We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Azure Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can scale."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"The product provides self-healing features."
"Azure Monitor's best features are its graphs and charts, the different visibility options, and reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."
"The most valuable features of Azure Monitor are the login analytics workspace and we can write any kind of custom queries in order to receive the data that is inserted into the login analytics workspace, diagnostic settings, et cetera."
"I am monitoring all of my Azure Monitor and getting good reports. I can customize the reports to get the information I need. I am also getting emails about which AAS instances are down and everything in the system related to my services. It is easy to use, scalable, and user-friendly. Microsoft has Many guides and videos to help you understand how to create and use Azure Monitor."
"It's a Microsoft native tool, so it works well with other Microsoft technologies, which is predominantly what our customer end-user base is."
"The solution has tons of valuable features."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."
"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"It could be cheaper."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The tool must include AI features."
"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."
"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."
"The scalability could be improved as there are some limitations."
"As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced."
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Azure Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Sentry, Prometheus and Grafana. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Azure Monitor report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
