Stonebranch and AppWorx Workload Automation are solutions in the workload automation category. Stonebranch seems to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and platform support, while AppWorx is favored for its simplicity and reliability despite cost concerns.
Features: Stonebranch excels in integration capabilities, offering robust support for UNIX tasks across environments, universal templates, and stable agent performance. It supports a wide array of platforms and provides a comprehensive task management system. AppWorx is praised for its simple workload management and simultaneous application handling, utilizing AI for automation; however, it lacks support for mainframe environments.
Room for Improvement: Stonebranch users seek improved graphical workflow overviews and easier integration for dependencies, along with enhanced flexibility for certain tasks and API improvements. AppWorx needs a modernized UI, better internal security configurations, and improved analytics along with support materials. Users also desire mainframe support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Stonebranch supports on-premises and cloud deployment, with excellent customer support praised for quick resolutions and a knowledgeable team. AppWorx offers hybrid cloud capabilities and generally positive feedback on customer service, though response times and detailed support have been critiqued.
Pricing and ROI: Stonebranch offers cost-effective, flexible licensing appealing to various business sizes and is generally cheaper than competitors, providing good value. AppWorx's pricing model based on execution counts is seen as expensive, prompting businesses to explore alternatives due to its evolving cost structure.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
The product manages workloads efficiently, allowing our operators to learn and operate it quickly, which underscores its value to our business.
It has significantly reduced the time required for tasks that were previously manual, such as running batch and online jobs and report submissions.
We plan to migrate all the different work scheduling tools to Stonebranch, so I think we will have a single centralized license that will save a lot of cost to the company.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
Their current support level is really good.
Technical support is managed by third parties now, which complicates direct customer assistance from Broadcom.
The service executive was very prompt in providing a solution.
We received very good training given by Stonebranch staff, including operator training and administration training.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
Stonebranch is a very scalable application, and we can use it on various integrations and applications.
Stonebranch's scalability is very good.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
We have not faced any real issues, and it’s the main reason why we haven't enabled a lot of the redundancy features.
Stonebranch is very stable, and there are no bugs or glitches.
We have a huge workload across multiple regions and we are running on the same UAC.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
AppWorx Workload Automation does not support mainframe environments.
Licensing fees have increased as they charge based on executions rather than user agents, causing higher costs.
We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things.
Creating a task or job and then creating a schedule with time triggers and other triggers in different objects feels a bit complicated compared to other tools in the market where everything is laid out in a single pane and scheduling is easy.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
Licensing now depends on execution counts as opposed to agent counts, leading to increased costs.
The licensing is fair and reasonable for what the product offers.
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Stonebranch has been that it is a very affordable tool.
From an organizational cost perspective with Stonebranch, it is a bit cheaper than other tools available in the market.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
AppWorx Workload Automation's simplicity and powerful functionality are its most valuable features for us.
Atomic Applications Manager is user-friendly and accommodates around 100 users who can monitor and run their jobs effectively.
Stonebranch helps in reducing the times and the errors, and as a team, we can coordinate very smoothly with each other because the runtime is very fast, ensuring that each and every member is having similar experiences without any bugs.
Reporting helps us observe the trend of how much the script has executed in the past and what sort of load is expected in the future based on that analysis.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| JAMS | 2.6% |
| Stonebranch | 4.4% |
| AppWorx Workload Automation | 1.8% |
| Other | 91.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
AppWorx Workload Automation automates your Ellucian’s Banner or Fiserv DNA processing. This innovative, best-in-class task scheduling solution accelerates your processing, provides visibility and control over business processes, and mitigates risk in both environments.
AppWorx Workload Automation Can:
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Ellucian’s Banner
Benefits of AppWorx Workload Automation For Your Fiserv DNA Processing
Reviews from Real Users
“The most valuable feature for me is the scheduling,” says an enterprise application architect at a retailer who has been using the solution for close to 10 years.
A manager at a tech services company adds that “The interface is good. The compliance-related features are very good.”
Stonebranch specializes in enterprise automation, excelling in workload scheduling and batch processing across platforms like Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries. This platform offers robust automation, enhancing operational efficiency and supporting digital transformation.
Stonebranch's platform-agnostic capabilities allow organizations to manage and integrate workloads seamlessly. Its Universal Controller is central to task management, offering a web-based interface for flexibility. Users appreciate its stability, with reliable agents facilitating workflow creation without specialized skills. Efficient file transfers and scheduling tools minimize maintenance, supporting diverse tech environments. Though Stonebranch is beneficial, users look for improvements in graphical workflow visibility, finalized API functionalities, and enhanced connectivity with tools like Microsoft SRS. Enhancements in training materials and cloud availability are also desired.
What are the key features of Stonebranch?Stonebranch finds applications in sectors requiring enterprise automation. Organizations leveraging Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries utilize it for workflow automation, file management, and integrating distributed workloads. It supports tasks like data extraction and analytics, managing thousands of daily operations to enhance visibility and minimize manual interventions.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.