We performed a comparison between Broadcom Test Data Manager and Delphix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Data Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."TDM allows us to find the right test data for the test that we need, and then it also allows us to get the required data inputs into our API test, so that we can do a full test."
"I like the integration a lot. We use the test matching feature and the ability to make and find data."
"The most valuable feature is the Portal that comes with the tool. That helps make it look much more user-friendly for the users. Also its ease of use - even for developers it's not that complicated."
"The masking of data has really been key for us to be able to replace PII with fake values."
"The combination of extract, mask, and load, along with synthetic data, is what is generally needed by any of our clients, and CA TDM has really good compatibility in both of the areas."
"The synthetic data generation is really good... You can write rules and create permutations and combinations according to your needs. Or you can take a snippet of the Prod data and replicate it."
"It allows us to create a testing environment that is repeatable. And we can manage the data so that our testing becomes automated, everything from actually performing the testing to also evaluating the results."
"The initial setup was straightforward. Basically, just install, next, and start using it."
"Delphix's data distribution is powerful. It's easy to distribute data with this solution. The main advantage of Delphix is that it generates copies of data."
"It is a stable solution."
"Delphix's technical support is fairly knowledgeable."
"Delphix interfaces are simple to use and very user friendly."
"It provides the ability to roll back to a point in time or roll forward without the assistance of a DBA."
"The performance offered by the product, its price, and its ability to handle structured and unstructured data were good when compared to the other products in the market."
"The product is efficient in handling large volumes of data."
"Data being available anytime is a life changer."
"They could make it easier to model databases, because right now it is really technical, so to train someone on it takes a while."
"The integration with various utilities is also really important. That still has to happen. That's a major area for improvement."
"They should make the Portal a little more user-friendly, make it even easier to configure things directly from the Portal."
"Get everything centralized into the portal."
"When we publish a lot data into the target, sometimes it is not able to handle it."
"As the solution continues to evolve, the one thing I like about it is the API-friendly layers that they have added into the realm. So, I just would like to see more support around that and more usability."
"There are different modules for masking. There is a portal and there is a standalone application as well. The standalone application is more old-fashioned. When you write rules on this old-fashioned interface, because it has more complex functions available for use, you can't migrate them to the portal."
"Needs a better fit and finish."
"As a commercial model, it's very good. However, maybe it would be nice for Delphix to integrate with some other platforms."
"The solution's price needs improvement."
"One thing I would like to see improved is the unusual error messages we receive and some slowness we have while we are updating."
"The solution’s self-service portal must be more interactive and user-friendly."
"When it comes to unstructured and structured data, if Delphix can comply with the requirements for most of the structured data, it would be good, especially if it can include the data scanning part."
"Delphix is quite expensive."
"My only complaint about this solution is the price."
"Delphix is a strong solution for virtualization, but it's not strong enough for creating data, so we have to use another solution for creating new data."
Broadcom Test Data Manager is ranked 2nd in Test Data Management with 32 reviews while Delphix is ranked 1st in Test Data Management with 15 reviews. Broadcom Test Data Manager is rated 8.4, while Delphix is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Test Data Manager writes "Helps to create synthetic data and new data sets ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Delphix writes "Handles large volumes of data with ease, but the self-service portal must be more user-friendly". Broadcom Test Data Manager is most compared with IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM), Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Tricentis Tosca, DATPROF and K2View, whereas Delphix is most compared with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Denodo, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM), Actifio and Oracle GoldenGate. See our Broadcom Test Data Manager vs. Delphix report.
See our list of best Test Data Management vendors and best Data Masking vendors.
We monitor all Test Data Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.