Orchestrated Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Orchestrated Service Virtualization and ReadyAPI Virtualization based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Service Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"You can push transactions through to live, and you can intercept some transactions and return them back with mocked data."

More Orchestrated Service Virtualization Pros →

"Discovery option to create virtual services.""The solution is very easy to use.""In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish.""Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint.""Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice.""ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility.""The technical support is good."

More ReadyAPI Virtualization Pros →

"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings.""Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users.""It needs support for a wider set of protocols.""The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman.""ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present.""The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"

More ReadyAPI Virtualization Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of the solution comes as part of our Tosca bundle."
  • More Orchestrated Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
  • "Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
  • "Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
  • "This product is worth the cost."
  • More ReadyAPI Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman. The overall picture the solution provides could use additional enhancements.
    Top Answer:The solution handles APIs differently than Postman, so get familiar with it before you use it. I recommend the solution and rate it a seven out of ten.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    ServiceV Pro
    Learn More
    Tosca Testsuite’s Orchestrated Service Virtualization (OSV) allows enterprises to simulate the behavior of any service needed in your application. It also allows enterprises to create business scenarios that are able to simulate complex business processes even before the completion of your application. OSV offers the independence necessary to avoid costly delays and enables earlier testing within the product cycle.

    API virtualization in ServiceV Pro helps you deliver great APIs on time and under budget, and does so for a fraction of the cost typically associated with traditional enterprise service virtualization suites.

    Sample Customers
    MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Allianz, Siemens, Bosch, Commerz Real, Toyota
    Zurich Insurance Group
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Insurance Company16%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise84%
    Buyer's Guide
    Service Virtualization
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Orchestrated Service Virtualization is ranked 6th in Service Virtualization while ReadyAPI Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Service Virtualization with 7 reviews. Orchestrated Service Virtualization is rated 7.0, while ReadyAPI Virtualization is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Orchestrated Service Virtualization writes "Live connectivity benefits but is lacking customization options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Virtualization writes "Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming". Orchestrated Service Virtualization is most compared with , whereas ReadyAPI Virtualization is most compared with OpenText Service Virtualization.

    See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.