Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs CA Unified Communications Monitor comparison

Auvik and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while Broadcom is ranked #89. Auvik holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 208 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

16,097 Views
11,107 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

1,805 Views
1,227 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

CA Unified Communications M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Auvik Network Management are competing network management solutions. Auvik Network Management seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive features and easier deployment.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor focuses on monitoring voice and video communications, providing detailed network traffic analysis and call quality monitoring. Auvik Network Management offers automated network discovery, comprehensive network topology mapping, and strong alert management.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could enhance its deployment simplicity, expand its feature set for broader network management, and improve automation capabilities. Auvik could work on reducing initial setup costs, enhancing voice and video monitoring features, and simplifying intricate network installations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Auvik Network Management provides a cloud-based deployment model simplifying setup, coupled with extensive support. CA Unified Communications Monitor, while requiring more intricate installation, offers strong customer service to support its users.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor is known for lower initial setup costs and rapid ROI for communication monitoring. Auvik Network Management, though possibly higher in setup costs, delivers better long-term ROI through its extensive features and automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. CA Unified Communications Monitor Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. CA Unified Communications Monitor

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

2nd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

89th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

60th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.3%
CA Unified Communications Monitor	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Wahaj Memon

System Engineer Tier 4

Real-time alerting enhances network monitoring, but interface and network mapping need improvement

The interface is good yet could be improved. There are many elements that could be changed in the interface itself. There should be some sort of chart or alerting within the dashboard. In the overview section, these features are currently absent. When you get an alert, you must go to notifications, then within the device to identify the issue. It would be beneficial if everything was visible immediately upon logging in to the overview, such as machine performance and other metrics. Regarding the network map and visibility, there are some issues. Many people have mentioned that the network map needs improvement, especially when handling numerous items. Currently, I have everything in place: printers, monitors, laptops, switches, and access points. However, I have three switches showing outside of the loop without explanation. This issue is persistent, not occasional. These switches appear disconnected in the corner, even though they are connected and online according to other platforms. The presentation aspect needs significant improvement. We have government-related clients, and taking a screenshot of the current network mapping to send to them appears unprofessional. Although Auvik Network Management (ANM) provides network mapping, I still need to create my own network diagram to make it presentable for clients.

Read full review

reviewer1605927

Sr.Solutions Engineer | Project Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Meets the needs of the customer but all of the features need improvement

I do not choose the solution. The client does. I am an implementer. We are systems integrators. It is worth mentioning that the solution should be easy to install and offer the user exhibition capabilities. Also, a data sheet should be used to gather information about the product, to facilitate easy and simple implementation. I rate CA Unified Communications Monitor as a five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From a product perspective, it's a 10 out of 10."

"With Auvik, we monitor the heart of every client's operations."

"People typically use Auvik to look at NetFlow data, but we went for it because we wanted a convenient cloud-based platform to collect data that we don't have to host locally. We like that having space available is not our problem. You can deploy an agent on your network through a virtual machine running on a secure Linux operating system. It's a secure product, and the data we need is available in the cloud."

"Overall, I really love the tool as it has been super helpful for us in our environment."

"And the visibility into remote and distributed networks globally was one of the reasons we moved to Auvik."

"Overall, I rate Auvik Network Management (ANM) a nine out of ten."

"The ability to have visibility on a network to see the traffic and the ability to see if devices are misconfigured and if something changes in that configuration, are most valuable."

"The most valuable feature for us in Auvik is the network topology."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"For us, it's very key to know the voice quality of the total solution, which is based on many components across many domains."

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

Cons

"Navigating around the map on more complex networks is pretty painful if you're showing endpoints."

"When we configured our network, there were some mismatches between the automatically-detected network topology and the actual topology. Some of the devices were not detected or were not supported by Auvik. We were able to manually modify things and everything has worked well since then."

"I've had some issues where the solution repeatedly discovers a device I don't want to manage and alerts me about it. This is probably me not using the tool correctly, or it could be Auvik recognizing the device in different ways."

"I'd like to see an improvement in how we target individual devices."

"Price sensitivity is an issue in the country where we use Auvik because of our exchange rate. It would be helpful if they could offer a slightly more affordable price in this region. I'd also like to see Auvik introduce more AI-driven features."

"Auvik's UI, while informative, can be a hurdle for new users due to its complexity."

"The solution doesn't reduce repetitive low-priority tasks through automation as much as we had hoped."

"They can implement a more collective network mapping to help reduce any congestive features. When it came down to many of the companies we worked with, their networks were already pre-structured, so we didn't have as much congestion. Given the fact that I could see how that would be an issue, maybe there would be a better way they could collapse or compile the network mapping issues."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved, specifically the user experience."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is good, but I haven't looked at the pricing in a while. So, I don't know if it has changed or not. As far as I know, the pricing is still where it should be. I have no issues with it."

"Their licensing model is basically per managed device. You pay X amount per managed device, and managed devices are limited to switches, routers, firewalls, and wireless LAN controllers. So, the only things that we pay for are our switches, routers, firewalls, and wireless LAN controllers, but there are orders of magnitude more devices that Auvik manages that we don't pay for. It also manages servers, workstations, and phones. Auvik will gather KPIs from anything that is connected to the network if it can be managed via a standard like SNMP or WMI. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"For small businesses with many devices, the tool is potentially unaffordable. Auvik Networks Inc. is competing with other companies offering very expensive products. Still, there's a gap in the market and potentially a lot of lost revenue for smaller customers, especially those with complex IT environments."

"Auvik is billed by network device. They bill our firewalls and networks. However, there are devices that are not subject to billing in our environment, such as PCs, phones, and printers."

"They're very competitive on the pricing front. They may not be the least expensive, but they're certainly not the most expensive. They're right in a sweet spot. For our organization, at least, it was right within the budget."

"I'm an engineer, so I'm unfamiliar with the cost of Auvik and the other options on the market. My advice to those concerned about pricing is to do their homework and compare all the offerings. They could also demo Auvik to see if it meets their needs and justifies the cost."

"Auvik is a good product and worth the premium price tag for a lot of people."

"The pricing is favorable."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	146
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) is not costly, but pricing is based on how many licenses are taken, and that can be improved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

One improvement that would be really beneficial for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the ability to get alerts sent to me via text. Right now, the only alerts I can get are via email. Receiving al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is managing our overall network and being able to have insight into all of the devices, switches, servers, firewalls, and access points on the ne...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

StackState vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

May 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

April 2026

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

CA UC Monitor

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

CA Unified Communications Monitor provides real-time insight into communication networks, ensuring seamless connectivity and performance.

Designed for efficient management of unified communications, CA Unified Communications Monitor helps organizations monitor, diagnose, and manage their network and communication services efficiently. It delivers critical network visibility, allowing IT teams to quickly identify and resolve performance issues. Built with scalability in mind, it supports environments of all sizes, adapting to evolving network demands.

What are the key features of CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides live updates and dashboards for continuous network performance oversight.
Scalability: Handles growing network demands effortlessly, supporting various organization sizes.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reporting to help in troubleshooting and performance analysis.
Custom Alerts: Configures alerts for proactive issue management, ensuring quick response to potential disruptions.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating CA Unified Communications Monitor?

Improved Network Performance: Enhances overall communication quality by addressing bottlenecks promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime and maintenance costs through proactive monitoring and quick issue resolution.
Enhanced User Satisfaction: Ensures a seamless user experience with consistent communication services.
Operational Agility: Adapts easily to growing network needs, supporting efficient management processes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education benefit significantly from CA Unified Communications Monitor implementation. It ensures stable connections for remote consultations in healthcare, supports financial data transmission, and enables interactive learning experiences in education. By facilitating uninterrupted and high-quality communications, it directly contributes to business continuity and improved operational outcomes.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

BBVA Compass

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. CA Unified Communications Monitor

April 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. CA Unified Communications Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. CA Unified Communications Monitor and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. CA Unified Communications Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.