ARIS BPA and KiSSFLOW compete in the business process management software category. ARIS BPA appears to have the upper hand for organizations requiring detailed analysis and comprehensive governance, whereas KiSSFLOW is superior for those prioritizing rapid deployment and automation.
Features: ARIS BPA provides advanced business process modeling capabilities with solutions for strategic analysis, end-to-end process integration, and options for flexible notation such as EPC and BPMN. It supports complex enterprise architecture modeling and process analysis with a robust database-driven approach. KiSSFLOW is user-friendly with strong API integrations for quick process creation and automation, supporting no-code capabilities and excelling in simplicity and ease of use.
Room for Improvement: ARIS BPA is viewed as complex and costly with a steep learning curve. It faces challenges with integration and lacks a native workflow engine, limiting real-time execution. KiSSFLOW needs more customization options for UI and process design. It has limited advanced integration features compared to top solutions and requires enhancements in input flexibility and live document synchronization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ARIS BPA offers various deployment options, such as on-premises and hybrid cloud, but has lengthy implementation times and mixed customer service reviews. KiSSFLOW provides easier deployments, mainly in cloud environments, with straightforward implementation, though support feedback is variable.
Pricing and ROI: ARIS BPA’s pricing is regarded as expensive but valuable if fully utilized, featuring a flexible licensing scheme. KiSSFLOW offers a simpler subscription model with affordable entry points. ROI for both depends on the usage scale, with ARIS requiring longer timeframes for returns compared to the faster ROI of KiSSFLOW for automation and process simplification.
The consultants are fine, however, reliance on single experts for modules can be risky.
For user scalability, it is a matter of licenses, while functional scalability is supported and easy to implement.
ARIS BPA has high scalability and wide scalability for any enterprise or organization.
The stability of ARIS BPM is quite strong, rated eight out of ten.
Software AG should focus on developing AI models for ARIS BPA on-premises, particularly in user interfaces, as well as creating predefined business processes for common areas such as HR and finance.
Software AG could improve this by making the database more open.
ARIS BPA needs to be more accurate when generating documents.
ARIS BPA is a tool to build models and frameworks for organizations or reengineer business processes from both functional and business perspectives.
The maintenance capabilities of ARIS BPM and the strong underlying database are particularly valuable.
The solution is very stable with no stability issues.
ARIS is the market-leading solution for professional business process management and modeling. Whether you want to document the "as-is" state of your operations for quality or certification reasons or design the "to-be" in terms of continuous improvement in your transformation program, ARIS is the best choice for establishing a single source of truth regarding all process excellence topics in your organization. It is for any organization looking to digitally transform their business, increase operational excellence and customer experience and ensure compliance in execution. ARIS helps you to make the most out of your processes with Process Mining, Risk & Compliance Management, RPA and much more.
What makes the difference?
ARIS is the market-leading solution for any organization and ideally suited to digitally transform the organization, increase operational excellence and customer experience and ensure compliance in execution.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.