

Opsview and Azure Monitor are competing products in IT monitoring and management. Opsview's adaptability and customer-focused features give it an edge in terms of user-friendliness, while Azure Monitor's integration within the Azure ecosystem offers significant advantages for cloud-focused businesses.
Features: Opsview offers flexible monitoring capabilities, customizable dashboards, and worker redundancy. Azure Monitor provides comprehensive analytics, deep integration with Azure services, and powerful data analytics capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Opsview could enhance its integration capabilities and add more third-party plugins. It also lacks some advanced analytics features present in competitors. Azure Monitor might improve ease of use for beginners, streamline setup processes, and offer more transparency in pricing structure.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview provides straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, which aids in ease of use. Azure Monitor, while tightly integrated with Azure, can be challenging for users unfamiliar with Azure environments but benefits from robust support for those accustomed to its platforms.
Pricing and ROI: Opsview's adaptable pricing appeals to businesses seeking scalable solutions with clear costs, often resulting in favorable ROI. Azure Monitor's costs can be higher due to its extensive features, but integrated functionalities may justify expenses with streamlined ROI for organizations within the Azure platform.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
However, the second-line support is good.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
With APM, you can go heavy or you can go light. It just depends on what you want, what your use case is, and how reactive you want to be to system load or resilient to failure.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
Grafana does have features that I think my current solution lacks, such as better performance reporting.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.
I also appreciate the ability to measure feature activity, see what types of devices they are on, follow specific use cases, and measure the amount of traffic going to a particular application.
Resource monitoring is essential.
Opsview's alerting capabilities are very helpful, and they positively impact our incident response times.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Monitor | 2.6% |
| Opsview | 2.0% |
| Other | 95.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Azure Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring across applications and cloud resources, integrating seamlessly with Azure services to enhance performance tracking and telemetry analysis.
Azure Monitor extends monitoring capabilities for applications, infrastructure, and security, featuring easy integration with Azure and third-party tools. It supports dynamic alerting and telemetry, offering log analytics and metrics gathering. Users benefit from its alert system and intuitive dashboards, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud and infrastructure monitoring across diverse IT environments. While users seek improved query building and interface navigation, they appreciate its scalability and cost-effectiveness.
What key features does Azure Monitor offer?Azure Monitor sees widespread use for infrastructure and application monitoring across industries. Companies rely on it for performance tracking and incident management, often integrating it with Application Insights for enriched data analysis. Organizations use it to monitor servers and cloud services, utilizing its capabilities in DevOps practices and during cloud transformation processes for analyzing database metrics and ensuring efficient application functioning.
Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.
Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.
What are Opsview's most important features?Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.