• Home
  • Avo Assure vs. OpenText UFT One

Avo Assure vs OpenText UFT One comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Avo Automation Logo

Avo Assure

352 views|225 comparisons
OpenText Logo

OpenText UFT One

Read 89 OpenText UFT One reviews
11,332 views|6,941 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Test Automation Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avo Assure and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Avo Assure?
Don Ingerson
With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then...
If your concerns go beyond automating tests to providing evidence that specific tests were executed, what the test pass/fail status was, the user... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."
  • "The licensing and pricing model is confusing."
  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."
  • "The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
  • "The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
  • "The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."
  • "The price is one aspect that could be improved."

    • More OpenText UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
    Top Answer:We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?
    Top Answer:My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
    Read all 35 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?
    Top Answer:The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on… more »
    Read all 34 answers   →
    Ranking
    32nd
    out of 47 in Test Automation Tools
    Views
    352
    Comparisons
    225
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 47 in Test Automation Tools
    Views
    11,332
    Comparisons
    6,941
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    694
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
    Learn More
    Avo Automation
    OpenText
    Overview

    Avo Assure is an intelligent test automation solution that enables organizations to deliver high-quality applications and achieve continuous testing without writing a single line of code.

    Avo Assure is built to make application testing a delightful and straightforward experience where organizations can enhance their automation coverage by up to 90%. Due to its no-code capabilities, all of the testing efforts are reduced to a click of a button, leaving employees with ample time to focus on the non-repetitive and more rewarding tasks.

    Being cross-platform compatible, Avo Assure lets enterprises build and execute test cases for web, windows, mobile platforms (Android and IOS), non-UI (web services, batch jobs), ERPs, Mainframe systems, and associated emulators through a single solution. All these, without the hassles of downloading and installing plugins individually for each platform.

    Avo Assure offers a visual representation of the entire testing component hierarchy with its unique Mindmaps feature and helps define test plans and design test flows with excellent transparency.

    Avo Assure seamlessly integrates with SDLC and continuous integration systems like Jira, ALM, TFS, Jenkins, and QTest.

    The test Accelerator pack specifically designed for SAP comes with 100's of pre-built test cases specific to SAP that reduces testing time by over 75%. Migrations to ECC and S4/HANA are also made easy with at least 50% effort saving.

    Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper
    Sample Customers
    CNA Financial, M&T Bank, Voya Financial, Emerson Electric, First Horizon Bank and VFISLK
    Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Legal Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Insurance Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Automation Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avo Assure is ranked 32nd in Test Automation Tools while OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews. Avo Assure is rated 0.0, while OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". Avo Assure is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ and LEAPWORK, whereas OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite.

    See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, best Regression Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.