We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"They are not going for any add-ons right now. It's the same version we are still using and there is no plan of upgrading and/or creating any add-ons at all."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and Camunda. See our AuraQuantic vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.