Automox vs Tenable Security Center comparison

Automox and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Automox is ranked #37 with an average rating of 9.0, while Tenable is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.1. Automox holds a 0.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Automox users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Automox

Read 20 Automox reviews

2,112 Views
781 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable Security Center

Read 56 Tenable Security Center reviews

7,756 Views
5,662 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Automox

Tenable Security Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Tenable Security Center and Automox are products in the cybersecurity realm, focusing on vulnerability and patch management. Automox is favored for ease of use and cloud-based automation, while Tenable Security Center is known for comprehensive features.

Features: Tenable Security Center offers robust vulnerability management including asset discovery, dynamic tracking, and advanced reporting. Automox focuses on automated patching, efficient security configuration, and IT asset management.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center could improve in its initial setup complexity, user interface simplicity, and transition towards cloud-native solutions. Automox may enhance its feature depth, expand integration options, and offer more detailed reporting capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automox provides quick, cloud-based deployment with minimal maintenance, supported by responsive customer service. Tenable Security Center requires detailed initial setup due to its broad feature set, but offers strong integration with existing infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Automox's predictable pricing leads to clear ROI benefits through low ownership costs and efficient resource utilization. Tenable Security Center has higher initial costs with licensing fees, but delivers strong ROI via advanced management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Automox vs. Tenable Security Center Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Tenable Security Center

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.3

Automox delivers positive ROI by automating patch management, enhancing security, reducing manual tasks, and improving operational efficiency.

Sentiment score

6.5

Tenable Security Center boosts ROI by minimizing costs, enhancing security, reducing manpower needs, and preventing costly data breaches.

It is a cloud-based solution, so you do not need on-premises infrastructure, which saves hardware.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

It has also been a great tool because we are able to reduce both manual labor and operational expenses by automating patching of roughly 200 Windows servers.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

Offered an additional remote solution, all while saving a lot of time and cost through troubleshooting.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

If we cannot adjust how to operate the solution, then it becomes very difficult, so hearing and initial tuning are very important.

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

Through the use of Tenable Security Center, my clients achieve more efficient patching and gain visibility and understanding of security operations, leading to improved resilience and infrastructure insight.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.6

Automox's customer service is praised for being effective, responsive, proactive, with quick solutions and superior support over competitors.

Sentiment score

7.4

Tenable Security Center customer support is responsive and knowledgeable, with U.S. support rated higher than the European counterpart.

They are really good because they don't take five days to get back to me; they respond within 24 hours with really good information.

Robert Araya

Network & Security Administrator at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

They're very knowledgeable and have given us many channels for support, including email, chat, and documentation.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The customer support has been excellent as the support team is always responsive and proactive.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

Longer response times and less thorough assistance.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

They are helpful and were very helpful to us, coordinating with us on several issues.

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

Automox efficiently scales across varied organizations, easily adds devices, but faces challenges in multi-tenant environments and occasional load issues.

Sentiment score

8.0

Tenable Security Center is praised for its seamless scalability, adaptability, and integration, accommodating diverse organizational needs and sizes effectively.

It's pretty easy to scale because it's SaaS, and adding more devices doesn't require any extra server or anything similar.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox scalability is excellent because it caters to my organization needs and can handle our organizational needs, ensuring that all our devices are well patched.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

Automox's scalability is excellent as it has continued to grow with my organization and caters to my organization's needs.

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

I can scale it extensively with the use of agents, allowing scanning in restrictive environments and loosely connected devices.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Scalability is a bit limited with Tenable Security Center.

Kevin Mwangi

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.4

Users praise Automox for its reliable performance, effective patching, stable agent, quick issue response, and consistent availability.

Sentiment score

8.0

Tenable Security Center is highly stable and reliable, handling large tasks efficiently with users rating its stability highly.

It's not crashing or experiencing any downtime.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

I have not experienced any lagging or downtime

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

I can confirm that Automox is very stable.

Joseph Mbugua

Project Manager at Shell

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

The stability of the solution is outstanding.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Room For Improvement

Automox requires enhancements in profile synchronization, access control, offline patching, reporting, and Linux/iOS remote support to improve management.

Users desire improved reporting, third-party integration, interface design, vulnerability handling, web scanning, pricing, support, and user-friendly features.

Anything that can predict imminent failure of the device would be great.

PaulWalker2

Software Engineer at Unilever Inc.

An alert of a security threat could be another type of notification that tells me something is important.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

The integration is seamless.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys.

Kevin Mwangi

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

The reports and plugins for reports and scans could benefit from enhancements.

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Translating reports into European languages is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Setup Cost

Automox provides cost-effective pricing for enterprises with mixed OS environments, featuring flexible plans, discounts, and free trials.

Tenable Security Center is costly per asset, with options including subscription and perpetual licenses, generally pricier than competitors.

Cost reduction has been noticeable, ranging from 50% to 40%, especially because we do not have to travel from one place to another to go on site and troubleshoot devices.

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Automox's price is very cost-effective and affordable.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

the price has always been competitive and very cost-effective

William Pep

Project Engineer at Unilever

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

The product is somewhat pricey, reflecting its valuable features and status as a high-quality solution in the vulnerability management market.

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pricing.

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.

Hiroshi Watanabe

Marketing Expert at J's communication

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Valuable Features

Automox's cloud-based platform offers automated patching, multi-OS compatibility, and seamless endpoint control, enhancing IT operations and security.

Tenable Security Center offers comprehensive vulnerability management with intuitive tools, strong integration, and flexible compliance for effective threat detection.

One of the best features I appreciate about Automox is automated patching.

Naqash Ahmed

Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford

Automox allows me to patch all devices regardless of the operating system.

Michael Fang

Quality Assurance Manager at Unilever

It has also improved our security posture since automated patching has allowed vulnerabilities to be patched automatically.

Dennis Mascot

Data at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Automox report

We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed.

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Tenable Security Center provides an overall score of vulnerabilities, comparing an organization with others in the same industry.

MB24

IT Helpdesk at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

The most effective feature of Tenable Security Center for detecting vulnerabilities is its capability for critical mapping.

Kevin Mwangi

Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Security Center report

Categories and Ranking

Automox

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

37th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (36th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (13th), Patch Management (14th)

Tenable Security Center

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (14th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Automox is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 3.1%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Security Center	3.1%
Automox	0.5%
Other	96.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Raphael Tiji

Senior Software Engineer at AT&T

Unified patching and remote access have strengthened security and reduced support overhead

Automox has significant potential and we truly appreciate its features and capabilities. However, we have encountered several performance issues, particularly with the remote access tool. We believe that with some improvement, it could replace other tools that we currently use. Exclusion for updates should be improved in Automox. Integration with Tenable vulnerability management should be improved, as it should be included. I do not have any other improvements needed for Automox that I have not mentioned yet, perhaps only small or wish-list features.

Read full review

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Centralized analytics have strengthened patch visibility and support efficient regulatory reporting

From my experience, I assess the product's analytics capabilities as successful. It helped us significantly with patching and managing the risk of the patching process across all our environments, including network devices with Windows and Unix systems. The product covered several environments and gave us exactly what we needed in our environment. Tenable Security Center's centralized platform helped with risk assessment and management across our IT environments. It covered the patching process, and we previously faced many issues regarding how to patch different environments, how to monitor the patching process, and whether it was successful or not. We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed. This gave us good details about the process which helped us significantly in our reporting and even in audits, whether internal or external. We learned how to close audit issues safely and successfully. We used the dashboards for real-time threat insights and extracted several dashboards from Tenable Security Center. We use these dashboards in our cybersecurity dashboard and committees that we have. These dashboards are part of our committees, especially the cybersecurity committee and other committees that we attend.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Automox?

Automox needs some improvement, particularly in that remote support for Linux is lacking. Additionally, remote support for iOS could be better. The integration is seamless.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automox?

Our main use case for Automox is that we as a company need to be Cyber Security Plus compliant, and therefore we need to ensure that our devices are patched regularly. Having over 1,000 devices, ma...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Automox?

Automox is a modern, simple-to-use, and powerful tool that works well for all sizes of organizations that have a mix of remote, hybrid, and endpoints. Automated patching is a key strength of Automo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

We did conduct a long implementation which relates to what I think can be improved about Tenable Security Center. In some cases, we needed to refer back to Tenable itself, and in other cases, we ne...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Automox

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Automox

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Automox

Compared 7% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Automox

Compared 6% of the time

More Automox Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 5% of the time

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automox

March 2026

Download Automox product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

March 2026

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Overview

Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

Automox

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Buyer's Guide

Automox vs. Tenable Security Center

March 2026

Free Report: Automox vs. Tenable Security Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Automox vs. Tenable Security Center and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Automox vs. Tenable Security Center report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.