No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 27.7%, down from 35.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 11.3%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization27.7%
ReadyAPI Virtualization11.3%
Other61.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Ravi Raushan Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at ValueMomentum
Virtual services have accelerated parallel API testing and have improved complex integration coverage
ReadyAPI Virtualization is especially useful in CI/CD and parallel development workflows because teams can test independently without blocking each other. It also helps simulate edge cases and failure scenarios more safely, improving overall test coverage and system availability before production release. The best features of ReadyAPI Virtualization include services mocking and simulations of complex API behaviors along with integrations with automated testing workflows. I especially value the ability to simulate unavailable or third-party services and create realistic response scenarios and test failure conditions, such as delays or errors, which is very helpful as virtualization integrates well with API functional testing, helping improve development speeds and test coverage. I find the environment flexibility and reusable virtual services very valuable in ReadyAPI Virtualization, as they make it easier for multiple teams to test in parallel and reduce dependency on shared staging systems, improving overall development efficiency. ReadyAPI Virtualization positively impacts my organization by reducing development and testing delays through the removal of dependencies on unavailable or incomplete services, improving parallel development, increasing test coverage, and allowing teams to identify integration issues earlier, which speeds up delivery cycles and enhances overall system reliability before production release. As a result of using ReadyAPI Virtualization, I see faster integration testing and reduced waiting time for dependent services, which significantly improves delivery speed. It also reduces environment-related blockers and catches integration issues earlier, leading to fewer bugs reaching later testing stages or production. Additionally, automated and parallel testing workflows reduce manual effort for QA and development teams.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CA Service Virtualization has helped us advance the development cycle when third-party interfaces are not available to us."
"It is definitely scalable."
"For us, the most valuable feature is that it gives us the ability to virtualize a lot of our integrated systems."
"This helps my team in virtualizing responses so we are not dependent on the systems when they are down."
"Thus it saves a lot of my time and if I am using any third-party services, then it saves me money as well."
"The CAI aka Pathfinder is a great capability and will help the organization to achieve SV goals and expand the SV to different systems without many firewall changes or changes in the existing environment setup."
"I would advise others who are looking for a similar solution to go for this product."
"You can create virtual services from a live recording or convert raw traffic into request/response pairs."
"Very good for the price point and compared to more expensive or custom development solutions."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"The technical support is good."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
 

Cons

"UI should be more user friendly: better usability, more testing oriented."
"​From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"It was purchased from another larger corporate project and just kind of sat there, paid for but on the shelf."
"We once faced issues when we moved from 4.2 to 4.7 or 5. They completely changed the UI and there is very little support for backward compatibility."
"Stability’s one area that needs work; it's good, but the challenge is that scaling at a very high level is slightly problematic at this point in time."
"The REST test step could include other methods."
"The biggest area of improvement is in the licensing. The licensing costs are very high."
"We had to implement an external service catalog. We put it in ServiceNow. I would like to see an integrated service catalog."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"This solution has few features for customization."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"This product is worth the cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
896,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
896,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.