No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Service Virtualiza...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 26.8%, down from 30.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 12.2%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization26.8%
ReadyAPI Virtualization12.2%
Other61.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Testing using Service Virtualization saved huge amounts."
"You can have a lot of different people with different technologies use the tool, without any programming experience at all, all the way up to people who can program. And then, the more technical that you are, the more programming you have, the more you're able to customize the tool."
"Having a virtual service to rely on, we’re able to continue development even when one of their services fails."
"It is definitely scalable."
"Clients were able to save $700k and three million GBP in the first year of using the solution."
"This product helps us to simulate broken or nonexistent systems, avoid latency between projects, and perform load-bearing testing on unavailable external systems."
"I think it definitely helps us reduce time to market, and in terms of dollar savings it helps us quite a bit."
"Service virtualization is the most valuable feature because we can create end-to-end services without actual hardware, so that saves a lot of cost and money."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
"The technical support is good."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
 

Cons

"They still need to improve the reporting functionality for better customization."
"I really want to see more of the "express" kind of model, where you get a little bit for free. I'd love to be able to see you be able to edit and author tests without having to be connected to a licensed server. And then, if you want to go and execute tests, then you go and connect to the server... I think it would unblock people to be able to do a lot more work from home or from remote places, where they can't really connect to the server."
"The user interface and usability of the tool is not the best. They could definitely be improved upon in the next release."
"IMS services in version 7.5.2 are quite unstable."
"I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."
"We had issues in the support for virtualization of JDBC connectivity."
"CA SV takes up lot of your system resources."
"UI testing needs improvements."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
14%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments. The UI and configurations for complex virtual services can sometimes feel heavy or difficult...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
My advice to others looking into using ReadyAPI Virtualization is to use it when your team depends heavily on multiple APIs, third-party services, or microservices integrations, as it is especially...
What is your primary use case for SmartBear ServiceV Pro?
My main use case for ReadyAPI Virtualization is service visualizations and API testing for backend and microservices-based systems. I use ReadyAPI Virtualization to simulate dependent services and ...
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Service Virtualization vs. ReadyAPI Virtualization and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
912,069 professionals have used our research since 2012.