ReadyAPI Virtualization vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

SmartBear and Tricentis are both solutions in the Service Virtualization category. SmartBear is ranked #5, while Tricentis is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. SmartBear holds a 13.9% mindshare in SV, compared to Tricentis’s 12.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

ReadyAPI Virtualization

Read 7 ReadyAPI Virtualization reviews

377 Views
377 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 113 Tricentis Tosca reviews

18,615 Views
186 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Virtualization

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Tricentis Tosca and ReadyAPI Virtualization compete in the software testing market. ReadyAPI Virtualization is preferred for its strong features and value, despite a higher price, whereas Tricentis Tosca offers cost-effectiveness and strong support.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers model-based test automation, a scriptless interface, and compatibility with multiple DevOps tools. ReadyAPI Virtualization excels in API simulation, supports advanced performance testing, and has strong scripting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could enhance its user interface and mobile testing capabilities and reduce deployment complexity. ReadyAPI Virtualization may improve by offering clearer documentation, optimizing performance for complex APIs, and simplifying advanced configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca is flexible and supports multiple environments, making deployment straightforward, with reliable customer support. ReadyAPI Virtualization has an easy deployment process, although advanced configurations can be challenging, and offers strong automation support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is more cost-effective with lower setup costs and high ROI through reduced testing time. ReadyAPI Virtualization has a higher initial cost but offers significant long-term gains through advanced API features.

To learn more, read our detailed ReadyAPI Virtualization vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Virtualization vs. Tricentis Tosca

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,606 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ReadyAPI Virtualization

Ranking in Service Virtualization

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Service Virtualization

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 13.9%, up from 11.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 12.8%, up from 11.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Service Virtualization Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tricentis Tosca	12.8%
ReadyAPI Virtualization	13.9%
Other	73.3%

Service Virtualization

Featured Reviews

Venkata Yedida

Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming

My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2740515

Senior Software Engineer 2 at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automation test development becomes accessible and effective for functional testers

Tricentis Tosca is a codeless tool, making it easy for everyone to understand the transition of how to develop scenarios or test cases. In Tricentis Tosca, analyzing failures is straightforward because every time it fails somewhere, I get the screenshot, which helps me analyze how and why it failed. It has all the modules, including some pre-built ones that can be reused efficiently. Compared to other code tools such as Selenium, where I used to develop one script in one day, with Tricentis Tosca I can easily develop one script in four hours or three hours, saving four to five hours in a day.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very easy to use."

"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."

"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."

"The technical support is good."

"Discovery option to create virtual services."

"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."

"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."

"Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people."

"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."

"The solution is script-less, so you don't need IT knowledge to use the solution in an operational way. This is the most valuable feature. It's also only one of two or three tools that can do good automation on SAP, and in my opinion, it's the best of those."

"I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. We have enterprise-level customers."

"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."

"The use of automation is most valuable."

"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."

"The product enables codeless automation."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."

"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"

"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."

"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."

"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."

"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."

"Primarily I'm dealing with customers looking for a cheap solution, and they are willing to try open-source automation solutions. So from this perspective, the price of Tosca is not as competitive."

"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."

"I have found that some of the functions could be missed in the solution for new users. They are not obviously present."

"In Tosca, I see that there are no user guides."

"They can make it more stable. I have used this tool for SAP applications. They have an alliance with SAP, and it mostly worked fine, but there were a few glitches. However, we got the required support from the Tricentis team. They are coming up with their new versions and upgrades with respect to how the Tricentis systems as cloud applications are updated, and it would be good if they have a robust accelerator pack."

"The issue is that even though the components are tightly integrated, object identification can be quite slow, sometimes taking five to ten seconds."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."

"While the initial setup was straightforward, we required assistance with the configuration to ensure that everything was done correctly."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is worth the cost."

"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."

"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."

"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

"The tool is expensive. It has become overpriced, especially after Tricentis Tosca grew as a company. Initially, we bought a license with an annual support fee, which wasn't too expensive. However, they changed the model, and now we have to purchase a license yearly, which has become quite costly."

"I am satisfied with the cost."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive tool and the licensing is not simple."

"A yearly license costs around 20,000 euros."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is on the higher side."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	72

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Parasoft Virtualize vs ReadyAPI Virtualization

Compared 38% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization

Compared 27% of the time

More ReadyAPI Virtualization Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 5% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

February 2026

Download ReadyAPI Virtualization product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

January 2026

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

ServiceV Pro

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

API virtualization in ServiceV Pro helps you deliver great APIs on time and under budget, and does so for a fraction of the cost typically associated with traditional enterprise service virtualization suites.

SmartBear

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Zurich Insurance Group

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Virtualization vs. Tricentis Tosca

February 2026

Free Report: ReadyAPI Virtualization vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about ReadyAPI Virtualization vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ReadyAPI Virtualization vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.