

Azure Monitor and AWS Auto Scaling compete in cloud management. Azure Monitor seems to have the upper hand in monitoring and analytics, while AWS Auto Scaling excels in scalability and robustness.
Features: Azure Monitor has detailed metrics, log analytics, and application performance monitoring. AWS Auto Scaling integrates seamlessly with AWS services, offers efficient scaling features, and ensures high reliability.
Room for Improvement: Azure Monitor could improve alert configuration, integration with non-Microsoft products, and simplify custom solution setups. AWS Auto Scaling might benefit from enhancing complex scaling policies, better documentation, and more accessible advanced support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Monitor has a straightforward deployment process, but custom configurations can be complex. Its customer support receives positive feedback. AWS Auto Scaling is easily set up within the AWS environment, though fine-tuning can be challenging. Customer service is responsive but specific issues may require advanced support.
Pricing and ROI: Azure Monitor's pricing is considered fair but can become expensive with extensive use, offering a positive ROI due to its features. AWS Auto Scaling provides cost-effective scaling, aligning costs with resource consumption, resulting in significant ROI through optimized resource utilization.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
AWS support is very good.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
However, the second-line support is good.
It was not as straightforward as the normal telemetry endpoints, meaning that you had to be on the VPN and do all of that.
Scalability is impressive, as it allowed us to go from 1,000 to 10,000 active users within a week during a traffic spike.
With APM, you can go heavy or you can go light. It just depends on what you want, what your use case is, and how reactive you want to be to system load or resilient to failure.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
This complexity led me to migrate to CloudFormation, which simplifies the deployment process.
If you could add more training on how to use it correctly and on the functions that I haven't used before or some people have not really used before, that would help.
It requires a downtime before deploying the Auto Scaling group.
My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
The pricing of Auto Scaling is medium range, neither high nor low.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
During peak traffic times, the Auto Scaling group can be deployed to ensure that the client works well, and the traffic remains average.
The automation aspect where you can automate it to whatever you want is what I value the most about Auto Scaling.
Its automatic scaling capabilities are very useful.
Azure Monitor full stack visibility in managing applications' health helps with APM, infrastructure monitoring, multi-cloud monitoring, security and compliance monitoring, and DevOps and automation monitoring.
I also appreciate the ability to measure feature activity, see what types of devices they are on, follow specific use cases, and measure the amount of traffic going to a particular application.
The ease of access in Azure is significant because it's native to the platform and easy to integrate.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Azure Monitor | 2.4% |
| AWS Auto Scaling | 0.5% |
| Other | 97.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
AWS Auto Scaling optimizes resource use by automatically adjusting instances based on demand. It integrates with CloudWatch for seamless monitoring, enhancing system reliability and cost efficiency without manual intervention.
AWS Auto Scaling is designed to dynamically scale resources in response to demand, supporting horizontal and vertical scaling for optimal performance. It integrates well with AWS services like EC2 and ECS, allowing for flexible and scalable solutions. Predictive scaling and intelligent automation reduce costs and ensure reliability, particularly during unpredictable traffic variations. Users implement it to maintain efficiency and minimize downtime, benefiting from features such as self-healing and health checks.
What are the key features of AWS Auto Scaling?In industries with variable demand, AWS Auto Scaling is deployed to manage real-time traffic surges, ensuring efficient use of resources during periods such as events and festive seasons. Users grow dynamic environments while balancing costs and maintaining stability, integrating the tool with CI/CD processes for continuous and efficient deployment.
Azure Monitor delivers comprehensive monitoring across applications and cloud resources, integrating seamlessly with Azure services to enhance performance tracking and telemetry analysis.
Azure Monitor extends monitoring capabilities for applications, infrastructure, and security, featuring easy integration with Azure and third-party tools. It supports dynamic alerting and telemetry, offering log analytics and metrics gathering. Users benefit from its alert system and intuitive dashboards, making it a preferred choice for multi-cloud and infrastructure monitoring across diverse IT environments. While users seek improved query building and interface navigation, they appreciate its scalability and cost-effectiveness.
What key features does Azure Monitor offer?Azure Monitor sees widespread use for infrastructure and application monitoring across industries. Companies rely on it for performance tracking and incident management, often integrating it with Application Insights for enriched data analysis. Organizations use it to monitor servers and cloud services, utilizing its capabilities in DevOps practices and during cloud transformation processes for analyzing database metrics and ensuring efficient application functioning.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.