resources: block unauthorized users from accessing the system and block authorized users from accessing items to which they should not have access. CA Access Control also provides auditing tools that let you trace users' activities to track attempted misuse of the computer system.
Broadcom

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager safeguards privileged accounts through password management, credential rotation, and session recording. With seamless integration and real-time monitoring, it ensures robust security across platforms.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is recognized for its extensive capabilities in managing and securing privileged accounts. It offers vital functionalities such as automatic password rotation, real-time session monitoring, and cross-platform integration through APIs and custom connectors. Users find the flexibility in workflows and granular access controls beneficial, particularly in protecting access across cloud and on-prem infrastructures. However, improvements in its interface, installation process, plugin support, and integration with third-party tools are often suggested. Pricing is a concern for many, along with the need for better dashboard reporting, user provisioning, and enhanced documentation. Organizations leverage this tool for encrypting and monitoring critical account activities and automating password management to bolster security.

What are the key features of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager?

  • Enterprise Password Vault: Provides secure storage and management of enterprise credentials.
  • Privilege Session Manager: Offers comprehensive session recording and monitoring.
  • Privileged Threat Analytics: Detects and alerts on potential credential threats.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with multiple systems using APIs and custom connectors.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

  • Enhanced Security: Automates and centralizes password management, reducing risk of account misuse.
  • Compliance Support: Ensures alignment with compliance policies through automated processes.
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines security operations with real-time monitoring and integration.
  • Adaptability: Protects privileged access across diverse infrastructure setups including cloud and on-prem.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager finds substantial use in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where the protection of privileged accounts is critical. These sectors rely on its capabilities to manage application credentials securely and provide safe access for developers, administrators, and vendors across various infrastructures.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Colruyt Group, Logicalis, TIS Inc.
Rockwell Automation
Buyer's Guide
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
May 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, Okta and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: May 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
896,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.