We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Rubrik is an easy and automatic solution that needs no manual intervention."
"The web-based approach is the most valuable feature."
"Disk mount that lets a restore happen immediately, no need to re-hydrate."
"Management is so simple that anyone can check the backups and do restores when necessary."
"It works with VMware and Hyper-V without agent installation."
"Rubrik has made the process to manage backup and recovery painless. This frees up more time to work on other projects."
"This is a centralized tool where we are able to schedule backups and perform monitoring."
"The solution is extremely stable. They've been phenomenal, especially for a young company."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"I would like to see more security features."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"I don't like Rubrik's user interface because it's not intuitive, and I find it hard to get the information I need."
"I hope to see enhancements in areas like data governance and the incorporation of new features in future updates."
"The main pain points we experienced was the stability of the system. We received a lot of instability when we have upgraded from a certain version to a new version. The newer version was completely filled with bugs and we needed to purge the system every week until we update to a newer version that was available one year later. The stability of the code is the main problem, they need to make it better."
"Rubrik could improve in customization options for dashboards."
"Two areas I would like to see improvement in Rubrik are pricing and localization."
"Could be improved from an analytics point of view."
"The product’s user interface needs improvement."
"I would like for unmanaged backups to be able to be saved in a separate policy."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 82 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and IBM Disaster Recovery Services, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.