Axonius vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) comparison

Axonius and Diligent are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Axonius is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5, while Diligent is ranked #21. Axonius holds a 2.0% mindshare in IVRM, compared to Diligent’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Diligent users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 9 Axonius reviews

4,866 Views
535 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Diligent One Platform (form...

Read 3 Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) reviews

1,788 Views
608 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axonius

Diligent One Platform (form...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Diligent One Platform and Axonius are competitive solutions in the governance, risk, compliance, and cybersecurity asset management sectors. Axonius typically has an advantage due to its comprehensive asset inventory and security integrations, though Diligent One Platform offers effective pricing and robust support.

Features: Diligent One Platform provides integrated GRC capabilities, risk management tools, and compliance automation, focusing on holistic compliance solutions. Axonius features a detailed asset inventory, identifies security gaps, and integrates with IT and security systems, emphasizing cybersecurity enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Diligent One Platform allows seamless deployment with guidance and accessible customer support, ideal for compliance efficiency. Axonius, although complex in deployment due to integration requirements, benefits from proactive customer service for security management challenges.

Pricing and ROI: Diligent One Platform is competitively priced, offering strong ROI through comprehensive compliance oversight. Axonius may incur higher initial costs but offers substantial long-term value by improving asset visibility and security, showcasing a trade-off between immediate affordability and strategic security investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Axonius vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (1st)

Diligent One Platform (form...

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (23rd), IT Governance (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Axonius is 2.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) is 2.6%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Axonius	2.0%
Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)	2.6%
Other	95.4%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

Sakkemgari Tamagari

Director of cloud security at Nuxeo

Centralized asset tracking has transformed governance and now speeds incident response

I would add that currently, the tool supports some integrations, but we would expect it to support broader integration with other security tools, observability, or any other cloud integrations. One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved. The user interface needs improvement because it is a bit laggy sometimes, making it not straightforward when we want to identify things quickly, leading us to go in different directions which could be better tied together in one place.

Read full review

WillWillis

Data Analyst at Rhythex

Good automation and analytics, but is costly

The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing reports that meet the expectations of our clients and customers. It would be beneficial if the focus could be shifted toward improving the reporting aspect. The impact report is a crucial aspect, as we only have one opportunity to create it. Galvanize HighBond can improve by generating more impact reports post-project, and allowing access to the reports using a web version, which would greatly benefit us. The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"In comparing Axonius to other products, I believe its main competitors on the market offer similar functionalities, but my experience with other solutions has shown me that Axonius stands out."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"The automation capabilities in Axonius have streamlined our security operations."

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"The most valuable feature is automation."

"We have far more visibility into our compliance, risks and controls over the areas we are managing versus accepting risk, and Rsam has also been extremely helpful with the annual audits we receive from our regulators."

"In one year we were able to accomplish what we could not in our 3 year Archer contract, and we did it with half the consulting services and one-third the administrators."

Cons

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Regarding the improvement of Axonius, it goes halfway for both the tool and the user. If we set it up quickly from our end, and if the AD groups and all other groups assigned to tag the assets have been tagged correctly, Axonius could not show an error."

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"One area Axonius can be improved is its integration process, as it is not straightforward; there is a lot involved in cloning the instance and other hard changes that I expect to be fully automated, suggesting an agentless method instead of utilizing agents, which feels somewhat legacy but could be improved."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"While they don't need as much consulting to get the product implemented, I do wish they had more available."

"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

I am generally satisfied with Axonius's reporting features. The reporting part could be simplified for the end user, and it might be beneficial to have tutorials or drafts from the vendor. I want t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My use case for Axonius is extensive as I utilize it in multiple processes, and I would describe the use case for Axonius as great.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 17% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Axonius

Compared 8% of the time

Armis Centrix™ for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

runZero vs Axonius

Compared 6% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

ACL Analytics vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 11% of the time

RSA Archer vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 10% of the time

NAVEX Global vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 10% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 7% of the time

BIC GRC vs Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Compared 7% of the time

More Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

May 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

April 2026

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) report

Download Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize , Diligent GRC Platform

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) offers a comprehensive solution for risk management, audit, and compliance needs, enabling businesses to streamline processes and enhance operational efficiency.

Leveraging advanced technology, Diligent One Platform integrates multiple functionalities to provide extensive support in governance, risk management, and compliance across enterprises. It consolidates data and automates workflows, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives rather than repetitive tasks. Designed for scalability, it accommodates the needs of large organizations while maintaining flexibility.

What are the key features of Diligent One Platform?

Integrated Workflows: Automates and coordinates tasks for improved efficiency.
Real-time Analytics: Provides data-driven insights and supports decision-making.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers tailored views for monitoring and reporting progress.
Regulatory Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and documentation sharing.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Diligent One Platform?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes to reduce time and resource expenditure.
Cost Savings: Minimizes manual tasks leading to reduced operational costs.
Risk Mitigation: Predicts and addresses potential risks proactively.
Strategic Focus: Frees up resources for strategic growth and innovation.
Enhanced Compliance: Maintains compliance effortlessly, avoiding regulatory fines.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Diligent One Platform is applied to monitor compliance and optimize risk management efforts. By integrating seamlessly with existing systems, it supports sector-specific regulations and requirements, delivering impactful results in diverse environments.

Diligent

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

CNA Insurance

Buyer's Guide

Axonius vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

April 2026

Free Report: Axonius vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond)

Find out what your peers are saying about Axonius vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axonius vs. Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.