Atera vs GLPI by Teclib comparison

Atera and Teclib' are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. Atera is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0, while Teclib' is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Teclib' users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 15 Atera reviews

1,129 Views
727 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

GLPI by Teclib

Read 7 GLPI by Teclib reviews

313 Views
122 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atera

GLPI by Teclib

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Atera and GLPI by Teclib are competing IT management solutions. Atera seems to have the upper hand in user satisfaction, while GLPI might be superior in terms of comprehensive features, which many see as worth the higher cost.

Features: Atera provides remote monitoring and management, an integrated billing system, and automated patch management. Its platform allows for seamless automation and device management. GLPI excels in asset management, ticketing, and ITIL-compliant service management. Additionally, it offers configuration management, license management, and the ability to customize asset reports.

Room for Improvement: Atera could enhance their scripting functionalities and expand third-party integrations. The user interface might benefit from more customization options. Network monitoring depth could be improved. GLPI by Teclib may need to simplify its deployment process, improve the learning curve for new users, and enhance the support resources available for troubleshooting complex customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Atera offers a cloud-based deployment known for its simplicity and responsive support. It ensures straightforward integration for IT environments. GLPI by Teclib provides both on-premise and cloud options, catering to various infrastructure needs but involving a more complex setup. Atera's quick start contrasts with GLPI's flexible yet demanding implementation.

Pricing and ROI: Atera's pricing is known for being predictable with a per-technician model, providing a swift ROI due to lower upfront costs. Users appreciate its cost-effectiveness and transparency. GLPI by Teclib involves a more complex cost structure with its extensive features, translating into a longer-term ROI. While Atera offers immediate financial benefits, GLPI could be more advantageous if comprehensive feature utilization is aligned with long-term business goals.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. GLPI by Teclib Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. GLPI by Teclib

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

13th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (4th), Patch Management (11th)

GLPI by Teclib

Ranking in IT Service Management (ITSM)

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

James Clowes

IT Manager at Dynamic Bradview Roofing

Having fewer hardware replacements saves us in annual costs

There is a new version of the interface coming out. I have been asking for a new version for a while. While the interface is nice, I guess the developer thinks one way and the user thinks another. So, I think the interface is getting a big overhaul. This is what they have mentioned in their webinars and stuff. It is in beta, but I'm not on the beta program, so I haven't seen it. I can't really complain about the old interface, but now that I have heard there is a new one coming, all I want is the new one. The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client. Reports are fine for internal use, where they never leave your company. However, if I was an MSP, I would probably want a little bit more information or the ability to customize some of it without having to edit PDFs.

Read full review

Dexter De Torres

ITSM Manager at Stratpoint Global Outsourcing, Inc.

Simple to use and very easy to deploy

For the free version, the tool should improve the graphics as it is kind of old school. The graphics are very flat compared to Google Workspace and Office 365. If you are not concerned about aesthetics, it is a fine tool. It is a good tool if you are more focused on the functionality. There are some bugs in the tool because it has a lot of features. Correlating all of the features can sometimes cause the tool to fail. If you create a ticket and then link it to an asset, there can arise some issues, but with support, one can customize and fix the issues in the product. The cost of the tool is an area of concern since it is 19 Euros per agent for a month. If your help desk team is of ten people, then you can multiply 19 Euros by ten people. The updates will be automatic if you get the tool's cloud version, but for the free version, you need to learn how to manage or administer Linux, PHP, and Apache because you will be updating the system manually. The updates are available, but you need to ensure that you have a test environment first before you apply it to the production environment because sometimes the updates mess up the data. I need to have a test environment first before loading it, but aside from the system, you also need to update the OS, PHP, and the web server itself. A lot of administrative tasks are needed if it is the free version, but for the cloud, you just use the product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Pricing is definitely my favorite part of it. It is also extremely easy to use."

"It is reliable, and when it is working, it works without issues."

"I would say it's the number one tool for all ITMS."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"Atera has saved our organization money. We look at Atera as an extra employee that we only pay about $300 a month. This is incredible savings over having to hire somebody to do all the tasks that Atera performs for us."

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"Atera has helped me to provide more accurate solutions based on a given problem. For example, we base our solutions on event scenarios, like the alerts. We identify that there's a series of problems occurring in a particular area from the information provided by the alerts."

"Measuring the integration is very helpful when using Atera Assist Test. It takes the solution to the next level by automating activities. It doesn't just provide the solution but also allows running scripts to fix issues before a technician has to work on them."

More Atera pros

"The most valuable features of GLPI are asset management, asset tracking, asset reporting, and ticket management. We use it as a configuration management database (CMDB), which is very useful for impact assessment and change management. The license management feature is also beneficial because it is bundled with asset management. When an agent reports a certain set into the database, all the software running on that host or server is assessed, collected, and reported. This makes license management very useful. Since implementing GLPI, we've noticed that our IT operations are more stable. The tool allows us to manage changes in the environment more effectively by creating change requests for assets. GLPI supports our processes, allowing us to organize IT operations with custom forms and workflows, making it quite flexible. Although the deployment is still in progress, we see significant benefits in organizing our IT processes with this tool."

"The most valuable features of GLPI are its ITSM capabilities, including ticketing, automatic tasks, plugins, and notification systems."

"The product is very easy to deploy."

"The tool's most valuable features include UI, visualization, and data scraping."

"The product is user-friendly."

"The best feature for me is the power of customization, allowing us to add extensions from each place of GLPI."

"GLPI helps with tracking device assets. For example, when I assign a laptop to an employee, the GLPI agent installed on the client device gathers detailed information about it."

Cons

"They are working on an update, and I would like to see more stuff outside of just computers and servers. Increasingly, we need to be able to monitor and manage network devices. Atera is improving on that already, which is one place that it is currently lacking."

"I also use Apple Zoho, which does not require you to download anything. You can get help from Zoho. Atera, on the other hand, requires you to download an applet."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"The billing module has a standard layout which is too limited for my needs."

"It should improve its processes."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer. This needs to improve so that there is a particular feature that can provide support to customers even if they are not connected to a computer."

"The solution is scalable. However, in the past, we did have some issues."

More Atera cons

"I've encountered some issues with GLPI. The official documentation on the GLPI website recommends using PHP version 8.3, but it used to recommend PHP version 8.2."

"The solution must be more flexible."

"The solution has occasional lags and glitches."

"The stability of Windows OS could be enhanced."

"A stringent plugin management would benefit GLPI. You can extend GLPI with many plugins, but plugin development is handled by individuals worldwide. Since it's an open-source solution, plugins are developed independently, and you never know which plugin is compatible with your version of GLPI. I would suggest that the developers focus more on plugin management to ensure plugins are more consistent and compatible with most versions of GLPI. Currently, you always have to check if a plugin works with your GLPI install, which can be inconvenient."

"One area for improvement is the occasional issues we encounter, which are not directly related to GLPI but are due to network providers. These include network errors like 502 and 504, indicating some failure in network communication with the server."

"For the free version, the tool should improve the graphics as it is kind of old school. The graphics are very flat compared to Google Workspace and Office 365."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"Atera happened to have the best pricing model."

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"I have used the tool's open-source version...GLPI Network Cloud is 19 Euros per month. It comes with one agent only, but if you use the IT asset management part, it is unlimited."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Retailer

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

Pricing is low. It costs around 149 bucks per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

It should improve its processes.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

Atera is integral to our daily operations. We use it for RMM, PSA, our ticket system, and contact with people. We also integrate it with different products.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GLPI by Teclib?

I have three suggestions for improvement. First, I would like to see the form creator as a native feature instead of a plugin. Second, the ability to generate custom fields in the tables should be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GLPI by Teclib?

I manage an information technology company in Brazil, which is a small company with fewer than ten employees. Our service catalog focuses on system development and IT infrastructure management. We ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GLPI by Teclib?

I always advise that GLPI is a very flexible tool that can be adjusted to fit various business processes, not just for technology companies. All features in the community edition are available with...

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 36% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Atera

Compared 13% of the time

N-able N-central vs Atera

Compared 9% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs Atera

Compared 8% of the time

Freshservice vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

More Atera Competitors

OTRS vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 29% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ITSM vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 14% of the time

NinjaOne vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus vs GLPI by Teclib

Compared 13% of the time

More GLPI by Teclib Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

May 2025

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

GLPI by Teclib

April 2025

Download GLPI by Teclib product report

Overview

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Thousands of paying users in over 75 countries
Free 30-day trial, no credit card or commitment required
No hidden fees or restrictions, all plans include unlimited devices
Seamless integration with your favorite IT tools including: Splashtop, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, and ScreenConnect

What can Atera do for you?

Improve Efficiency. Atera delivers customers the tool suite for IT management. Everything you need in an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform.
Automation. Set alerts and proactively prevent issues for your clients. Minimize time spent on manual tasks and spend more time on what matters most, serving your customers.
Disruptive Pricing, Unlimited Devices. Per technician-based pricing with unlimited servers and workstations means you can cover it all, at one fixed price.

Atera

GLPI by Teclib focuses on asset management and ticketing, utilizing agent-based asset tracking and offering integration with systems like Active Directory. It also serves as a CMDB, supporting functions such as financial and contract management alongside project tools and network monitoring.

GLPI by Teclib is leveraged for its comprehensive ITSM capabilities, allowing organizations to manage assets and support tickets effectively. It offers integration with LDAP and Active Directory for seamless asset tracking and ticket management. Financial tracking, contract management, and project tools bolster its functionality, while network monitoring and software inventory provide additional insights. Customization through plugins enhances its adaptability, operating efficiently across Linux servers. Despite challenges like plugin management and PHP issues, improvements in features such as communication error handling and permission flexibility can enhance its IT operations further.

What are the key features of GLPI by Teclib?

Asset Management: Tracks and manages company hardware and software assets efficiently.
Ticket Management: Streamlines user support through well-structured ticket handling.
CMDB: Offers a centralized configuration management database for IT infrastructures.
Financial Tracking: Monitors expenditures related to assets and IT services.
Contract Management: Simplifies tracking and managing vendor contracts and SLAs.
Project Tools: Assists in managing IT projects with integrated tools.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Customization: Adapts to team needs with extensive plugin support.
User Experience: Provides a comprehensive interface, enhancing ease of use.
ITSM Flexibility: Automation and notification features streamline workflow.
Stability: Promotes organized IT operations with robust tracking.
Data Visualization: Offers insightful data presentation for informed decision-making.

GLPI by Teclib finds application across industries for its extensive ITSM functionalities. IT departments in healthcare, education, and finance sectors rely on it for efficient asset management and support ticket handling. Its role as a CMDB aids organizations in maintaining detailed records of their IT environments, while financial tracking and contract management functionalities cater to stringent compliance and regulatory needs. Educational institutions leverage GLPI's project management and network monitoring capabilities to oversee IT services and infrastructure effectively.

Teclib'

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. GLPI by Teclib

April 2025

Free Report: Atera vs. GLPI by Teclib

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. GLPI by Teclib and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. GLPI by Teclib report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.