IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Aspen Technology PIMS vs Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
7th
Views
79
Comparisons
42
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
6th
Views
708
Comparisons
61
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
PIMS
Aries Petroleum Economic Software
Learn More
Halliburton
Video Not Available
Overview
Fully integrated, web-enabled patient information management solution with revenue management, referral tracking, and resource scheduling.
The ARIES Petroleum Economics and Reserves Software provides comprehensive enterprise wide property and data management, production and reserve forecasting (using decline curves or other methods), and proven economic evaluations for operations, engineering, and business teams.
Offer
Learn more about Aspen Technology PIMS
Learn more about Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software
Sample Customers
Westlake Chemical
StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company27%
Financial Services Firm13%
Computer Software Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise61%

Aspen Technology PIMS is ranked 7th in Production Planning while Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is ranked 6th in Production Planning. Aspen Technology PIMS is rated 0.0, while Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Aspen Technology PIMS is most compared with , whereas Halliburton Aries Petroleum Economic Software is most compared with .

See our list of best Production Planning vendors.

We monitor all Production Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.