Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BotFarm vs Rocketbot Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

BotFarm
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
20th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rocketbot Studio
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
51st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Ganesh-Subramanian - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 9, 2024
Offers enhancement in data accuracy with low-code requirements and easy onboarding
It's a scalable product. In our organization, we sometimes write a script once and reuse it several times, which improves workflow efficiency. Our team inputs the datasets one by one or in a batch mode into BotFarm and schedules them or calls individually as needed. For instance, if one individual has 15 or 20 forms that need to be scanned and logged immediately, it's possible to implement with BotFarm and its scheduling operations. The solution is ideal for small and medium-sized enterprises and can fit in for large enterprises as well, depending upon the use case. For instance, if 100 agents are working across different locations through a mobile app, all the data from the agents can be stored in a common repository and scheduled. BotFarm can be configured based on the architecture and business operations.
Use Rocketbot Studio?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution prices are expensive. It would be more beneficial for customers to lower the pricing."
"It is too expensive and not worth the price."
"There is a license for this solution and it is on an annual basis. I am satisfied with the price."
"The licensing is on a monthly basis."
"The license of this solution is on an annual basis. The price is fair. However, what we did initially was a POC, but now we are looking at moving from a POC to expanding it out further. I would appreciate some kind of discount."
"We pay approximately $15,000 USD per year."
"The starter price is free."
"The pricing is fair."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
Insurance Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BotFarm?
The product has increased efficiency and reduced the time spent on tasks.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BotFarm?
The product is slightly expensive. In comparison to competitor tools like UiPath, BotFarm's cost is greater. Our organization also works with UiPath and Microsoft products. Our company doesn't want...
What needs improvement with BotFarm?
The solution can improve the accuracy of hand-written data reading. In some situations, the data needs to be hand-written by the agents, and at our organization, we face some rare challenges with s...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cisco, CocaCola Bottlers Japan, Macy's, Whirlpool, Unilever
1. Atlassian 2. Baidu 3. Cisco 4. CocaCola 5. Dell 6. Equinox 7. Google 8. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 9. IBM 10. Intel 11. JPMorgan Chase 12. LinkedIn 13. Microsoft 14. Netflix 15. Oracle 16. PayPal 17. Salesforce 18. SAP 19. Siemens 20. Spotify 21. Tesla 22. Uber 23. Visa 24. Walt Disney 25. WeWork 26. World Bank 27. Xerox 28. Zynga
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: September 2024.
812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.