No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Budgets vs CoreStack comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Budgets
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
37th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CoreStack
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
24th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of AWS Budgets is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreStack is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CoreStack1.3%
AWS Budgets0.5%
Other98.2%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Chukwudi Uzoma - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of IT, Infrastructure at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
FinOps budgets have strengthened cost governance and provide timely alerts for spending spikes
There is limited visualization compared to Cost Explorer. Budget actions are useful but not as flexible as custom automations. Reporting can become difficult in large, multi-account organizations or environments. FinOps teams usually go to Crol, AWS Athena, or QuickSight for deeper analysis. Alerting fatigue can occur if thresholds are not carefully designed. I rated this product eight out of ten because, similar to every service, there is room for improvement. If AWS Budgets could improve reporting for larger multi-account environments, enhance budget actions, and provide limited visualization improvements, the rating could be a ten. For now, the rating remains eight.
Manmohan Rao - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited
Cost reports have driven accurate AWS workload optimization and continue to guide savings
I can suggest improvements for CoreStack, especially regarding reporting periods. I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%. I have concerns about needed improvements primarily regarding AWS. If a customer is running ten virtual machines and one machine has a maximum of 1% utilization, it is considered as an idle instance in the report, which completely ignores that particular machine. This should not be the approach.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"AWS Budgets is an overall valuable service for organizations beginning their FinOps journey and for maintaining cost accountability across teams."
"Currently, I think CoreStack is the best FinOps tool available in the market, which is why we are using it."
"My advice for others looking into using CoreStack is that anyone who is looking to optimize their workload cost for public cloud services should start using CoreStack because of the reports and granularity it produces to optimize cost, which will benefit them."
"CoreStack has positively impacted my organization by saving hours of time for reporting—for example, the governance report which my employees used to take at least four hours for one customer, and since I'm sending out 20 reports every month, that equates to 80 hours, thus saving me two man-weeks every month and approximately $8,000 in pure savings if I estimate $100 an hour for my architect."
"CoreStack helped me to manage the Cloud Security Posture Management across different clouds, including AWS, Azure, and other cloud providers, allowing me to view all the policies and misconfigurations in one centralized console rather than going to multiple consoles to look for violations and take actions, which was really helpful for me."
 

Cons

"There is limited visualization compared to Cost Explorer. Reporting can become difficult in large, multi-account organizations or environments."
"I believe the multi-tenancy feature is present, but if it could be improved and secured further, that could be beneficial."
"I give it an eight because, as I mentioned, a few things from the billing operations need to be added, and we need more security features, particularly since the market is increasingly demanding better security tools for cloud management platforms, including cloud security posture assessments."
"I am not currently using CoreStack, as I moved away from CoreStack due to a lot of issues with accuracy."
"I noticed that some of the cost optimization reports generated potential savings while considering systems that have only maximum utilization of 1% or 2%. The recommendations made in CoreStack to delete a machine have the potential to generate major cost savings, but such machines should not be listed for deletion if they have maximum CPU utilization of 1%."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Media Company
18%
Construction Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Budgets?
Pricing for AWS Budgets is very low, mostly free with minimal charges. It is also high value compared to the cost.
What needs improvement with AWS Budgets?
There is limited visualization compared to Cost Explorer. Budget actions are useful but not as flexible as custom automations. Reporting can become difficult in large, multi-account organizations o...
What is your primary use case for AWS Budgets?
AWS Budgets is used for the internal FinOps experience, creating monthly cost budgets for AWS accounts and business units for tracking actual spend versus forecasted spend. The service sets thresho...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreStack?
I had no concerns about pricing, setup cost, and licensing since the cost was nominal and good.
What needs improvement with CoreStack?
The basic functionality of the CSPM and the compliance were present, but there were no feature additions for those modules for the past two to three years, which was not great. From a usability per...
What is your primary use case for CoreStack?
My main use case for CoreStack was CSPM and compliance CoreStack helped me to manage the Cloud Security Posture Management across different clouds, including AWS, Azure, and other cloud providers. ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
CAMS
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: August 2026.
913,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.