Ataccama ONE Platform vs Collibra Governance comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Ataccama ONE Platform
Ranking in Data Governance
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Data Quality (8th), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (5th)
Collibra Governance
Ranking in Data Governance
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Ataccama ONE Platform is 2.4%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Collibra Governance is 9.5%, down from 14.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance
Unique Categories:
Data Quality
4.7%
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
2.8%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Gazi Salauddin - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 27, 2023
Robust data management and governance praised for its user-friendly interface and scalability, but potential drawbacks include the need for improvements in search functionality
The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance. They extract rules, and create factor automation, ensuring streamlined governance, especially for similar classifieds. The process involves defined steps and adjustable parameters that seamlessly integrate into the worklist components. Daily operations and background runs are accommodated within the workflow, maximizing possibilities for Acronis use cases. Data profiling and masking, where understanding data details is crucial for security without compromising confidentiality. is well-utilized across different fronts, offering a user-friendly experience for making decisions on data storage, classification, and mapping. The front-end interface is particularly commendable, facilitating easy understanding, and the back-end process in Ataccama ensures the completion of classifier profiling and metadata tagging.
Narsimha Desidi - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 13, 2023
Good transparency, increased data visibility, and very customizable
Before implementing data governance, the customer had a pain point of identifying the data and providing data useful to their business. That was the biggest challenge. There were also many data quality jobs where the customer wanted to find and identify the data in terms of where the data is sitting and who was responsible for it, et cetera. We were able to identify data sources, which applications were available within the organization, the domain level, and more to clarify exactly what was happening, where reports were sitting, who was connected to what, where data was coming from, and more. It also helps clarify job roles and showed access to identify where pain points were to get an overall picture of the data of the entire organization.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."
"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward."
"The ease of use of the user console is valuable."
"The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes."
"The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance."
"The solution's most valuable features are its scalability and how it can be integrated to any other intakes."
"It enables a linear view of the data assets across different levels, providing a comprehensive understanding."
"From the perspective of a data user, the solution has a great search capability."
"The most valuable features of Collibra Governance are that it is user-friendly and easy to use."
"I like Collibra's flexibility. I like to be able to modify things for our own use. For example, we've chosen to use Collibra also as a knowledge management tool, even though it is not designed to be a knowledge management tool. That's the beauty of it. It can serve as a knowledge management tool by creating some custom assets specifically for knowledge management."
"The end-to-end solution itself is great. The most valuable is the workload feature that Collibra offers. There is a vast amount of flexibility in terms of how much we can customize. It gives us a lot of options to implement for a lot of purposes."
"I like the lineage feature the most because I don't think there's any other tool that actually depicts the data flow from multiple sources and the connectivities between every data element inside those sources."
"The automation process is very strong."
 

Cons

"Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution."
"I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres."
"Data movement is a pain."
"There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria."
"It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."
"The UI is good if you happen to be an administrator and are familiar with the technical side of the administration. If you're a business user, the UI is not good. It is hard to learn. It is hard for those who are administering it to teach to end-users and it can take hours of training to do it. Because it is difficult and non-intuitive, business users resist using it. It is a battle to get them on board and to keep them engaged because of the UI."
"The connectors are not very sophisticated. They can do, for example, Informatica and Tableau, but the connectors themselves could be improved."
"The solution's metadata management is pretty novice and could be improved."
"The connectors for metadata ingestion need to be improved."
"The solution's search functionality can be improved"
"The workflows and the language they use needs to be improved."
"Collibra is not very user-friendly in terms of lineage generation. The lineage generation process is quite tough, and it takes lots of time to understand it. Business staff are also struggling to generate lineages and to understand them. So, it is not very user-friendly."
"I would like to see a feature using the runtime dashboard."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."
"It is substantial, and we do pay yearly."
"Collibra is a bit expensive."
"I would say it's probably in line with what other vendors charge for licensing."
"There are different levels of licenses. For example, some users can only do read-only licenses, and others have the stewardship license where they can give access to users."
"We purchase its annual license. There is an extra cost for additional users."
"Generally, it is a rather expensive solution compared to some other tools in the market, but I found it to be fair-priced for its capabilities."
"Collibra Governance is extremely expensive"
"I am not so much aware of price details. Initially, there was an add-on NuSoft license to use the DVC connector that NuSoft gives to create integrations, but Collibra is now phasing out of it slowly. Collibra is cutting ties with them is what we have been led to believe, and we have started developing on Spring Boot, which is open source."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ataccama ONE Platform: looking for your advice on plugging functionality gaps
Here are some thoughts on how to fill the gaps in Ataccama's Metadata Management capabilities, as reported by others: Use other EMM tools Several other EMM tools focus on technical metadata, such ...
What do you like most about Ataccama ONE Platform?
The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.
What needs improvement with Ataccama ONE Platform?
The focus for future improvements lies in strengthening the handling of unstructured data. This entails adapting to new environments, extracting data from platforms such as Slack or Teams, and crea...
What do you like most about Collibra Governance?
We use the solution's Data Stewardship part.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Collibra Governance?
Collibra Governance is extremely expensive. The solution is provided as a whole package, and users cannot avail of only a particular set of features; the whole package must be purchased even if it'...
What needs improvement with Collibra Governance?
The solution's search functionality can be improved. For instance, if I search with one piece of data, the tool provides a granular level of data and sometimes billions of data results, among which...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Collibra
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
Ministry of Economy Science and Innovation, Aspen Insurance, Barry Callebaut, Colt
Find out what your peers are saying about Ataccama ONE Platform vs. Collibra Governance and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.