We performed a comparison between Bright and Rapid7 AppSpider based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
Earn 20 points
A Developer-Centric Enterprise Dynamic Application Security Testing Platform.
DevOps moves quickly, and security isn’t keeping up. Developers are frustrated with security, AppSec professionals are exhausted, and security bottlenecks keep getting worse. As a result, vulnerabilities are pushed into production, increasing your organization’s risk of cyber attacks.
SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.
Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.
Bright is ranked 39th in Application Security Testing (AST) while Rapid7 AppSpider is ranked 25th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 5 reviews. Bright is rated 0.0, while Rapid7 AppSpider is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 AppSpider writes "Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable". Bright is most compared with , whereas Rapid7 AppSpider is most compared with Rapid7 InsightAppSec, OWASP Zap, Acunetix, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Invicti.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.