AuditBoard vs Methodware Kairos comparison

AuditBoard and Methodware are both solutions in the GRC category. AuditBoard is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Methodware is ranked #52. AuditBoard holds a 6.3% mindshare in G, compared to Methodware’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of AuditBoard users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Methodware users who would recommend it.

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

1,625 Views
1,463 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Methodware Kairos

Read 2 Methodware Kairos reviews

114 Views
114 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Methodware Kairos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Methodware Kairos and AuditBoard are key players in the audit and compliance management sector. AuditBoard often leads due to its extensive features, whereas Methodware Kairos is favored for its affordability and excellent customer service, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

Features: Methodware Kairos features customizable dashboards, robust risk management, and adaptability for in-depth analysis. AuditBoard provides a user-friendly interface, seamless integration with existing software, and streamlined auditing processes. These features highlight Methodware Kairos's focus on flexibility and detail, contrasted with AuditBoard's emphasis on user experience and integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Methodware Kairos offers a straightforward deployment model that minimizes downtime and a responsive support team. AuditBoard delivers cloud-based deployment, a structured implementation path, and extensive training resources. Methodware Kairos is noted for quick setup, while AuditBoard's systematic onboarding process enhances customer experience.

Pricing and ROI: Methodware Kairos is cost-effective, supports flexible pricing, and delivers value for budget-limited businesses, ensuring good ROI. AuditBoard's higher upfront costs are balanced by its advanced features, appealing to organizations aiming for strategic advantages. Methodware Kairos is ideal for cost-sensitive buyers, while AuditBoard suits those seeking comprehensive features, justifying its investment.

To learn more, read our detailed AuditBoard vs. Methodware Kairos Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Methodware Kairos

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AuditBoard

Ranking in GRC

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (9th)

Methodware Kairos

Ranking in GRC

52nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of AuditBoard is 6.3%, up from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Methodware Kairos is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AuditBoard	6.3%
Methodware Kairos	0.3%
Other	93.4%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gopichand Rajbhar

IT GRC Manager at Capgemini

User-friendly, simple to implement, and has lots of features

There are lots of features. We like the reviewer and auditor, where they support you if you want to upload evidence. At the same time the reviewer or auditor can also put their remark. The solution is user-friendly. It's easy to set up. You can easily find out how to proceed for reassessment, how to upload that evidence, and how you can put in a remark. Everything is a single console where you can easily track what you need. It's stable. The product is scalable. They provide a demo to customers to allow them to explore the tools.

Read full review

Sumeet Malhotra

Managing Partner at Tata Consultancy

Meeting industry standards now and for the future, straightforward setup, with reliability

The most valuable feature is the user-friendly mechanism that makes it possible to easily integrate its data with external, contextually important data, so that wholistic data analytics can be performed from a GRC perspective. At TCS, we have created add-ons to allow this software to be able to import and export data using industry standards like OMG’s XMI (XML Metadata Interchange).

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of AuditBoard is its ability to facilitate the editing of work papers in a seamless and efficient manner. This is achieved through a built-in tool that allows for real-time editing without the need for downloading the working paper. This feature has proven to be incredibly time-saving for me as it eliminates the step of having to download the file and make changes, instead providing an easy-to-access "edit work paper" option. Overall, this feature has greatly improved my experience with AuditBoard and has been a significant contributor to its success in my opinion."

"AuditBoard is very user-friendly compared to other audit management software I have used in the past."

"The most significant feature of AuditBoard is its community tools. It provides an internal communication platform that enables users to communicate within the system rather than relying on external tools such as Outlook or Microsoft products. By communicating within the system, all interactions are centralized and accessible, promoting a streamlined workflow."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"I find the most significant elements of this solution are the out-of-the-box reporting, the ease of workflow, workflow management, and the ease of managing our audit process."

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"There are lots of features."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

More AuditBoard pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to import and export using industry standards like XMI and XML metadata interchange managing the data in and data out."

Cons

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"Everything is there, and I have no disadvantage to note as of now."

"AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

More AuditBoard cons

"We are currently working on making Essence one hundred percent compliant and we are not there yet."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AuditBoard?

It consolidates the E2E process in one single solution, and in a very user friendly environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AuditBoard?

AuditBoard is overly simple in some instances and there needs to be flexibility to make it more robust. For IBM OpenPages, the reporting can be more robust as the summary report on each of the modu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AuditBoard?

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 32% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 20% of the time

OneTrust GRC vs AuditBoard

Compared 19% of the time

LogicGate vs AuditBoard

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow Vendor Risk Management vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

September 2025

Download AuditBoard product report

Buyer's Guide

GRC

August 2025

Download Methodware Kairos product report

Also Known As

No data available

Kairos

Overview

AuditBoard is the leading cloud-based platform transforming audit, risk, and compliance management. More than 35% of the Fortune 500 leverage AuditBoard to move their businesses forward with greater clarity and agility. AuditBoard is top-rated by customers on G2, Capterra, and Gartner Peer Insights, and was recently ranked for the fourth year in a row as one of the fastest-growing technology companies in North America by Deloitte. To learn more, visit: AuditBoard.com.

AuditBoard

Kairos is a fully integrated and comprehensive governance, risk and compliance solution

Methodware

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Global Insurance Syndicate

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard vs. Methodware Kairos

September 2025

Free Report: AuditBoard vs. Methodware Kairos

Find out what your peers are saying about AuditBoard vs. Methodware Kairos and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuditBoard vs. Methodware Kairos report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.