Bacula Enterprise vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Bacula Systems and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Bacula Systems is ranked #18 with an average rating of 10.0, while NetApp is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.3. Bacula Systems holds a 1.4% mindshare in CB, compared to NetApp’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Bacula Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Bacula Enterprise

Read 10 Bacula Enterprise reviews

4,198 Views
2,393 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

7,290 Views
1,604 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Bacula Enterprise

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Bacula Enterprise and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are competing solutions in the data management space. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP seems to have the upper hand due to its superior scalability and integration, which may be seen as more valuable features despite Bacula's cost advantages.

Features: Bacula Enterprise offers comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities, compatibility with various operating systems, and the benefits of open-source flexibility. It provides extensive data protection, making it ideal for enterprises with diverse IT environments. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP delivers cloud-native features, seamless integration with cloud services, and strong data mobility, particularly supporting multi-cloud strategies. Its robust cloud adaptation is a key selling point, tailored for modern infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Bacula Enterprise may require improvements in ease of initial setup, enhanced user interface, and expanded support for hybrid environments. Additionally, more streamlined customization options could enhance user experience. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could improve by optimizing pricing transparency, expanding regional availability, and refining automation features to simplify deployment processes further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bacula Enterprise offers a straightforward deployment process, although the initial setup might pose challenges. Its support system is solid but often necessitates customization efforts. In contrast, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides a streamlined, cloud-focused deployment coupled with comprehensive support, benefiting organizations with immediate cloud integration and ensuring operational continuity.

Pricing and ROI: Bacula Enterprise is known for its attractive pricing, offering a high return on investment for budget-sensitive enterprises. Its cost-effective structure is appealing for companies aiming to manage expenses. On the other hand, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, despite a higher initial investment, yields compelling ROI through enhanced cloud functionalities and efficiency gains, appealing to enterprises prioritizing long-term operational savings over upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bacula Enterprise

Ranking in Cloud Backup

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (22nd)

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Backup

31st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (2nd), Cloud Storage (5th), Public Cloud Storage Services (12th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Bacula Enterprise is 1.4%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bacula Enterprise	1.4%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	1.0%
Other	97.6%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Davilson Aguiar

Analista Tecnologia Banco de Dados at Centro de Gestão da Tecnologia da Informação

Very cost-effective and well organized with good compression

It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company. A managerial user who wants more information beyond the operational technician should be able to access it. It could include greater transparency regarding the volume of data trafficked on the network, as well as the expectation of deduplication. A more practical strategy could come with a backup policy model as a suggestion for both large and small companies. A simple suggestion is to visually implement the backup time as far as your physical media.

Read full review

Punit Waghela

Technical Specialist at Softcell Technologies Limited

Offers advanced features with notable emphasis on innovation

The best features of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP include deduplication, compaction, and autonomous ransomware technology that native cloud storage solutions in AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud do not support. Moreover, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP allows the use of multiple protocols including NFS, CIFS, and iSCSI, whereas native options may only support NFS and iSCSI. Customers already using on-premises NetApp storage such as FAS, AFF, or ASA can experience the same functionality on the cloud with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which adds significant value. For data protection, customers can take advantage of the Snapshot technology available with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. This technology facilitates data recovery by allowing snapshots to be stored either on the same storage or on a disaster recovery (DR) storage. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP helps us to take snapshots and store them on the same storage, with options for migration or replication of those snapshots to different storage, including on-premises DR storage or other cloud storage, providing excellent disaster recovery capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"The support is outstanding and world-class."

"The most valuable feature is the support for Linux servers."

"Technical support is excellent in my opinion."

"It brought many advantages - such as the learning curve being very light."

"The most valuable feature is its ease of use; it works great and it provides you with several standard tools to restore your backup, even after a big failure."

"Bacula is very solid, very stable, and very scalable."

"It can be used in virtually any environment we have onsite."

More Bacula Enterprise pros

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc."

"The most valuable features of this solution are SnapShot, FlexClone, and deduplication."

"They have very good support team who is very helpful. They will help you with every aspect of getting the deployment done."

"CVO gives us the ability to access data as quickly as possible, which is critical because of the mission set we handle. Some things cannot wait. For example, we tried having the data in the cloud itself, but it took too long for us to retrieve it from cold or deep storage. If we have it ONTAP or on-prem, it's so much easier to pull it within minutes."

"First and foremost, test the use cases where you need availability and performance as the key drivers for a solution; in those scenarios, NetApp is way ahead compared to what the competitors offer."

"The inline encryption using SnapMirror has helped us to address concerns over data security in the cloud."

"NetApp's Cloud Manager automation capabilities are very good because it's REST-API-driven, so we can completely automate everything. It has a good overview if you want to just have a look into your environment as well."

"The most valuable feature is its exceptional performance and storage efficiency."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"We are looking for a unique interface that can rule both enterprise and open source editions. Such a thing does not yet exist."

"Relying solely on a desktop is a bit frustrating as its GUI isn't exactly responsive."

"The initial setup could be a bit easier."

"Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability."

"It could improve its interface or offer a specific screen for the manager of the company."

"The interface needs to be easier for adding new devices to be managed."

More Bacula Enterprise cons

"Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult to deal with from the client-side and I'd love to see a single entry point that can be moved around within the cluster to simplify the client configuration."

"The automated deployment was a bit complex using the public APIs. When we had to deploy Cloud Volumes ONTAP on a regular basis using automation, it could be a bit of a challenge."

"The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible."

"We would like to have support for high availability in multi-regions."

"One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have."

"Not a perfect ten because it's not very efficient with upgrades and management."

"We have used technical support. As long as they don't call me at four o'clock in the morning to tell me that a drive failed and they are sending me another one, I like it."

"How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have a perpetual license."

"This is an open-source solution."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."

"For enterprise customers, it's a very cost effective. But in the SMB segment, yeah, pricing is a little bit challenge for your time."

"Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost."

"The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately."

"It is not a cheap solution because we need to pay for the license and pay for Azure resources as well."

"It is expensive. There are no costs in addition to their standard licensing fees."

"The pricing of this solution is definitely higher than what the typical Azure Files and AWS solutions charge, but given the features and the stability NetApp has provided, we are okay with it. We are not complaining about the pricing."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bacula Enterprise?

Bacula is more expensive than various other solutions. It’s almost completely commercial now. Products like Veeam software are much more expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bacula Enterprise?

Many features have been converted to commercial licensing, which restricts their availability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bacula Enterprise?

The last scenario in which I used Bacula was for a customer who needed some open-source tool which could support encryption at that time. We managed to convince the customer to use Bacula to deploy...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bareos vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 12% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

UrBackup vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

QNAP Backup Solution vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Bacula Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Bacula Enterprise Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 8% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

Everpure Evergreen One vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

May 2026

Download Bacula Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

April 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Bacula Enterprise offers robust backup solutions with extensive plugins for services like SAP HANA and Microsoft SQL, supporting multi-platform environments. It's valued for scalability, transparent licensing, and effective data recovery.

Bacula Enterprise serves organizations with diverse IT landscapes by providing scalable backup solutions tailored for platforms like Linux servers. Its extensive documentation and community support ensure smooth operation and reliability. Users appreciate features including deduplication, compression, and centralized management, contributing to efficient data protection for industries such as banking and healthcare. The setup process can be complex for some, and there is demand for a more intuitive interface, improved mobile support, and better GUI functionality. Despite initial setup challenges, Bacula Enterprise remains a trusted tool for data management with flexible resource utilization and security features.

What are the key features of Bacula Enterprise?

Extensive Plugins: Supports SAP HANA, Microsoft SQL, enhancing integration.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across different IT environments.
Scalability: Adapts to growing organizational needs efficiently.
Transparent Licensing: Offers cost-effective solutions with clear pricing.
Data Deduplication: Optimizes storage by eliminating redundant data.
Centralized Management: Streamlines data handling processes across systems.

What benefits should users seek in reviews of Bacula Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies complex backup procedures for technical teams.
Resource Optimization: Maximizes efficiency in data storage and retrieval.
Reliable Data Recovery: Ensures data can be restored effectively when needed.
Versatile Configuration: Supports easy customization for specific needs.

In sectors like banking, healthcare, and government, Bacula Enterprise handles large data volumes and secures backup tasks with encryption. Its multi-platform support is crucial for heterogeneous systems, executing scheduled tasks and data protection protocols efficiently, while fulfilling industry-specific compliance and reliability requirements.

Bacula Systems

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

NASA, SwissCom, Navisite, Turner Studios, Bank Austria, Caixa Bank, SdV Plurimedia, Leibniz University Hannover, Zeta Global, Tricore, NetLog, Siemens, LocaWeb, wbsGo, itesys, Queens School of Computing, Escrypt.

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

April 2026

Free Report: Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bacula Enterprise vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.