Atera vs SymphonyAI IT Service Management comparison

Atera and SymphonyAI are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Atera is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0, while SymphonyAI is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. Atera holds a 2.3% mindshare in ISM, compared to SymphonyAI’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SymphonyAI users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

943 Views
69 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SymphonyAI IT Service Manag...

Read 5 SymphonyAI IT Service Management reviews

423 Views
220 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

SymphonyAI IT Service Manag...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SymphonyAI IT Service Management and Atera are competing in the IT service management category. Atera appears to be favored for its all-in-one platform and ease of use compared to SymphonyAI's advanced analytics.

Features: SymphonyAI IT Service Management is recognized for robust analytics, automation tools, and offering in-depth insights into process optimization. Atera stands out with its integrated platform for remote monitoring, management, and automation, which includes remote access capabilities, script libraries, and cross-platform solutions, making it an excellent choice for smaller IT teams seeking versatility and ease of use.

Room for Improvement: SymphonyAI could improve by simplifying its complex setup for easier learning and better integration with small-scale environments. Enhancing user interface intuitiveness and offering more scalable customer support could also be beneficial. For Atera, improvements can focus on expanding automation capabilities, offering advanced analytics similar to SymphonyAI, and enhancing individual feature capabilities for larger enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SymphonyAI IT Service Management is well-suited for large enterprises and customizable deployment but comes with a steeper learning curve. Atera offers a fast setup and provides responsive and helpful support, particularly advantageous for organizations lacking extensive IT support teams.

Pricing and ROI: SymphonyAI involves higher initial setup costs but offers long-term value through its advanced features and potential efficiency gains, appealing to larger enterprises. Atera offers a cost-effective subscription model with lower initial investments, providing a good ROI for smaller businesses due to its streamlined services and effective resource utilization.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

14th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (4th), Patch Management (11th)

SymphonyAI IT Service Manag...

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

22nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (22nd), IT Asset Management (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 2.3%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SymphonyAI IT Service Management is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Service Management (ITSM)

Featured Reviews

James Clowes

IT Manager at Dynamic Bradview Roofing

Having fewer hardware replacements saves us in annual costs

There is a new version of the interface coming out. I have been asking for a new version for a while. While the interface is nice, I guess the developer thinks one way and the user thinks another. So, I think the interface is getting a big overhaul. This is what they have mentioned in their webinars and stuff. It is in beta, but I'm not on the beta program, so I haven't seen it. I can't really complain about the old interface, but now that I have heard there is a new one coming, all I want is the new one. The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client. Reports are fine for internal use, where they never leave your company. However, if I was an MSP, I would probably want a little bit more information or the ability to customize some of it without having to edit PDFs.

Read full review

Abhishek Bhosle

IT Specialist at Tata AIA

Good ticketing tool but limitations with integration

We use ManageEngine, but it's still pretty new and under development. We used SummitAI for about four years before switching to ManageEngine. There are specific features that were missing in SummitAI that we're hoping to find in ManageEngine. We were informed that ManageEngine was a new ticketing tool with modern and advanced analytics, which would be a better fit than SummitAI with its older engine. Firstly, ManageEngine allows detailed asset inventory per user. I, as a user, can store authentication details like which laptop and mobile I use, for all employees. Secondly, ManageEngine can handle patching, Windows updates, and pushing applications from the server to desktops. Finally, ManageEngine lets us do remote access directly through the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Measuring the integration is very helpful when using Atera Assist Test. It takes the solution to the next level by automating activities. It doesn't just provide the solution but also allows running scripts to fix issues before a technician has to work on them."

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"All of the features of Atera are valuable because they allow the customers to achieve their goals. It is easy to use, has good collaboration, and has zero maintenance."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"It is reliable, and when it is working, it works without issues."

"The most valuable features of this solution are automatic batch matching and unattended support access."

"I have better access when I go to look for something regarding either a specific user or software. It is easier to locate. When I am troubleshooting with my clients on the phone, I am not fiddling around looking through a bunch of ticket notes trying to locate something. It makes me a lot more efficient."

More Atera pros

"It was easy to access and fast. Our experience using it solely as a ticketing tool. We used fetch reports from the tool, particularly with regard to SLA tracking for our partners."

"SummitAI IT Management Suite's chat box feature has reduced our service discount, and because it's intelligent, the responses that go out to the users have improved, and the resolutions are much faster."

"The product has the best features for ITSM."

"The most valuable feature is remote access. People are working from home, and we can take remote access through it."

Cons

"Customization could be improved."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great."

"It will be interesting if Atera can integrate all kinds of products. In North America, there are a lot of resellers, like Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Arrow Electronics, etc. It would be amazing if Atera could integrate with these products. If they could integrate with these products for MSPs, it would be much easier. Then, if you are buying something, and need to add something, you don't need to jump from place to place because this is a very quick sales instrument for use on a daily basis."

"There should be enhancements in network monitoring capabilities beyond just physical devices like computers and servers. It would be beneficial to include better tools for monitoring networking infrastructure such as routers. Additionally, while Atera excels in ticket management, I believe there's room for improvement in user authentication and security features, especially when accessing and managing remote equipment. These updates would contribute to a more robust and secure user experience overall. Atera should include a monitoring tool integrated with Azure or similar cloud platforms. It would be beneficial to have capabilities for monitoring network growth and automatically generating statistics based on system stability and performance metrics. This feature would help us better manage and optimize our equipment and network resources, especially for strategic customer planning and resource allocation."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"There is definitely room for improvement with its automation capabilities."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer. This needs to improve so that there is a particular feature that can provide support to customers even if they are not connected to a computer."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

More Atera cons

"SummitAI IT Management Suite's project management and operational management features could be improved."

"I would like them to add software inventory in the next release. We don't have that right now."

"Integration was a major limitation with SummitAI."

"There could be flexibility in terms of customization."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"The value of the product is perfect, neither cheap nor expensive. I think it is the right rate. It would be awesome if it continued to be the same price because it is a great solution that I like. I like it because I'm not paying per device. I have some customers on monthly contracts and some of them are on break'n fix. If I have a client who is on break'n fix, and they need to pay per agent, then I am losing money. If they were ever to change structures, going to pay-per-device model, then I would need to think about changing to something else."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

"Pricing is my favorite part of it. It was per user, not per client."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"SummitAI IT Management Suite's pricing is a bit expensive."

"The product's cost is average."

"We have a regular license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

It should improve its processes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.

See all answers

What do you like most about SummitAI IT Management Suite?

It was easy to access and fast. Our experience using it solely as a ticketing tool. We used fetch reports from the tool, particularly with regard to SLA tracking for our partners.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SummitAI IT Management Suite?

The product's cost is average. It used to be inexpensive, but now they have added many functionalities. Still, it is cheaper than other more significant tools in the market. The suite is not just l...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SummitAI IT Management Suite?

Integration was a major limitation with SummitAI. Features we need are available in ManageEngine, making it a better fit. Secondly, the cost of SummitAI was a challenge. Finally, company policies o...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 23% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Atera

Compared 15% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

More Atera Competitors

ServiceNow vs SymphonyAI IT Service Management

Compared 83% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs SymphonyAI IT Service Management

Compared 17% of the time

More SymphonyAI IT Service Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

June 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Service Management (ITSM)

May 2025

Download SymphonyAI IT Service Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Summus IT Management Suite

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

SymphonyAI provides an AI-powered IT Service Management (ITSM) platform aimed at enhancing IT service delivery efficiency and effectiveness. The platform, SymphonyAI ITSM, offers a unified service portal for streamlined user assistance and incorporates reporting and analytics functionalities to furnish insights into IT service performance. By leveraging artificial intelligence, SymphonyAI aims to optimize ITSM processes, aligning IT services with business needs while ensuring cost efficiency.

SymphonyAI

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Magma, Toyota, Evidera, Netik, KPMG, Innodata, ABB, DAIKIN, Toshiba, Emerson, Dell, Pansonic, DBS, PWC, EY, Hexaware Technologies, Deloitte, NEC, Birla Soft, Panasonic, Harman, SBI, Kotak Life Insurance, SREI, Marico, Perfetti, Manipal Hospitals, Maruti Suzuki, Royal Enfield, Toyota, CEAT, ABB, L&T, VIP, Knight Frank, Adithya Birla

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management

June 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. SymphonyAI IT Service Management report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.