AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Nutanix are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 25 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

8,071 Views
4,600 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Read 6 Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] are both valuable disaster recovery solutions. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery may have the upper hand given its superior technology integration with AWS services, appealing to businesses needing comprehensive cloud services.

Features: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers automated orchestration, continuous data protection, and a pay-as-you-go pricing model. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] is favored for its ease of deployment, cost-effectiveness, and reliable backups, making it ideal for small businesses seeking a scalable solution.

Room for Improvement: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users highlight the need for better automation and logging features, as well as a reduction in high costs. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] could improve in security resilience and multi-cloud capabilities, with users requesting more comprehensive educational resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is praised for robust support in public cloud environments and proactive customer service. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers solid support in hybrid cloud and on-premises settings but requires a more formal ticketing system for efficient issue tracking.

Pricing and ROI: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is noted for its significant ROI despite its high costs, attributed to its comprehensive disaster recovery capabilities. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] offers favorable pricing for enterprises, costing less than AWS but less appealing for smaller businesses. Both solutions prove valuable by minimizing downtime and enhancing data security during disasters.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (8th), Cloud Backup (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (7th)

Nutanix Mine Integrated Bac...

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills

Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.

Read full review

Ingvar Ingason

Channel Sales Manager at Arrow Electronics

An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support

I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase. The product's installation phase took me around two weeks. On average, it usually takes about a week or two to deploy when everything is in place. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud from Azure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests."

"It's on the cheaper side and not too expensive for users."

"The ability to replicate our database and our data from one cloud to another is the most valuable feature."

"Scalability is pretty good; it's seamless and can do it automatically."

"There has definitely been a lot of improvements in recovery time with very less downtime because we already understand how to recover using the clear process that AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides."

"The solution is dependent on the network bandwidth. For example, if they have a bandwidth of 10Mbps the solution will run a little heavier. If the bandwidth is good the solution runs well."

"Since deploying AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, we have mostly seen an improvement in uptime, which contributes to reducing downtime."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery has positively impacted my organization by securing and stabilizing our platform."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"Our primary use case for the solution is to back up our devices and equipment for employees and some equipment in airport software."

"We use this solution as an integrated backup solution and it is integrated from the backup provider to the Nutanix solution."

"Nutanix, in my opinion, will eventually take over."

"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."

"I like the autofill-over feature and the simplicity of the solution."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is useful for those who run an infrastructure where there might arise a need to do some transition or want to opt for digital transformation."

"We find the ease of use valuable."

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] pros

Cons

"Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information."

"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line."

"I have not seen any areas that need improvement at this time."

"While the service is very effective, it could improve in areas such as more granular cost visibility during staging and test launches."

"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."

"The UI could be a little sleeker."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The pricing could be improved. It's an expensive solution."

"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."

"It could be cheaper."

"The solution could be cheaper and they should include more education or marketing materials for users to understand how to use the solution."

"The solution's setup process should be simplified."

"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."

"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two."

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten because the price is average."

"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced."

"While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

11%

Educational Organization

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

This was for the school.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

NetApp SnapCenter vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Arcserve UDP vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

November 2026

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] report

Download Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup [EOL] product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Nutanix Mine

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is a turnkey solution that makes backup infrastructure simple and invisible by combining the Nutanix Cloud Platform technology with leading enterprise backup software for dedicated data backup and recovery.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.