We performed a comparison between Avalor and Nucleus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
Our data fabric architecture integrates disparate data sources from legacy systems, data lakes, data warehouses, sql databases, and apps, providing a holistic view of business performance.
Automation, 2-way sync, alerts, and analytics live on top of the platform, powered by the data fabric.
All security functions benefit from fast, reliable, and precise analysis of enterprise data including asset coverage, compliance reporting, ROSI analysis, vulnerability management, and more.
Nucleus is a Risk Based Vulnerability Management (RBVM) solution that automates vulnerability management processes and workflows, enabling organizations to mitigate vulnerabilities 10 times faster, using a fraction of the resources that it takes to perform these tasks today.
Avalor is ranked 16th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management while Nucleus is ranked 13th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Avalor is rated 0.0, while Nucleus is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Avalor is most compared with Brinqa, Vulcan Cyber and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), whereas Nucleus is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Vulcan Cyber, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.