Ataccama ONE Platform vs Profisee comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ataccama Logo
232 views|167 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Profisee Logo
2,002 views|1,129 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ataccama ONE Platform and Profisee based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Quality Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The drag-and-drop feature is incredibly flexible and straightforward.""The desktop version of the solution was particularly valuable to me, primarily for creating components. We opted for the data quality aspect to assess the quality of our data warehouse. The functionalities available allowed us to not only check data quality but also serve as an ETL tool. This versatility enabled data transformation and storage in various formats, including files on platforms like SharePoint or local online directories. The flexibility of the tool catered to the specific needs of those building components, contributing to our desired outcomes.""The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.""The ease of use of the user console is valuable.""The product’s important feature is data profiling and quality check."

More Ataccama ONE Platform Pros →

"The product is able to utilize the SQL server toolkit and it has tight integration with the SQL server.""The process of categorizing data, creating glossaries, and generating metadata is streamlined and less time-consuming.""We really like the matching and merging features."

More Profisee Pros →

Cons
"Data movement is a pain.""There is a notable challenge in having to provide detailed filters before the site recognizes the search criteria.""Speaking specifically about the version we use, version 12.3, I'm unsure if this has been addressed in subsequent versions. One improvement I'd like to see pertains to the language used in certain components, especially in data quality checks. The language complexity posed a challenge for beginners. Although we had on-site assistance from Ataccama, making it manageable for us, some individuals found it difficult to comprehend, necessitating additional support. The provision of a comprehensive guide for on-premise installation can also be enhanced. The lack of detailed information on the solution's workings and the overwhelming nature of notifications, with extensive content, were areas of concern. Streamlining the notification content in newer versions would significantly expedite issue resolution.""I believe it would be beneficial if it could enhance its flexibility to connect with a wider range of downstream systems beyond just Excel and Postgres.""It is complicated to fetch 20-25 reports when we profile the data."

More Ataccama ONE Platform Cons →

"When we updated to version 7.1, there were some workflow issues.""A more convenient approach would involve integrating all the pre-existing elements into Profisee itself.""The way training is laid out in their Profisee University, makes it really, really hard to find what you need fast."

More Profisee Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is reasonably priced."
  • "Despite not being extremely low-cost, the pricing appears reasonable, making it a profitable and viable choice for companies that prioritize data security and adhere to specific policies."
  • "Our licensing model wasn't user-specific; instead, we paid fees for the engine and maintenance. As we didn't have a support contract, maintenance fees were likely nonexistent. Regarding the upgrade, we had an account for the initial two or three years, and considering the features provided by the solution, the pricing was reasonable."
  • More Ataccama ONE Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We didn't come across any additional licensing fees."
  • "The pricing is moderate, falling in the middle range—not excessively low nor overly expensive."
  • More Profisee Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Here are some thoughts on how to fill the gaps in Ataccama's Metadata Management capabilities, as reported by others Use other EMM tools Several other EMM tools focus on technical metadata, such… more »
    Top Answer:The notable aspect lies in the workflow structure, where building the workflow aligns significantly with data governance.
    Top Answer:The focus for future improvements lies in strengthening the handling of unstructured data. This entails adapting to new environments, extracting data from platforms such as Slack or Teams, and… more »
    Top Answer:The process of categorizing data, creating glossaries, and generating metadata is streamlined and less time-consuming.
    Top Answer:The pricing is moderate, falling in the middle range—not excessively low nor overly expensive. I would rate it five out of ten. It is reasonably priced for medium-sized optimization needs and is… more »
    Top Answer:There are three components: Data Fabric, Data Hub, and Profisee. A more convenient approach would involve integrating all the pre-existing elements into Profisee itself.
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    232
    Comparisons
    167
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    535
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    2,002
    Comparisons
    1,129
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    936
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Ataccama ONE Platform is a comprehensive data management and governance solution designed to address the challenges faced by organizations in managing and leveraging their data assets. Its primary use case is to enable organizations to gain control over their data, improve data quality, and ensure compliance with data regulations.

    The most valuable functionality of Ataccama ONE includes data profiling, data quality management, data integration, master data management, and metadata management. These features allow organizations to understand the quality and structure of their data, integrate data from various sources, create a single view of their master data, and manage metadata to ensure data lineage and governance.

    By leveraging Ataccama ONE, organizations can achieve several benefits. Firstly, it helps in improving data quality by identifying and resolving data issues, ensuring accurate and reliable data for decision-making. Secondly, it enables organizations to streamline data integration processes, reducing the time and effort required for data integration projects. Thirdly, it facilitates effective master data management, enabling organizations to have a consistent and accurate view of their critical data entities. Lastly, it helps organizations in complying with data regulations by providing data lineage, data privacy, and data governance capabilities.

    The Profisee Platform is a full featured enterprise master data management solution designed to provide the lowest total cost of ownership of any competitive solution, without sacrificing on functionality across all major components of an MDM platform. The Profisee Platform was designed from the ground up as a multi-domain platform, to model and manage virtually any master data domain or reference data set. With a focus on the business, Profisee provides the first MDM solution that is truly approachable and affordable for business data stewards.

    Sample Customers
    Société Générale, First Data, Raiffeisenbank International, T-Mobile, Avast, RSA, Toronto Public Library
    NASDAQ, Rockwell Automation, ITT Industries, EY (Ernst & Young), Domino's, L3 Communications, Anheuser Busch, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Ameriprise Financial, GSO Capital Partners
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Quality
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ataccama ONE Platform is ranked 8th in Data Quality with 5 reviews while Profisee is ranked 4th in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 3 reviews. Ataccama ONE Platform is rated 7.8, while Profisee is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ataccama ONE Platform writes "Robust data management and governance praised for its user-friendly interface and scalability, but potential drawbacks include the need for improvements in search functionality". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Profisee writes "A reliable choice for organizations seeking efficient master data management providing cost-effective pricing, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with Microsoft-based tools". Ataccama ONE Platform is most compared with Microsoft Purview, Collibra Governance, Informatica MDM, Alation Data Catalog and Informatica Data Quality, whereas Profisee is most compared with Informatica MDM, Microsoft MDS, Semarchy xDM, Reltio Cloud and SAP Master Data Governance.

    We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.