Asana vs Procore Project Management comparison

"What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility."

"The ability to share projects and tasks among team members appears to be the most valuable feature."

"I really enjoy the portfolios in Asana. One of the ways Asana stands out to me is with portfolios. You can have all your different projects, and you can have those assigned to different teams. If you want to customize a grouping of projects, you can use portfolios. For instance, one of the things that we do is we can assign a portfolio to a specific strategic objective we have, and we can put all those projects that are related to that strategic objective in that portfolio. We then know exactly what people are working on to help us achieve our goals. So, I really like portfolios."

"The most valuable feature of Asana is the ease of navigation."

"Stable Kanban style tool for collaboration and task management. It runs smoothly and has a straightforward setup."

"Asana has a wonderful user experience that is very easy to interact with and has tons of integrations with other products and tools."

"It is stable and easy to set up."

"Asana's most valuable aspect is its ability to consolidate all tasks and projects onto a single board, allowing for seamless navigation through timelines from start to finish. Additionally, it enables the inclusion of key stakeholders and provides a private communication channel for discreet discussions. The organizational component of Asana is particularly beneficial, including its coding features."

"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."

"The coordination between the field and the office without the need to print or physically transport drawings is very valuable."

"Other companies have been using it for years, and it is a very stable platform."

"In some instances, there were subtasks where more than one person needed to review it, but I could only assign it to one person. I would have to create a subtask under a subtask and then assign it to other people. This could be improved."

"In Asana, there's no way to add a custom date field."

"We don't get enough notifications."

"It's difficult to have short-term collaborations with external users because the operations team owns the final licenses, and I work for marketing."

"The product's page is not user-friendly."

"There just needs to be a bit more direction on how to use it at the outset."

"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."

"If you have been using a tool like Jira for many years, it make time some time to get used to the minimalist layout in Asana."

"It takes time to use it. It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."

"It is not entirely intuitive, so there are areas for improvement."

"I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products...In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost."

"Asana has two different types of structures: company vs workspace. Company is really best if all the users you plan to assign work to are all internal (have the same corporate domain in their user ID email address). Once one person signs up (even for a free account) with a corporate email address, Asana will automatically relate that person to that company, if it already exists. If you plan to use it for external collaboration as well as internal, then creating a workspace is a better approach."

"Price-wise, I think it's an affordable option for mid to large-sized companies."

"It has a free version."

"There is a free version of Asana, but we use the paid version to receive all the features we want. The overall price is reasonable."

"We're on the business tier, which is $25 a month if you're on an annual contract. It's $31 if you're on a month-to-month contract. In my experience, there are no hidden costs with Asana. I know Smartsheet has these add-ons that you can buy, which is an additional cost, but Asana doesn't have any add-ons that I know of. When you're trying to scale the product and want to add users, you have to do it in buckets of five. This is also something to consider."

"The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget."

"The solution's free version can be used for basic functions."

"The tool is cheap and I would rate it a ten out of ten."