Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Balbix BreachControl vs CyberProof comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 17, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
16th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
1st
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Balbix BreachControl
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
56th
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
18th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (14th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (22nd)
CyberProof
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
101st
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
17th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (52nd), Penetration Testing Services (30th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (57th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Balbix BreachControl is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberProof is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Zafran Security1.0%
Balbix BreachControl0.2%
CyberProof0.1%
Other98.7%
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini - PeerSpot reviewer
Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions
I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.
Use Balbix BreachControl?
Share your opinion
Use CyberProof?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
868,288 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?
Since we stood Zafran Security up in our private cloud, we handle the maintenance on our side. As we opted not to use...
What needs improvement with Zafran Security?
In terms of areas for improvement, Zafran Security is doing a really great job as a new and emerging company. Oftenti...
What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?
My use cases for Zafran Security revolve around two primary areas. One is around vulnerability management and priorit...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
BreachControl
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cavium
UST Global
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Wiz and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: September 2025.
868,288 professionals have used our research since 2012.