No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 26.8%, down from 30.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 12.2%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization26.8%
ReadyAPI Virtualization12.2%
Other61.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has helped our organization in term of its availability and being able to create systems immediately."
"Service virtualization is the most valuable feature for us because there are fewer constraints through the SDLC cycle."
"CA Service Virtualization is totally number one in the market, no one comes close to this."
"Very easy to create virtual services for test, Dev and training environments."
"We have had developers produce code later than we wanted to, but we've had some other stuff that was dependent on that. So what we were able to do was virtualize these assets and then go forward with our developer and not have to wait for these additional services to be available."
"Think “outside the box” when you think about how this product can be used."
"Without trying other products in the service virtualize space, I feel very comfortable working with this product."
"In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"The technical support is good."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"Very good for the price point and compared to more expensive or custom development solutions."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
 

Cons

"It's not really meant for Services Testing and reporting functionality from the CA SV console - it's a very basic one."
"The concept of agent installation is a tedious process and should have been much simpler."
"Parsers, look and feel need improvement."
"It could be easier to setup and to deploy."
"Their knowledge management system is not up to the mark. The search functionality really needs to be improved."
"The user interface and usability of the tool is not the best. They could definitely be improved upon in the next release."
"Licensing definitely needs more flexible models. Too many complicated parameters also makes it difficult for us to explain them to our customers."
"The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
14%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments. The UI and configurations for complex virtual services can sometimes feel heavy or difficult...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
My advice to others looking into using ReadyAPI Virtualization is to use it when your team depends heavily on multiple APIs, third-party services, or microservices integrations, as it is especially...
What is your primary use case for SmartBear ServiceV Pro?
My main use case for ReadyAPI Virtualization is service visualizations and API testing for backend and microservices-based systems. I use ReadyAPI Virtualization to simulate dependent services and ...
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.