We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and HCL Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It scales very well. We can add jobs and remove jobs. We do not have problems maintaining the product across multiple environments and multiple servers."
"The web UI is beneficial and the granular security policies allow us to cover all of our audit requirements."
"Automation of patch process."
"The CA workload agent has gotten much better. For our organization it's important for us to communicate in a secure fashion between the host and the other platforms, and we are able to do that with our CA product"
"Without this product we would have to manually submit jobs and it would take longer. There would also be a much greater possibility of jobs running wrong and/or not at the right time."
"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."
"The aggregator reporting utility which tells us our throughput in lag and latency."
"The scheduling feature allows us to know when jobs are going to run and makes sure they run in the order needed."
"Easy to set up, it doesn't require a lot."
"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."
"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"Documentation and cross-application externals could be improved."
"CA installation processes are never anything but complex."
"Performance improvements in the UI would be appreciated."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve the integration."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"The interface needs some improvements."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while HCL Workload Automation is ranked 25th in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while HCL Workload Automation is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HCL Workload Automation writes "Easy to set up, good support, and helps to decrease project costs". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas HCL Workload Automation is most compared with IBM Workload Automation, Control-M, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.