No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 27.0%, down from 32.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 11.0%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization27.0%
ReadyAPI Virtualization11.0%
Other62.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Ravi Raushan Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at ValueMomentum
Virtual services have accelerated parallel API testing and have improved complex integration coverage
ReadyAPI Virtualization is especially useful in CI/CD and parallel development workflows because teams can test independently without blocking each other. It also helps simulate edge cases and failure scenarios more safely, improving overall test coverage and system availability before production release. The best features of ReadyAPI Virtualization include services mocking and simulations of complex API behaviors along with integrations with automated testing workflows. I especially value the ability to simulate unavailable or third-party services and create realistic response scenarios and test failure conditions, such as delays or errors, which is very helpful as virtualization integrates well with API functional testing, helping improve development speeds and test coverage. I find the environment flexibility and reusable virtual services very valuable in ReadyAPI Virtualization, as they make it easier for multiple teams to test in parallel and reduce dependency on shared staging systems, improving overall development efficiency. ReadyAPI Virtualization positively impacts my organization by reducing development and testing delays through the removal of dependencies on unavailable or incomplete services, improving parallel development, increasing test coverage, and allowing teams to identify integration issues earlier, which speeds up delivery cycles and enhances overall system reliability before production release. As a result of using ReadyAPI Virtualization, I see faster integration testing and reduced waiting time for dependent services, which significantly improves delivery speed. It also reduces environment-related blockers and catches integration issues earlier, leading to fewer bugs reaching later testing stages or production. Additionally, automated and parallel testing workflows reduce manual effort for QA and development teams.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This helps my team in virtualizing responses so we are not dependent on the systems when they are down."
"Service virtualization is the most valuable feature because we can create end-to-end services without actual hardware, so that saves a lot of cost and money."
"The CAI aka Pathfinder is a great capability and will help the organization to achieve SV goals and expand the SV to different systems without many firewall changes or changes in the existing environment setup."
"The most valuable feature for us is that it provides configuration settings to make connections to the DB and web services, and because it has pre-written code exposed through a UI, it makes it much easier to configure tests."
"The features that I find most useful would be how easy it is to quickly get something up and running as a small test sample."
"I would recommend others to use CA Service Virtualization for all their virtualization needs as it is easy to use and the support provided via the CA Communities is also great."
"Having a virtual service to rely on, we’re able to continue development even when one of their services fails."
"Easy to understand ways of creating stubs."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"Very good for the price point and compared to more expensive or custom development solutions."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"The technical support is good."
 

Cons

"The UI is a pain point. If they had a better UI, it would have a much higher rating."
"I would rate the tech support a nine out of ten. They need more knowledge about the connectivity to DevOps orchestration."
"The things that we're interested mostly are deployment kinds of capability."
"Licensing definitely needs more flexible models. Too many complicated parameters also makes it difficult for us to explain them to our customers."
"They still need to improve the reporting functionality for better customization."
"As of today, none of the Microsoft technologies are supported."
"DevTest is pretty massive. It's hard to tell what different parts of it can be used to do different things. They should modulize it more."
"One major feature I would like to see is on the user administration part. Right now, anybody can access any of the folders and any of the projects."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
906,887 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments. The UI and configurations for complex virtual services can sometimes feel heavy or difficult...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
My advice to others looking into using ReadyAPI Virtualization is to use it when your team depends heavily on multiple APIs, third-party services, or microservices integrations, as it is especially...
What is your primary use case for SmartBear ServiceV Pro?
My main use case for ReadyAPI Virtualization is service visualizations and API testing for backend and microservices-based systems. I use ReadyAPI Virtualization to simulate dependent services and ...
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
906,887 professionals have used our research since 2012.