No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA NetQoS Performance Center [EOL] vs DX Spectrum comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA NetQoS Performance Cente...
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
DX Spectrum
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
118
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (7th), Network Monitoring Software (17th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (18th), Network Troubleshooting (6th), DX NetOps (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

AS
Netrwork Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Multiple modules provide information on everything from TCP packets to latency but report generation is slow
CA Application Delivery Analysis (ADA) When it comes to application and client slowness, this module is able to monitor and analyze TCP packets between clients and servers, providing network metrics, latency, TTL and more. It comes with a friendly GUI, filter, and report function, is easy for management level to understand, and helps network engineers narrow down the problem area. CA Network Flow Analysis (NFA) This module gives you both live and historical network traffic data. Shows which application IP, protocol, or client IP is using the bandwidth, or whether it is an ISP issue. CA NetVoyant Some applications are very sensitive to latency, jitter and bandwidth (they cannot mix with other traffic). This module helps by providing device status, device metrics, and device utilization. CA Event Manager For critical processes that we may need to monitor 24/7, this module helps collect alarms, traps and log streams. This enables the operations team take action quickly.
PinchasAlbalya - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
Monitoring has become centralized and management now sees real‑time health of key network assets
The time investment required is significant, not because of difficulty but because of the need for free time to invest in it. We need to get the knowledge. We know there are many options, but we took an external vendor to install and make the customization. If we want to make others changes without paying for customization, we need to learn it deeply by ourselves. The tutorials are very complicated. They could work on that area. The tutorial part could be more simplified. I know there are many explanations, and you can get help or documents in one click on the current page in the product, but it is not very clear. If you want to do something new that you did not see from the vendor in the installation, it is not very simple. The documents are good for people that know how to operate the product well, but for new users, it is not simple.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature I think is the ability to go in and perform updates yourself."
"One of the key benefits is doing the performance management piece where you can track the utilization of network connections and see where your block points are, and if you have errors happening that affect performance that you don't necessarily see as alarms."
"As we get more and more into what it can do, it's met everything that we've wanted at this point."
"If you need solid data and reporting for management, planning, and troubleshooting, this could be the right product."
"The ability to monitor your WAN and LAN infrastructure in a simple GUI."
"Without a doubt the most valuable feature of this solution is its scalability."
"Some of the most valuable features are it's highly scalable, the carrier is great, and if something has SNMP, it can monitor it. It's a great network fault management solution."
"As a user of it, it's been fantastic just because it does so many things all in one configuration section."
"CA Spectrum is very useful for event handling and offers a robust manager of managers console."
"An organization using DX Spectrum is more easily able to understand the root cause when something happens in its environment."
"The integration point."
"Generally, I would recommend DX Spectrum because, despite its pricing issue, it is a valuable solution."
 

Cons

"Reports can take a long time to generate."
"I'd like more ease-of-use."
"It would be really nice if you could do multiple domain authentication as opposed to just a single domain."
"So, I guess a more organized view of all the data that it provides would be an improvement we'd want."
"DX Spectrum needs better documentation on its complex features."
"Reporting and network bandwidth monitoring features needs to be improved."
"It's not the best product for availability and outages reporting."
"Code is very complex."
"The GIS map feature needs to be enhanced and synced with topology views of containers and global collections."
"It's not a great performance management tool. Its reporting capabilities are not very good at all."
"The price of DX Spectrum is not competitive when compared to other solutions, such as SolarWinds. The high price has caused us to lose many deals."
"It took a while to understand the product, but once we went hands on, it's great to work with."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Spectrum is expensive."
"Since the acquisition by Broadcom, we have not had such a good experience with licensing and pricing. Since they were bought by Broadcom, every sales contract is getting complicated. It's very complicated, and it's much more expensive than before. It's not a good pricing strategy from Broadcom."
"It’s a great tool, but an expensive one. Learn how to use it properly."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"In general, the license cost will be about 30% of the total TCO for this tool (hardware/support team, OS costs, and OS management)."
"DX Spectrum's pricing depends on the license number. It is affordable."
"It is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business25
Midsize Enterprise19
Large Enterprise90
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with DX Spectrum?
The time investment required is significant, not because of difficulty but because of the need for free time to invest in it. We need to get the knowledge. We know there are many options, but we to...
What is your primary use case for DX Spectrum?
The university purchased DX Spectrum, called ICE. DX Spectrum NAC is working for us only on Cisco 9200 switches. It is not working on any other switch like C1000 or HG or any 2960X. Even other Cisc...
 

Also Known As

NetQoS Performance Center
CA Spectrum
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Empowered Networks, Logicalis
National Informatics Centre India, Banese, Olympus, AlphaServe Technologies, Sicredi
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.