![ASG Enterprise Data Intelligence vs. SAP Data Hub [EOL] report](https://www.peerspot.com/assets/media/images/icons/pdf-c33db68f.svg){kind=icon}
![SAP Data Hub [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_64/CEemb89qoUxSyMpYC6s7paQ5.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![SAP Data Hub [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/CEemb89qoUxSyMpYC6s7paQ5.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![SAP Data Hub [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_40/CEemb89qoUxSyMpYC6s7paQ5.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
We used to have multiple different kinds of databases, which internally, had different compliance levels. Retention management is very different now. If the policy is live and the claim has been completed, I couldn't archive the claim. I needed to keep a reference integrity of that claim and understand which policy paid out the claim. With this solution, the policy came in six months ago and qualified for archiving. The claim had been paid and in every environment, the claim had been closed, including the reporting system, the claims system, etc. With the payment set gateway, I can just go and archive. But, we had a hard time during this process. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
![Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs SAP Data Hub [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/GqfBeX9zWxZG3rC5hyrUo9Aq.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAP Data Hub [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/8g8t9pkm2lzijgdvjrnla0p56jcn.jpeg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![Palantir Foundry vs SAP Data Hub [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/EqHZMFUJofZHsjpoGLnY4nYV.png?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
