Orchestrated Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Orchestrated Service Virtua...
Ranking in Service Virtualization
6th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Virtualization
Ranking in Service Virtualization
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Orchestrated Service Virtualization is 3.8%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 11.5%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

DW
Dec 9, 2021
Live connectivity benefits but is lacking customization options
Our primary use of the solution is for mocking of API codes One feature we like is the live connectivity of the product. In other words, you can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data. We haven't used the product…
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 26, 2022
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data."
"The technical support is good."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
 

Cons

"The initial setup was complex."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
31%
Computer Software Company
22%
Insurance Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with ReadyAPI Virtualization?
The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman. The overall picture the solution provides could use additional enhancements.
What advice do you have for others considering ReadyAPI Virtualization?
The solution handles APIs differently than Postman, so get familiar with it before you use it. I recommend the solution and rate it a seven out of ten.
 

Also Known As

No data available
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Allianz, Siemens, Bosch, Commerz Real, Toyota
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Broadcom, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.