"The studio design is fine compared to other similar products. There is nothing extraordinary about it, but at the same time, there are not any negatives."
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"In the future, they should have a similar version for the cloud and on-premises, and the installation should be flawless within few minutes."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
AutomationEdge is ranked 30th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 1 review while Inflectra Rapise is ranked 18th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews. AutomationEdge is rated 6.0, while Inflectra Rapise is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutomationEdge writes "Speeds up execution times, stable cloud version, but installation complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "Enables us to automate functional testing of end-to-end test cases for evaluating the impact on the databases ". AutomationEdge is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), UiPath, Blue Prism and EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, whereas Inflectra Rapise is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, UiPath, Micro Focus UFT Developer, Selenium HQ and Katalon Studio.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
