We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product is a good standard security tool."
"The most valuable feature is the IDS."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a lot of telemetry that allows me to really see what's going on with the device."
"I find Bitdefender to be very light. When we were using the other versions, users would complain that they would make the computers slow. But since we have deployed Bitdefender, we haven't had that."
"It is very easy to configure and deploy."
"The features I found most valuable in Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security include anti-malware, spyware detection, firewall, network detection, and user behavior analytics. The solution also gives you a heads-up about operating system misconfiguration."
"The domain integrator functionality is particularly noteworthy, allowing me to leverage my existing network infrastructure."
"The solution is very scalable."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"The big advantage is that it has a sandbox if something bad comes into it."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"It's stable and reliable."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Detections could be improved."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The firewall capabilities could benefit from an upgrade since it lacks a high level of granularity and control."
"The initial setup should be made easier."
"My main concern is that it's a bit heavy for some devices. Like Kaspersky or McAfee, it uses more RAM or memory. Similar to that, it causes issues for users and their own resources, similar to that. If you deploy on old legacy devices with only 1GB of RAM, then it could be a problem."
"The solution must be more user-friendly."
"Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security could improve the RDP, I have problems sometimes."
"I like the Application Control feature, but it's a bit tricky. Managing it can be a bit cumbersome sometimes."
"There is room for improvement in CPU utilization."
"The security features as per customers' requirements should be improved."
"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."
"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."
"The menu could be cleaned up."
"There could be MDRM features added to the product."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."
"They need to enhance the performance of the agents. Currently, the performance is going low when the agent starts a full scan. The agent is consuming a lot of resources while scanning. When there are a lot of documents to check, it slows down the endpoint. This is the only thing that worries me about Comodo, but this issue is also there in other products. It is missing DLP, and I know that they are working on adding some data loss prevention capabilities. They have added some capabilities, but these capabilities are not yet mature. I hope they will enhance these capabilities because it is important to prevent the data from going out from inside. We are protected from the outside, but we also have to be protected from the inside out."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is ranked 28th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 23 reviews while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 33rd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 14 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is rated 8.2, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security writes "Gives a good snapshot of what's going on". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes "Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection". Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security is most compared with HP Wolf Security, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Seqrite Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Apex One, whereas Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.