![AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] vs. Tray.io report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-c33db68f.svg){kind=icon}
![AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/ecwtjjlwilx2g4qujp0d5nz7cwsn.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/ecwtjjlwilx2g4qujp0d5nz7cwsn.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_40/ecwtjjlwilx2g4qujp0d5nz7cwsn.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
In the tool, parallel processing is an area that is contingent, in the sense that you have to be watchful for the cap that you have in terms of computing behind AWS Data Pipeline. You need to always watch for some reason. I am capped with 200 nodes, and if I get to use more than 200 nodes, the AWS Data Pipeline will fail. AWS doesn't state that I have almost gone beyond my limits, and it is allowing me now to go beyond the set limits if I talk to a representative and figure it out. Such aforementioned warnings are not let out by AWS, and they end up failing the nodes if I go beyond the set cap limits.
![Perspectium DataSync vs AWS Data Pipeline [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/86jbs99e4yu1oo80e12dej3kjph3.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
