We performed a comparison between AWS Firewall Manager and Tufin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management."AWS Firewall Manager isn't a separate solution when you create the virtual private cloud (VPC), so you can control the traffic through that security group."
"Policy management and the cartography of the network have been the most valuable features."
"Being able to customize your own clarity to that aspect of change management."
"It is an important application for controlling and monitoring firewall rules. It is useful for making and monitoring the changes."
"Visibility is its largest and most valuable feature. You can see everything or all the devices on the network for each customer. It provides you a larger view of what might be wrong with the network and how you can improve it with firewall rules, etc. If you are talking about secure change, being able to automate the entire change process is pretty much the winner for us. It is going to really reduce the time that it takes for us to do changes, and we can just go out and get more customers."
"The technical support is pretty good."
"All the basic functions work well."
"The solution is good, and no clients complained about it."
"The solution is quite scalable."
"I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty."
"Its price is reasonable, but it could be lower. It could have a more effective approach for creating and changing rules. It could provide advice or suggestions for a better understanding of rules and changing the rules. There should be suggestions for the rules that need to be changed to make them less risky."
"The initial setup can be tough."
"Their pricing can be better. It is not very transparent."
"The pricing could be a bit more competitive."
"The initial setup of Tufin was complex. We had some issues with the architecture."
"The solution does not have automation with other Firewalls."
"The older version that we have doesn't support some newer firewall vendors."
"Lacks ability to create a Terraform that would enable deployment without manual steps."
AWS Firewall Manager is ranked 7th in Firewall Security Management with 1 review while Tufin is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 20 reviews. AWS Firewall Manager is rated 7.0, while Tufin is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Firewall Manager writes "It's built into the virtual private network so you can control all the traffic, but it lacks UTM features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin writes "Suits customer needs in complex environments but licensing model for routing devices could be simplified". AWS Firewall Manager is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Panorama, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Azure Firewall Manager, Skybox Security Suite and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer, whereas Tufin is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon, Skybox Security Suite and Palo Alto Networks Panorama.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
