Automox vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Automox and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Automox is ranked #39 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.2. Automox holds a 0.6% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 13 Automox reviews

3,203 Views
1,217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Security Center

Read 56 Tenable Security Center reviews

9,188 Views
6,615 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Automox

Tenable Security Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tenable Security Center and Automox are products in the cybersecurity realm, focusing on vulnerability and patch management. Automox is favored for ease of use and cloud-based automation, while Tenable Security Center is known for comprehensive features.

Features: Tenable Security Center offers robust vulnerability management including asset discovery, dynamic tracking, and advanced reporting. Automox focuses on automated patching, efficient security configuration, and IT asset management.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve in its initial setup complexity, user interface simplicity, and transition towards cloud-native solutions. Automox may enhance its feature depth, expand integration options, and offer more detailed reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox provides quick, cloud-based deployment with minimal maintenance, supported by responsive customer service. Tenable Security Center requires detailed initial setup due to its broad feature set, but offers strong integration with existing infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Automox's predictable pricing leads to clear ROI benefits through low ownership costs and efficient resource utilization. Tenable Security Center has higher initial costs with licensing fees, but delivers strong ROI via advanced management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Tenable Security Center

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.3

Automox delivers positive ROI by automating patch management, enhancing security, reducing manual tasks, and improving operational efficiency.

Sentiment score

6.5

Tenable Security Center boosts ROI by minimizing costs, enhancing security, reducing manpower needs, and preventing costly data breaches.

It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

Our team used to spend 10 hours per week just to update these things, and now we're doing it automatically.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

If we cannot adjust how to operate the solution, then it becomes very difficult, so hearing and initial tuning are very important.

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Through the use of Tenable Security Center, my clients achieve more efficient patching and gain visibility and understanding of security operations, leading to improved resilience and infrastructure insight.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.6

Automox's customer service is praised for being effective, responsive, proactive, with quick solutions and superior support over competitors.

Sentiment score

7.4

Tenable Security Center customer support is responsive and knowledgeable, with U.S. support rated higher than the European counterpart.

They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.

Robert Araya

Network & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The customer support for Automox is very responsive and proactive.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Longer response times and less thorough assistance.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

They are helpful and were very helpful to us, coordinating with us on several issues.

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

Automox efficiently scales across varied organizations, easily adds devices, but faces challenges in multi-tenant environments and occasional load issues.

Sentiment score

8.0

Tenable Security Center is praised for its seamless scalability, adaptability, and integration, accommodating diverse organizational needs and sizes effectively.

It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

I can scale it extensively with the use of agents, allowing scanning in restrictive environments and loosely connected devices.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center.

Kevin Mwangi

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.4

Users praise Automox for its reliable performance, effective patching, stable agent, quick issue response, and consistent availability.

Sentiment score

8.0

Tenable Security Center is highly stable and reliable, handling large tasks efficiently with users rating its stability highly.

It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

The stability of the solution is outstanding.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Room For Improvement

Automox requires enhancements in profile synchronization, access control, offline patching, reporting, and Linux/iOS remote support to improve management.

Users desire improved reporting, third-party integration, interface design, vulnerability handling, web scanning, pricing, support, and user-friendly features.

An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

I would add that remote support for iOS could be better, and remote support of Linux is also lacking.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.

Kevin Mwangi

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements.

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Translating reports into European languages is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Setup Cost

Automox provides cost-effective pricing for enterprises with mixed OS environments, featuring flexible plans, discounts, and free trials.

Tenable Security Center is costly per asset, with options including subscription and perpetual licenses, generally pricier than competitors.

Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Valuable Features

Automox's cloud-based platform offers automated patching, multi-OS compatibility, and seamless endpoint control, enhancing IT operations and security.

Tenable Security Center offers comprehensive vulnerability management with intuitive tools, strong integration, and flexible compliance for effective threat detection.

One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed.

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Tenable Security Center provides an overall score of vulnerabilities, comparing an organization with others in the same industry.

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping.

Kevin Mwangi

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

39th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (35th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (14th), Patch Management (13th)

Tenable Security Center

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (11th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 2.8%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Security Center	2.8%
Automox	0.6%
Other	96.6%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automation has saved time and improves secure, centralized patching across all our devices

While Automox has very good features, I think there's still room for improvement. I want the custom reports to be even more detailed, specifically where I can add more details. It would be nice to have more filters in reports based on location and department more easily. Secondly, the notifications could be more customizable. Many times notifications come, but we don't have control over which notification is urgent and which is not. For example, if there's an alert of a critical update or pending approval, it can help me focus better. An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important. Customized notifications would be much better. I would say the user interface could be improved as well. Some parts of the dashboard are a bit hard to understand. If they could be improved to be more intuitive, for example, if it could be easy to navigate between devices and reports, that would be great. I would say if Automox could also provide automation templates, that would help. I know there are templates, but I want more templates. Having ready-made worklets for common tasks can save a lot of time. Lastly, it should also support the interface for mobile screens.

Read full review

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Centralized analytics have strengthened patch visibility and support efficient regulatory reporting

From my experience, I assess the product's analytics capabilities as successful. It helped us significantly with patching and managing the risk of the patching process across all our environments, including network devices with Windows and Unix systems. The product covered several environments and gave us exactly what we needed in our environment. Tenable Security Center's centralized platform helped with risk assessment and management across our IT environments. It covered the patching process, and we previously faced many issues regarding how to patch different environments, how to monitor the patching process, and whether it was successful or not. We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed. This gave us good details about the process which helped us significantly in our reporting and even in audits, whether internal or external. We learned how to close audit issues safely and successfully. We used the dashboards for real-time threat insights and extracted several dashboards from Tenable Security Center. We use these dashboards in our cybersecurity dashboard and committees that we have. These dashboards are part of our committees, especially the cybersecurity committee and other committees that we attend.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automox?

The cost is very affordable. We have been able to save a lot of time, approximately 30%. Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel fro...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Automox serves as a backbone tool for my company. We rely on Automox for application and operating system patching, which ensures that our machines remain compliant and secure. We also take advanta...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

We did conduct a long implementation which relates to what I think can be improved about Tenable Security Center. In some cases, we needed to refer back to Tenable itself, and in other cases, we ne...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tenable SC?

The typical use case for Tenable Security Center is that it is an on-premise solution, and it can use the agent and active scanning, which is needed by governmental organizations and manufacturers,...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 4% of the time

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 3% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

May 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

April 2026

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Overview

Automox offers automated patch management with cloud-native architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. It provides real-time visibility and streamlines operations across Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it ideal for complex IT environments.

Automox empowers organizations with features like Worklets and remote management, enhancing security and efficiency through customizable patching policies, PowerShell script execution, and detailed reporting. It's primarily used for automated patch management, patch remediation, and compliance maintenance across diverse systems, ensuring cybersecurity and reducing vulnerabilities. Enhancements are desired for user access control, policy synchronization, and integration with tools like Tenable. Support for offline patching, rollback features, enhanced reporting, and notification customization are in demand. Improvements in cost effectiveness and multi-group policy applications are also suggested.

What are the key features of Automox?

Automated Patching: Streamlines updates across operating systems.
Cloud-Native Architecture: Offers real-time visibility and ease of use.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Worklets: Custom scripts for automating tasks.
Remote Management: Manage devices from anywhere.
Custom Patching Policies: Tailor updates for specific needs.
Insights Reporting: Generate detailed reports to enhance efficiency.

What benefits and ROI can users expect when evaluating Automox?

Time Efficiency: Saves time by automating complex tasks.
Increased Security: Enhances security through effective patch management.
Compliance: Maintains cybersecurity compliance.
Network Visibility: Provides comprehensive device network oversight.
Scalable Management: Handles extensive network updates effectively.

In industry applications, Automox is widely used for managing and updating vast fleets of devices, particularly in sectors requiring stringent cybersecurity measures. It ensures seamless operations through its centralized automation and management capabilities, making it essential for organizations handling extensive IT networks.

Automox

Tenable Security Center offers vulnerability scanning, reporting, and customizable dashboards, aiding in security posture enhancement through Asset Discovery and Vulnerability Priority Rating. Its user-friendly interface and third-party integration support provide real-time insights and risk assessment.

Tenable Security Center efficiently manages vulnerabilities, offering valuable analytics, risk prioritization, and real-time insights. It supports automated updates, false-positive reduction, and compliance reporting. Users benefit from its asset discovery capabilities and its integrations with third-party tools. However, there's room for improvement in reporting customization, integration with tools like Jira, and the accuracy and speed of vulnerability scanning. The system could enhance its dynamic data displays, language support, and offer more pricing flexibility. While valued for scanning servers, workstations, and IoT devices, the setup complexity and policy modification challenges are noted.

What are the key features?

Vulnerability Scanning: Identifies and prioritizes security issues across environments.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed insights for informed decision-making and compliance.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor the interface to track and manage risks effectively.
Asset Discovery: Identifies network devices to enhance security posture.
Vulnerability Priority Rating: Helps in prioritizing actions based on risk levels.

What benefits should reviews highlight?

Risk Assessment: Provides real-time insights to prioritize security initiatives.
Compliance: Assists in meeting standards like NIST and CIS.
Integration: Seamless operation across IT processes for enhanced efficiency.
Patch Management: Ensures timely updates to reduce vulnerabilities.

Organizations in sectors like IT, finance, and healthcare implement Tenable Security Center for vulnerability management across internal and cloud networks. It facilitates compliance with industry standards and aids IT teams in conducting network-wide assessments, streamlining patch management, and strengthening overall security.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Tenable Security Center

April 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Tenable Security Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Tenable Security Center report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.