No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 26.8%, down from 30.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 12.2%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization26.8%
ReadyAPI Virtualization12.2%
Other61.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's the ability to capture and replay traffic that's most valuable to us."
"Its integration capabilities with other external tools and technologies - such as Selenium, JDBC, external JARs (which can be placed in /HotDeploy and used) - is quite impressive, as is its wide range of support for various protocols, such as FTP, FTPS, HTTP to TCP, etc."
"The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services, especially in creating IBM MQ virtual services through recording."
"My rating reflects the flexibility that it gives, the easy deployment and the easy maintenance of it."
"Service virtualization is the most valuable feature to me; it helped us to start the performance testing activities much earlier in the testing life cycle."
"For us, the most valuable feature is that it gives us the ability to virtualize a lot of our integrated systems."
"We are able to quickly scale our requests. We have tested across thousands of requests. We have had no problems so far."
"The tool always had some additional features included in each of its releases and it fixed the bugs of the previous release."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"The technical support is good."
"The solution is very easy to use."
 

Cons

"IMS services in version 7.5.2 are quite unstable."
"The biggest area of improvement is in the licensing. The licensing costs are very high."
"The GUI can be hard to navigate."
"CA actually releases a new version every year. We had issues with the upgrade prior to the latest one."
"Customer service in Italian is not very useful."
"We need to get more and more types of services because this is a multidisciplinary platform."
"We had issues in the support for virtualization of JDBC connectivity."
"Stability is getting better. When we first started with it, there were some bugs."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
24%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
13%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments. The UI and configurations for complex virtual services can sometimes feel heavy or difficult...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
My advice to others looking into using ReadyAPI Virtualization is to use it when your team depends heavily on multiple APIs, third-party services, or microservices integrations, as it is especially...
What is your primary use case for SmartBear ServiceV Pro?
My main use case for ReadyAPI Virtualization is service visualizations and API testing for backend and microservices-based systems. I use ReadyAPI Virtualization to simulate dependent services and ...
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.