AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Nutanix are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 25 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

6,916 Views
3,804 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Read 6 Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] are both valuable disaster recovery solutions. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery may have the upper hand given its superior technology integration with AWS services, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive cloud services.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers automated orchestration, continuous data protection, and a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] is favored for its ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, and reliable backups, making it ideal for small businesses seeking a scalable solution.

Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users highlight the need for better automation and logging features, as well as a reduction in high costs. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] could improve in security resilience and multi-cloud capabilities, with users requesting more comprehensive educational resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for robust support in public cloud environments and proactive customer service. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers solid support in hybrid cloud and on-premises settings but requires a more formal ticketing system for efficient issue tracking.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is noted for its significant ROI despite its high costs, attributed to its comprehensive disaster recovery capabilities. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers favorable pricing for enterprises, costing less than AWS but less appealing for smaller businesses. Both solutions prove valuable by minimizing downtime and enhancing data security during disasters.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,654 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (8th), Cloud Backup (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills

Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.

Read full review

Ingvar Ingason

Channel Sales Manager at Arrow Electronics

An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support

I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase. The product's installation phase took me around two weeks. On average, it usually takes about a week or two to deploy when everything is in place. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud from Azure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."

"I appreciate the automated orchestration of recovery processes in this solution, especially integration with Route 53 and automatically using Route 53 to switch to a different region directly."

"Some of the most valuable features of this product include its ability to manage disaster recovery effectively."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"The initial setup is really straightforward."

"Since deploying AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, we have mostly seen an improvement in uptime, which contributes to reducing downtime."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a robust and reliable solution for disaster recovery needs."

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."

"We find the ease of use valuable."

"We use this solution as an integrated backup solution and it is integrated from the backup provider to the Nutanix solution."

"Nutanix, in my opinion, will eventually take over."

"Nutanix can converge legacy-style rack mount servers, so it is highly scalable."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is useful for those who run an infrastructure where there might arise a need to do some transition or want to opt for digital transformation."

"Our primary use case for the solution is to back up our devices and equipment for employees and some equipment in airport software."

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] pros

Cons

"The cost of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as expensive."

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

"I would say it did not provide enough flexibility for all our backup needs."

"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives. Right now, it is difficult and painful to do."

"Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time."

"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."

"There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"It could be cheaper."

"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."

"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution could be cheaper and they should include more education or marketing materials for users to understand how to use the solution."

"The pricing could be improved. It's an expensive solution."

"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."

"The solution's setup process should be simplified."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two."

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten because the price is average."

"While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

13%

Educational Organization

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

This was for the school.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

NetApp SnapCenter vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Arcserve UDP vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Quorum OnQ vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

September 2026

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

September 2026

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Nutanix Mine

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is a turnkey solution that makes backup infrastructure simple and invisible by combining the Nutanix Cloud Platform technology with leading enterprise backup software for dedicated data backup and recovery.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.