No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 25.7%, down from 26.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 13.9%, down from 17.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization25.7%
ReadyAPI Virtualization13.9%
Other60.4%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We used a lot of other solutions, but switched to CA Service Virtualization because this one tool can cover all of our requirements."
"Over the past 3 years which I've been using it, I've found it to be a good solution."
"CA technical support and DevTest community people love to respond and come up with a number of suggestions, which is really appreciated."
"Specifically, service virtualization has reduced infrastructure costs by close to 40% and helps in early problem detection and early fix, leading to early product release."
"It provides us a high level of integration with all of our solutions, to the extent that we can set up modules with Service Virtualization functionality at the same time."
"We have saved a lot in terms of the time it takes to test data setup infrastructure and turn around time for testing."
"DevTest supports multiple testing environments so you can configure it to use one testing environment or 20, and you can change it for use in any other environments with the flick of a button."
"It's the ability to capture and replay traffic that's most valuable to us."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Very good for the price point and compared to more expensive or custom development solutions."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"The technical support is good."
 

Cons

"It is not a stable solution."
"There have been some issues with Service Virtualization, but I would have to ask the team for more specific details."
"Sometimes, different versions of tools differ in behavior and new versions don't completely provide backwards compatibility."
"CA SV takes up lot of your system resources."
"Scalability is the reason I rated it as 8/10. We’re going through some challenges with scalability right now."
"However, it's a pretty heavyweight tool for my personal needs."
"Usability in the prior version that we used, version 8.2, usability is not great."
"There were problems where it doesn't support the technology. We have to write custom functions ourselves."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments. The UI and configurations for complex virtual services can sometimes feel heavy or difficult...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
My advice to others looking into using ReadyAPI Virtualization is to use it when your team depends heavily on multiple APIs, third-party services, or microservices integrations, as it is especially...
What is your primary use case for SmartBear ServiceV Pro?
My main use case for ReadyAPI Virtualization is service visualizations and API testing for backend and microservices-based systems. I use ReadyAPI Virtualization to simulate dependent services and ...
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.