We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."This solution enables us to improve our daily processing times. We can do everything faster than before we used this solution."
"Easy configuration and integration with SAP."
"It allows you to automate tasks, and reduce headcount, prevent errors, self-heal."
"It has allowed us to automate many of the functions of our operations staff. For instance, we had production control staff spending two hours a day entering date parms into our daily business processes. And now, CA Workload Automation does it for us."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The capabilities of the product to schedule on multiple platforms, multiple operating systems."
"The customized views that each individual can create, and views that can be made free-form, makes this very popular with the programmers."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"The stability of the solution is good. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches and we haven't had any crashes that I can recall."
"The solution is easy to manipulate and has good performance."
"I would like to see the Service Orchestrator, a B2B product, and maybe a process audit."
"Some support issues need to be addressed, but not through email, through personal contact via phone or WebEx."
"The GUI/Workstation is weak and needs to be improved. CA is working on this right now."
"The solution does not have a friendly subscription model because it forces users to take a five-year subscription simultaneously, charging millions of dollars."
"Because this product only computes processing days, it is hard when things need to be scheduled according to non-processing days."
"AutoSys Workload Automation could improve in the Linux environment. The previous versions of the AutoSys Workload Automation let you take the profile of the user that you were using to run the tasks that you're going to automate, but in the latest versions, you can't do that, you need to make more definitions and it's a little bit difficult. It was easier in the previous versions."
"Needs better documentation with fully explained examples for some of the job types."
"I am looking forward to more of their dashboard features. I think it would be very valuable for us to have dashboard features that could be delivered to our customers in the form of a URL, and they could refresh that URL whenever they wanted to get up to date performance metrics out of our systems."
"We have difficulties manipulating the agent for Windows."
"The technical support could be improved by removing delays in response times. They should be able to get back to clients faster."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] writes "An easy initial setup with scalability capabilities and good stability". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Stonebranch and Automic Workload Automation, whereas CA Workload Automation iDash [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.