No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 27.0%, down from 32.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 11.0%, down from 14.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization27.0%
ReadyAPI Virtualization11.0%
Other62.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Ravi Raushan Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at ValueMomentum
Virtual services have accelerated parallel API testing and have improved complex integration coverage
ReadyAPI Virtualization is especially useful in CI/CD and parallel development workflows because teams can test independently without blocking each other. It also helps simulate edge cases and failure scenarios more safely, improving overall test coverage and system availability before production release. The best features of ReadyAPI Virtualization include services mocking and simulations of complex API behaviors along with integrations with automated testing workflows. I especially value the ability to simulate unavailable or third-party services and create realistic response scenarios and test failure conditions, such as delays or errors, which is very helpful as virtualization integrates well with API functional testing, helping improve development speeds and test coverage. I find the environment flexibility and reusable virtual services very valuable in ReadyAPI Virtualization, as they make it easier for multiple teams to test in parallel and reduce dependency on shared staging systems, improving overall development efficiency. ReadyAPI Virtualization positively impacts my organization by reducing development and testing delays through the removal of dependencies on unavailable or incomplete services, improving parallel development, increasing test coverage, and allowing teams to identify integration issues earlier, which speeds up delivery cycles and enhances overall system reliability before production release. As a result of using ReadyAPI Virtualization, I see faster integration testing and reduced waiting time for dependent services, which significantly improves delivery speed. It also reduces environment-related blockers and catches integration issues earlier, leading to fewer bugs reaching later testing stages or production. Additionally, automated and parallel testing workflows reduce manual effort for QA and development teams.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is definitely how quickly you can get up and mock something that’s not completely done."
"Scalability has actually worked well and we are able to bring it to multiple environments."
"There are several areas that are easily configurable."
"You can create virtual services from a live recording or you can even take raw traffic and convert that into request/response pairs, and you can create an entire virtual service from just those simple little files, and that's super awesome when that all works out."
"CA has a great technical support team who really take control of a problem until it is solved."
"CA Service Virtualization is totally number one in the market, no one comes close to this."
"The tool always had some additional features included in each of its releases and it fixed the bugs of the previous release."
"One of the things I like about it is it actually does what it claims to do."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"ReadyAPI Virtualization positively impacts my organization by reducing development and testing delays through the removal of dependencies on unavailable or incomplete services, improving parallel development, increasing test coverage, and allowing teams to identify integration issues earlier, which speeds up delivery cycles and enhances overall system reliability before production release."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
 

Cons

"The overall installation architecture should be simplified."
"There is need to improve the DevTest Workstation with UI-based testing features."
"Pricing/licenses are very expensive, especially performance VSE, which is kind of foolish, especially if you use DevTest as a test driver too."
"More examples of portal-based virtualization."
"Cross-browser support is not that good for that portal."
"It consumes more memory and makes the system very slow, which was stopping simultaneous execution."
"The concept of agent installation is a tedious process and should have been much simpler."
"UI Testing and Reporting Features."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
904,054 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Construction Company
14%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments. The UI and configurations for complex virtual services can sometimes feel heavy or difficult...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
My advice to others looking into using ReadyAPI Virtualization is to use it when your team depends heavily on multiple APIs, third-party services, or microservices integrations, as it is especially...
What is your primary use case for SmartBear ServiceV Pro?
My main use case for ReadyAPI Virtualization is service visualizations and API testing for backend and microservices-based systems. I use ReadyAPI Virtualization to simulate dependent services and ...
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
904,054 professionals have used our research since 2012.