Atlas vs Horizons comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlas Logo
670 views|512 comparisons
Horizons Logo
85 views|63 comparisons
Ranking
5th
out of 27 in Global Payroll
Views
670
Comparisons
512
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
out of 27 in Global Payroll
Views
85
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Deel logo
Compared 43% of the time.
SAP SuccessFactors logo
Compared 15% of the time.
PeopleSoft logo
Compared 10% of the time.
UKG logo
Compared 10% of the time.
Workday logo
Compared 9% of the time.
Learn More
Atlas
Video Not Available
Horizons
Video Not Available
Overview

Atlas is a robust platform that spans every conceivable aspect of your human experience management strategy. You can fast-track global ambition. You can simplify cross-border HR set-up. You’ll be compliant with the world’s employment laws. All thanks to one, easy-to-use platform built specifically for delivering Direct EOR solutions.

One Platform. Multiple Benefits.
Hire in any country in the world and streamline your payroll, compliance and benefits administration with our market-leading platform.

Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Comms Service Provider6%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
Manufacturing Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available

Atlas is ranked 5th in Global Payroll while Horizons is ranked 23rd in Global Payroll. Atlas is rated 0.0, while Horizons is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Atlas is most compared with Deel, SAP SuccessFactors, PeopleSoft, UKG and Workday, whereas Horizons is most compared with Deel and Remote.

See our list of best Global Payroll vendors.

We monitor all Global Payroll reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.