Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure AI Foundry vs Microsoft Power Apps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.1
Azure AI Foundry streamlines implementation, boosts efficiency, and delivers ROI, though financial impacts vary, especially for non-profits.
Sentiment score
7.1
Microsoft Power Apps boosts productivity and savings by automating processes, though ROI and licensing can vary for complex cases.
Each one we've carefully measured ROI and been able to demonstrate significant ROI with them.
AI Practice Director at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
The biggest return on investment for me when using Azure AI Foundry is the savings in cost for implementing our own observability, visibility, evaluation, and building our own infrastructure to do proof of concepts.
Assistant VP, Architecture (Engineering & Director at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The playground is where you can deploy the model and test, and guardrails serve as the protection mechanism.
Advisory Specialist Master at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The connection between Power Apps and Power BI simplifies generating and presenting reports, alleviating the workload and enhancing productivity.
Revit Developer at Expocentric pty Ltd
The aim is to create a cleaner interface to replace spreadsheets, thus standardizing processes and improving efficiency.
Management Analyst at a government with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.3
Azure AI Foundry support receives mixed reviews, citing both quick responses for some and delays and challenges for others.
Sentiment score
6.3
Microsoft Power Apps customer service is mixed, with some delays; users rely on community support and documentation for help.
I evaluate customer service and technical support positively because we have the enterprise license, which allows us to prioritize serious issues, ensuring that Microsoft support responds quickly.
Manager, Data Science at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate customer service and technical support as a nine.
Senior VP, AI, Innovation & Architecture at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
I am receiving full support due to our partnership with Microsoft and because we are in the evaluation phase.
Sr Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
They are probably adequate for pretty vanilla type of requirements or support tickets, but when it actually comes to something in-depth, I would not rate them more than six or seven, maximum seven.
Automation Enthusiast at Sateba Group
Their assistance was crucial as we developed the solutions.
Management Analyst at a government with 10,001+ employees
Community support is closer to an eight or nine since there's a big enough community that someone has likely faced the same problem and posted about it, improving the community overall.
Technology & Innovation Consultant at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Azure AI Foundry offers seamless scalability, though GPU availability and organizational readiness can affect expansion and deployment.
Sentiment score
6.6
Microsoft Power Apps is flexible and adaptable but may face scalability issues with large data and enterprise use.
Azure AI Foundry scales with the growing needs of my organization very well.
Senior VP, AI, Innovation & Architecture at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
The platform expands to all of our needs without us really having to do anything, so scalability is definitely there.
Staff Software Developer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I've had a couple of times where I've had to get to the VP level of Microsoft before I could get the capacity I needed for my customers.
AI Practice Director at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
If it is flexible and includes premium connectors, scalability is easy.
Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
It is quite scalable, though there are some limitations regarding the number of records.
RPA Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Azure AI Foundry is stable with high user satisfaction, despite occasional issues due to broader Azure service outages.
Sentiment score
7.5
Microsoft Power Apps is stable and reliable with occasional issues; generally well-rated, especially for simpler use cases.
I have not experienced any downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
Directeur Des Ventes at Ited
Regarding stability and reliability, I've had zero downtime with Azure AI Foundry, and it helps fix itself.
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would assess the stability and reliability of Azure AI Foundry as very good.
Senior VP, AI, Innovation & Architecture at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
I have not really seen any performance issues, slowness, or response time.
Automation Enthusiast at Sateba Group
I would rate the stability of Microsoft Power Apps as a nine out of ten.
Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Room For Improvement

Azure AI Foundry needs improved integration, usability, transparency, governance, and tool support to enhance user experience and adoption.
Microsoft Power Apps needs improvements in integration, documentation, pricing, customization, connectivity, and user experience for seamless functionality.
Providing data on the internal workings of Azure AI Foundry would help customers like us feel more comfortable adopting it.
Assistant VP, Architecture (Engineering & Director at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
What did not work well for us regarding Azure AI Foundry includes the security piece, being able to identify how to deploy to multiple regions, reducing latency, and managing tokens per minute.
Azure Cloud Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
With code, you know what the binary result is, but with prompting, it is a lot harder.
Senior Director, Data Orchestration Ai & Helix Practice Advisor at Connection
This would assist business process users who lack coding knowledge.
Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
These tools should be intuitive for business users who will need at least a week of training to use them effectively.
Management Analyst at a government with 10,001+ employees
In many use cases, applications might require importing data exceeding two thousand records, potentially reaching one hundred thousand.
RPA Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Azure AI Foundry pricing varies by user, with mixed views on cost justification and competitiveness, prompting some to seek alternatives.
Microsoft Power Apps offers competitive pricing with varying costs based on subscription, often cheaper than custom development.
Regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Azure AI Foundry, I would say it is fair, but I think it gets more expensive.
Assistant VP, Architecture (Engineering & Director at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
the pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Azure AI Foundry are very expensive, but still cheaper than hiring an additional position
Manager, Data Science at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
It was difficult to get an understanding of how we could model out our pricing and cost over time without talking to someone.
Senior VP, AI, Innovation & Architecture at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
For small to medium enterprises, it is affordable, especially with Microsoft Enterprise licensing.
Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
For more elaborate work, an upgrade to an enterprise license, costing around $35 per license, is needed.
Management Analyst at a government with 10,001+ employees
It is in the middle range and considered reasonable given the current price.
RPA Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Azure AI Foundry streamlines AI integration with quick testing, centralized hosting, enhanced security, and efficient deployment features.
Microsoft Power Apps facilitates rapid app development with seamless integration, customizability, low-code access, and cost-effective automation options.
Some examples of how its features have benefited my organization include ease of access, being able to see what's functioning, what's not functioning, why it's not functioning, and when it stopped functioning, and to maintain visibility on day-to-day operations.
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The feature of being able to pick the right models has been the most beneficial for enhancing our customer service because some AI models are more expensive but slower, while others are faster and cheaper, allowing us to pick the right model for the right task that we are trying to solve.
Manager, Data Science at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
The feature that has been the most beneficial for enhancing customer experience is the one that allows you to compare multiple models to one another and see how they perform against each other.
AI Practice Director at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
It integrates seamlessly with Power Automate for process automation and connects with email, SharePoint, Power BI, and MS Teams, facilitating everyday processes.
Revit Developer at Expocentric pty Ltd
Canvas Apps provide complete user design flexibility with many connectors to integrate into Microsoft Power Apps, making it efficient to fetch and update information from various data sources such as Dataverse, Excel, SharePoint, and Azure.
RPA Developer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
I run a couple of SQL Servers, which are premium connectors in Microsoft Power Apps, and that requires a different licensing model than what a standard E5 license covers.
Technology & Innovation Consultant at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure AI Foundry
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AI Development Platforms (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th), AI-Agent Builders (3rd)
Microsoft Power Apps
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
96
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Sudhakar Pyndi - PeerSpot reviewer
Data, Analytics & Ai Senior Director, Enterprise Architecture at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Document processing has accelerated contract reviews and enabled rapid development of AI-driven supply chain solutions
With regard to security, compliance, or governance features in Azure AI Foundry, this is something that we have started looking into, primarily using Microsoft Purview for our governance, data governance. There is this new module called DSPM for AI, and we are exploring it while trying to operationalize it with different policies and so forth, but we're still not where we want to be on the governance, AI governance side. It's a process and a path, and we are trying to work through that right now. Azure AI Foundry can be improved from the governance perspective, as a lot can be done. The promising part is the recent announcement on the Foundry control plane. A couple of days back, there was an announcement regarding it bringing in some of the gaps that were on the platform, so it's a really positive direction in terms of where it's going. More governance is what is lacking, but the control plane will really play a big role there.
BS
Automation Enthusiast at Sateba Group
Low-code AI workflows have streamlined content curation and currently support rapid app creation
Microsoft Power Apps could be improved because there are still a lot of jargons and too many moving parts. For example, if you look at Copilot, the term Copilot is confusing in the sense of whether it is Copilot in M365, Copilot Studio, or Copilot in Microsoft Power Apps. There is a plan designer which uses Copilot. The whole thing how AI has been positioned is still not lucid for the end user. An end user wants to know exactly what they want and where they go to get it. I think that could also be because things are evolving so fast. From an end-user perspective, the way it has been positioned, the clarity and the boundaries between the different types of offerings and AI offerings available is confusing as of now. There should be better clarity on that. The biggest issue I have, and I have also spoken to a few of my clients about this, is the licensing model. In traditional software development, almost 95 percent of the time, the development team bears the cost of the licenses. For example, if I develop something, I may have to pay licenses for four or five different software that I use. As a user, if you use my services, you probably pay something to me as a subscription, but you do not have to bother about the licenses. All that is wrapped under the hood. Unfortunately, in Power Platform as such, and even in other low-code things like UiPath, if you use a premium feature such as Dataverse, almost everything ends up using Dataverse or SQL Server or some relational database. If you use that, then as an app builder or app maker you have to have a premium license. The end user too would need to have a premium license. That really makes the adoption prohibitive. It is too expensive. We are talking about something like around just for Microsoft Power Apps alone, approximately twenty dollars per month, which is extremely high. Another point to consider for what else can be improved in Microsoft Power Apps is that one does not know what compute power one is getting when one buys a license. If you look at the licensing model, you will get to know how much of Dataverse storage you will get in terms of log storage, database storage, and file storage. However, you do not get to know how much of compute power is being given to you. I do not think Microsoft has an SLA saying that any request of a certain amount, such as MB per second, you will get a response time of whatever, one by sixtieth of a second or some millisecond. I do not think that they have that performance SLA in place. They do have storage SLA which comes with the license, but they do not have a corresponding SLA for performance.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business31
Midsize Enterprise17
Large Enterprise50
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure AI Foundry?
I would need to ask my technical team about my experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing.
What needs improvement with Azure AI Foundry?
The platform's effect on my management of privacy, performance, and compliance across different regions is quite complex because Azure AI Foundry does not make it very clear how to deploy. We set u...
What is your primary use case for Azure AI Foundry?
My main use cases for Azure AI Foundry include deploying AI applications to perform document comparison, translation services, and a chat feature, helping the digital AI team at our company. Curren...
How would you choose between Microsoft PowerApps and Salesforce Platform?
I think it depends on your use case. If your organization uses Microsoft Enterprise products, PowerApps will work better in your environment. Similarly, if you have a Salesforce integration in pla...
Would you choose ServiceNow over Microsoft PowerApps?
Hi Netanya, I will choose ServiceNow because ServiceNow is a very good tool compared to Microsoft PowerApp. Because ServiceNow has a very strong module (Performance Analysis) reporting which will ...
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
 

Also Known As

No data available
PowerApps, MS PowerApps
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
TransAlta, Rackspace, Telstra
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure AI Foundry vs. Microsoft Power Apps and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.