Bareos vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Bareos and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bareos is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. Bareos holds a 2.2% mindshare in CB, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Bareos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Bareos

Read 2 Bareos reviews

1,713 Views
1,713 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 341 HPE Zerto Software reviews

13,360 Views
6,146 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Bareos

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2025

HPE Zerto Software and Bareos are competitors in data protection and recovery. HPE Zerto Software holds an advantage in disaster recovery environments.

Features: HPE Zerto Software is known for its continuous data protection, disaster recovery, and cloud data management. Bareos offers open-source flexibility, platform support, and backup, archiving, and recovery options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software provides streamlined deployment with extensive support. Bareos requires hands-on configuration but benefits from a supportive community.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software involves higher initial costs, justified by its features and disaster recovery value. Bareos offers a low-cost setup, attractive for those who prefer flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Bareos vs. HPE Zerto Software Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bareos vs. HPE Zerto Software

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bareos

Ranking in Cloud Backup

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Backup

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

341

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bareos is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 4.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

GiovanniRamirez

Senior IT Consultant at Xerif

High-performance backup with fast recovery and robust encryption features

I use Gluster as a backup. In fact, my company has a product called xBackup, which is completely based on Gluster. It includes various tools and technologies for high-performance backup, including solid-state technologies and mechanical disks, among others. Additionally, I use various other…

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of installation it provides its users."

"Bareos offers encryption on the fly, compression on the fly, and a robust and stable configuration."

"We use the solution to move servers and VMs between data centers."

"Our RTO is quick, and we can recover five to ten terabytes of data within minutes of a failover."

"What I appreciate the most about HPE Zerto Software is that it works."

"Zerto has helped us reduce overall DR testing in our company. What used to take a month I can do in less than two days."

"We use to use VMware replication appliances to attempt to replicate our VMs to remote locations and servers, but Zerto's one-to-many replication options with deduplication have made the process much simpler without having to constantly worry about the versions of each driver."

"We don't have to spend a whole lot of time worrying about DR and whether or not we are covered. Zerto just works. As it is replicating, we don't need to spend a whole lot of time with it. That is a huge benefit as far as daily management."

"There are several valuable features because of the way we use it. The backup and restore features are definitely indispensable."

"HPE Zerto Software's continuous data protection or CDP is critical for our organization because it allows us to recover within seconds to minutes, and the journal allows us to pick a point-in-time recovery."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"The virtual machine backup is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."

"Improvement is needed in the graphical web administration tool."

"We would like some of the real fine or granular things. We've submitted a few minor things for enhancements such as being able to control bandwidth utilization for each facility you replicate to versus overall. We just need a little bit more granularity on some of the things, but there is not a whole bunch that is in need of tweaking."

"It is crucial for Zerto to collaborate closely with VMware in order to promptly test updates."

"We would like the LTR function to be able to retain the past 12 months."

"Zerto can improve the dashboard by making it even more simple. Right now, there's a lot on the dashboard, and it can be overwhelming. If you're an experienced user, then you'll find it easy to use, but if you're a beginner, it will take you some time."

"Another thing that would help would be a recommender, or some type of tool that says, 'Hey, you're not conforming to best practices.' It would do a conformance or compliance check to tell you if your VPGs are set up according to best practices and whether your Zerto clusters are set up optimally. It would see if you have HA enabled and whether your alerting is turned on."

"If I had to pick anything, it would be the documentation for upgrades. They need to make it easier for users to do upgrades without having to contact support, by providing better documentation for that."

"It took some time to get to know the solution in general, and exactly what functions each of the features is used for."

"There are still some pieces in testing that aren't automated. There are still some built-in scripts or workflows I wish Zerto would do out-of-the-box, versus having to PowerShell or have a vendor create it, or create it myself."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use the open-source version of Bareos, which means I used the free version of the solution."

"We believe the pricing, setup costs, and licensing are easy to understand. The pricing seems very reasonable."

"The cost is not dirt cheap but also is not terrible."

"This solution is far less expensive than SRM and NetBackup."

"It initially seemed a little pricey, but in the big picture, you're paying for peace of mind. It could always be cheaper and more competitive, which would make it an easier choice for people, but I can see both ways. They can say this cost is for the value they are providing. If anything happens, they can recover your data very quickly. You won't be losing it, so there is a win. It is a win-win."

"It was pretty appropriate. It was not too cheap, not too expensive. It was just about right."

"The licensing model is good. The price is a little bit expensive, but for what customers get on it, it tends to pay for itself. However, if more and more companies start to improve, then Zerto may need to look at their pricing and make it a little better."

"The price is reasonable."

"It is expensive."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

12%

Non Profit

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bareos?

The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease of installation it provides its users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bareos?

The open-source version of Bareos, along with their commercial support plans, offer very fair pricing and good value.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bareos?

Improvement is needed in the graphical web administration tool. Although everything can be done via the command line, an improved graphical interface would be more comfortable. I've seen improvemen...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, I think on the pricing side, I don't generally deal with it, but from what I hear from my finance team, it's somewhat on the higher...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bacula Enterprise vs Bareos

Compared 71% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bareos

Compared 21% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Bareos

Compared 6% of the time

Synology C2 Backup vs Bareos

Compared 2% of the time

More Bareos Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 8% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2025

Download Bareos product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

August 2025

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Bareos is an open-source backup solution designed for businesses seeking reliable data protection. It provides a robust set of features to handle backup, recovery, and archiving, catering to enterprises with high data volume needs.

Bareos offers extensive capabilities, focusing on ensuring data integrity and availability. Its open-source nature allows flexibility and adaptability for IT environments, supporting different operating systems and storage types. Typically utilized by organizations requiring scalable and efficient backup systems, Bareos is valued for its comprehensive feature set, although certain areas could benefit from more streamlined deployment processes or enhanced integrations.

What are Bareos's Key Features?

Multiplexing: Allows simultaneous backup of multiple clients to enhance performance.
Data Verification: Ensures backup data integrity, minimizing potential data loss risks.
Volume Management: Efficiently manages storage volumes for optimal space utilization.
Scheduling Flexibility: Customizable backup schedules tailored to organizational needs.
Cross-Platform Support: Compatible with Windows, Linux, macOS, ensuring broad applicability.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Cost Efficiency: Open-source, reducing overall data protection expenses.
Scalability: Handles significant data loads, suitable for growing enterprises.
Community Support: Access to a dedicated user community for issue resolution.
Customization: Tailorable to fit specific organizational data backup workflows.

Bareos is effectively implemented across industries like healthcare, finance, and retail, where safeguarding substantial volumes of sensitive data is critical. It enables these sectors to meet compliance standards, ensuring secure and reliable data protection without excessive costs. Bareos's adaptability to various IT infrastructures makes it a choice for specialized industry requirements.

Bareos

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Buyer's Guide

Bareos vs. HPE Zerto Software

July 2025

Free Report: Bareos vs. HPE Zerto Software

Find out what your peers are saying about Bareos vs. HPE Zerto Software and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bareos vs. HPE Zerto Software report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.