Azure Web Application Firewall vs Indusface AppTrana comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
5,679 views|4,675 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Indusface Logo
348 views|280 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Web Application Firewall and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Azure WAF is extremely stable.""We have found the most valuable features to be the web application, minimal skills required for management, control through policies, and automation.""It's quite a stable product and works well with Microsoft products.""The integration it has with GitHub is great.""The most valuable feature is that it allows us to publish our applications behind the firewall.""The initial setup is easy and straightforward...Azure Web Application Firewall is a scalable product.""It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn. It's cloud-based, so you don't need to buy or maintain any hardware infrastructure.""It has been a stable product in my experience."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Pros →

"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."

More Indusface AppTrana Pros →

Cons
"The management can be improved.""The documentation needs to be improved.""The support for proxy forwarding could improve.""Azure WAF should not be deployed in the middle of the traffic.""There is a need to be able to configure the solution more.""I would say that Azure's customer service is not that good...I am not very happy with the support offered.""In Brazil, we have some problems with the phone service that affect our connection with the cloud. However, it isn't common.""From a reporting perspective, they could do more there."

More Azure Web Application Firewall Cons →

"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."

More Indusface AppTrana Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have an enterprise agreement with Microsoft and the pricing is good."
  • "The price is for this solution is fair and there is a license needed."
  • "The price of the solution depends on your architecture and how you manage it. You can control the cost in Azure quite well. The costs do not directly correlate to expenses in the features we are using."
  • "Azure WAF has price advantages over other WAF solutions. The pricing model is flexible because you pay on a scale based on the level of protection you need."
  • "I give the pricing a nine out of ten."
  • More Azure Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Indusface AppTrana is an affordable and cost-effective solution."
  • More Indusface AppTrana Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration it has with GitHub is great.
    Top Answer:The pricing is quite high. It's not cheap. The free version doesn't have the capability a user would need.
    Top Answer:The documentation needs to be improved. It's not ideal. There are multiple deployment options. However, there is a lack of clarity around them. There's no real community to reach out to and no videos… more »
    Top Answer: One of the best practices is to educate employees on how to avoid becoming a bot, so to speak. Attackers often use compromised devices controlled remotely to launch DDoS attacks. It's essential to… more »
    Top Answer:The self-managed rules feature offers a lot of flexibility in defining the trigger conditions for activating rules within users' applications. Users can specify the circumstances under which the… more »
    Top Answer: Two of the advanced techniques that a WAF employs are geo-fencing and geo-blocking to further enhance security. Geo-fencing allows users to create a virtual perimeter around a specific geographical… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,679
    Comparisons
    4,675
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    474
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    348
    Comparisons
    280
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    205
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AppTrana
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Web Application Firewall (WAF) provides centralized protection of your web applications from common exploits and vulnerabilities. Web applications are increasingly targeted by malicious attacks that exploit commonly known vulnerabilities. SQL injection and cross-site scripting are among the most common attacks.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    AppTrana is designed to address the shortcomings in existing cloud security solutions which claim to provide comprehensive protection using only technology based cookie cutter solutions. Welcome to the new world of AppTrana where your entire application security is custom built by experts based on your existing risk posture.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Shoppers Stop, TCS
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Pharma/Biotech Company14%
    Government14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Large Enterprise91%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Web Application Firewall is ranked 12th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 9 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Azure Web Application Firewall is rated 8.4, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Azure Web Application Firewall writes "It's a good option if you want a solution that's ready to go and easy for your team to learn". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". Azure Web Application Firewall is most compared with AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb, Azure Firewall and Azure Front Door, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, AWS WAF, Akamai App and API Protector and Radware DefensePro.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.