We performed a comparison between ARIS Process Governance and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Ability to use all the features that your catalog has inside the modeling and export it to a BPM augmentation engine."
"Using this solution we can design our own processor governance, assign some specific technical services, and also run tests of the process to make sure it operates as we need it to."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"It's a bit annoying that you have to use two environments in the older version."
"There is a lot of complexity around licensing."
"The solution uses a coding language for process design that is specific only to this product. We would like to see this changed to something more universal."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
ARIS Process Governance is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 21st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. ARIS Process Governance is rated 8.0, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ARIS Process Governance writes "Very easy to use and great for modeling business processes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". ARIS Process Governance is most compared with , whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Camunda Platform, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
