Bacula Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Bacula Systems and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bacula Systems is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0, while NetApp is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.3. Bacula Systems holds a 1.7% mindshare in CB, compared to NetApp’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

3,340 Views
1,971 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

5,256 Views
999 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are competing solutions in the data management space. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and integration, which may be seen as more valuable features despite Bacula's cost advantages.

Features: Bacula Enterprise offers comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities, compatibility with various operating systems, and the benefits of open-source flexibility. It provides extensive data protection, making it ideal for enterprises with diverse IT environments. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP delivers cloud-native features, seamless integration with cloud services, and strong data mobility, particularly supporting multi-cloud strategies. Its robust cloud adaptation is a key selling point, tailored for modern infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Bacula Enterprise may require improvements in ease of initial setup, enhanced user interface, and expanded support for hybrid environments. Additionally, more streamlined customization options could enhance user experience. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could improve by optimizing pricing transparency, expanding regional availability, and refining automation features to simplify deployment processes further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise offers a straightforward deployment process, although the initial setup might pose challenges. Its support system is solid but often necessitates customization efforts. In contrast, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides a streamlined, cloud-focused deployment coupled with comprehensive support, benefiting organizations with immediate cloud integration and ensuring operational continuity.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise is known for its attractive pricing, offering a high return on investment for budget-sensitive enterprises. Its cost-effective structure is appealing for companies aiming to manage expenses. On the other hand, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, despite a higher initial investment, yields compelling ROI through enhanced cloud functionalities and efficiency gains, appealing to enterprises prioritizing long-term operational savings over upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,286 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Cloud Backup

16th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (24th)

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Backup

30th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (2nd), Cloud Storage (3rd), Public Cloud Storage Services (13th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.7%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bacula Enterprise	1.7%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	0.8%
Other	97.5%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

Punit Waghela

Technical Specialist at Softcell Technologies Limited

Offers advanced features with notable emphasis on innovation

The best features of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP include deduplication, compaction, and autonomous ransomware technology that native cloud storage solutions in AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud do not support. Moreover, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP allows the use of multiple protocols including NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI, whereas native options may only support NFS and iSCSI. Customers already using on-premises NetApp storage such as FAS, AFF, or ASA can experience the same functionality on the cloud with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which adds significant value. For data protection, customers can take advantage of the Snapshot technology available with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. This technology facilitates data recovery by allowing snapshots to be stored either on the same storage or on a disaster recovery (DR) storage. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP helps us to take snapshots and store them on the same storage, with options for migration or replication of those snapshots to different storage, including on-premises DR storage or other cloud storage, providing excellent disaster recovery capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"The most valuable feature is its ease of use; it works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Linux servers."

"It is easy to scale Bacula Enterprise even if your system is growing tremendously in data and servers."

"Bacula Enterprise, so far, has never let us down with their service and support."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

More Bacula Enterprise pros

"One of the features of this tool is the ease of use, in addition to the control access and the dynamics with which it is structured."

"NetApp CVO allows us to continue to provide service customers with access to their data, even if a physical site is going to be down for a long period of time."

"It makes sure we have control of the data and that we know what it's being used for. The main thing for us is that we need to know what applications are consuming it and responsible for it. The solution helps us do that."

"The feature which I like the most is that it has the capabilities that the traditional storage system offers. It provides all the functionality. The deduplication and compression work exactly like ONTAP's traditional storage. So people who have experience with that find it very easy to manage."

"This solution has made everything easier to do."

"The good thing about NetApp is the features that are available on the cloud are also available on-premises."

"We are definitely in the process of reducing our footprint on our secondary data center and all those snapshots technically reduce tape backup. That's from the protection perspective, but as far as files, it's much easier to use and manage and it's faster, too."

"If your organization is looking for cost savings, NetApp is the way to go."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Relying solely on a desktop is a bit frustrating as its GUI isn't exactly responsive."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Bacula needs a graphical user interface because, for administrators, the command-line interface is okay, but for the average user it is not very easy."

"We would like to see an improvement in the functionality of the GUI."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

More Bacula Enterprise cons

"I would like NetApp to come up with an easier setup for the solution."

"We've just been dealing with general pre-requisite infrastructure configuration challenges. Once those are out of the way, it is easy."

"The data tiering needs improvement. E.g., moving hard data to faster disks."

"We have used technical support. As long as they don't call me at four o'clock in the morning to tell me that a drive failed and they are sending me another one, I like it."

"We have customers that are still using IBM mainframes and that very old SNA architecture from IBM. There are questions about how you interconnect the data on the mainframe side... But I don't know if it's worth it for NetApp to invest in developing products to include mainframes for a few customers."

"I would like to see something from NetApp about backups."

"Me gustaría verlos mejorar la perspectiva de inicio y búsqueda en los paneles. Esto permitiría una mejor visualización de los contenidos que se capturan en la herramienta."

"From what I've seen with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, the delivered performance doesn't match the performance that I select; it's about half."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."

"Overall, the pricing of NetApp is aggressive and the pricing becomes more aggressive as the amount of data increases. The cost for a given volume of data that you are storing becomes lower. The greater the volume of data, the cheaper the license."

"Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration."

"The cost is quite high."

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

"They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy."

"For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 19% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 9% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 6% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Everpure Evergreen One vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

March 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

March 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Bacula Enterprise is a highly scalable, especially robust and secure data backup and recovery software. Its unique low cost subscription model empowers data centers to truly escape data volume price traps. With a high degree of flexibility and customizability, Bacula offers native integration with a wide range of hypervisors, databases, file systems, cloud interfaces and containers. High numbers of enterprise organizations worldwide (incl. NASA, Bank of Austria, Swisscom or Sky PLC) have adopted Bacula Enterprise backup software in mission critical environments because of its advanced features and ability to handle high data volume at very low cost.

Bacula Systems

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

March 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,286 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.