We performed a comparison between Asana and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."Stable Kanban style tool for collaboration and task management. It runs smoothly and has a straightforward setup."
"The most valuable feature of Asana is the ease of navigation."
"It has helped our departments maintain visibility."
"Asana is a very simple interface for project managers to figure out, providing all the functions they need."
"The ability to build subtasks and break things down off of our major tasks has been very valuable. It is very stable and extremely scalable. The initial setup is very simple."
"It is very good for managing the timeline. I'm a quality manager, and I have different testing projects running with different work breakdown structures. Asana makes it very easy to implement and monitor the plans. It is easy to move the tasks and complete them, break them down, and assign them to people."
"What I like most about Asana is its simplicity. For example: we're not the only ones using it, and we onboard our customers to it, and normally, they have no questions."
"What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility."
"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."
"The inbox feature can be a little overwhelming if you are working with Asana just from its project boards and only checking it periodically."
"In some instances, there were subtasks where more than one person needed to review it, but I could only assign it to one person. I would have to create a subtask under a subtask and then assign it to other people. This could be improved."
"I rate the support from Asana a four out of five."
"Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer."
"The solution can be difficult for new users to use because of the interface."
"We have not used Asana on our private server. We have been using the cloud solution. We need an on premise solution for government agencies."
"If you have been using a tool like Jira for many years, it make time some time to get used to the minimalist layout in Asana."
"A user should be able to identify an assignee for specific tasks or task types while applying the template, or at a minimum, allow for a default assignee. As it is, the template gets created with the just task dates driven by the project start and end dates inputted by the user. In my current situation, I'm assigning myself to many tasks, so I have to do that manually every time. Even if I eventually start adding other people to assign tasks, there won't be more than a handful to do. However, those few people will have multiple tasks. It would be nice to be able to select those individuals during the setup rather than having to do so manually once the project has been created."
"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Procore Project Management is ranked 24th in Project Management Software with 1 review. Asana is rated 8.4, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Project, Wrike, Microsoft Azure DevOps, monday.com and Jira, whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Planview PPM Pro, Meridian Proliance PPM and Planisware.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
